Bojan11
Full Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Messages
- 33,202
He is so ineffective as part of a front 3, play him in midfield ffs.
Why? He can’t pass so what’s the point of that? His range of passing is only passing where the ball came from.
He is so ineffective as part of a front 3, play him in midfield ffs.
He is so ineffective as part of a front 3, play him in midfield ffs.
He is so ineffective as part of a front 3, play him in midfield ffs.
Someone said it on reddit that if he wasn't English and homegrown he'd be considered a bigger flop than Sanchez. Though I disagree with that OTT view, he really is a player that should be battling for his place on the bench and not starting. Other than his mindless running he contributes to absolutely nothing else.
Lingard all time PL record for MUFC
Matches - 109
Goals - 17
Assist - 10
Sterling this season for city
Matches - 27
Goals - 17
Assist- 9
Fraser this season
Matches - 33
Goals- 7
Assists- 11
Lingard all time PL record for MUFC
Matches - 109
Goals - 17
Assist - 10
Sterling this season for city
Matches - 27
Goals - 17
Assist- 9
Fraser this season
Matches - 33
Goals- 7
Assists- 11
He opens space for others to score and assist. Can Sterling do that?Lingard all time PL record for MUFC
Matches - 109
Goals - 17
Assist - 10
Sterling this season for city
Matches - 27
Goals - 17
Assist- 9
Fraser this season
Matches - 33
Goals- 7
Assists- 11
He's a good finisher, should sign for a team like Burnley or Brighton who could use a mobile #10 on the counter.
He's the Purple Patch Kid. One great month every year then goes into hibernation for the rest of the season.2 goals and 1 assist came against Cardiff.
2 goals in 2 games against Arsenal.
1 goal in a loss against Liverpool.
1 assist against Huddersfield.
1 assist against Derby.
.
He's the Purple Patch Kid. One great month every year then goes into hibernation for the rest of the season.
Sounds like he's talking about Gomes.Will be playing next year. Ole seems to have made friends with him.
But, let's hear what the experts have to say...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/talksp...compared-barcelona-legend-andres-iniesta/amp/
I'm starting to see why things started going down hill in 2009...
One of the few players who enhanced his reputation under Mou. He's always been a squad player at best but seems to have gone off a cliff recently.I think last season is as good as it gets for Lingard.
The one in kindergarten?Dreadful since the injury. Needs to pick it up, surely he knows we'll be signing another winger this summer so he needs to impress.
Why has he suddenly turned into a Championship player? Bizarre
Why has he suddenly turned into a Championship player? Bizarre
He's a good squad player and a good guy to have around the group but he's not playing well at the moment.
The club's biggest issue is that they have nobody to replace him with who can play the same style.
Terrible really.
Is this good enough to be a first choice forward?
And folks around here defend him because he has 'movement'. What concrete proof is there that such movement actually pushes the team forward? Afterall,all players in a team have 'movement' one way or another.Lingard all time PL record for MUFC
Matches - 109
Goals - 17
Assist - 10
Sterling this season for city
Matches - 27
Goals - 17
Assist- 9
Fraser this season
Matches - 33
Goals- 7
Assists- 11
1. No he isn’t, he’s barely championship level squad player.
2. He’s a knob, riding his purple patche and social media status to make sure he stays relevant.
3. No, he’s playing at his level. Which is dog shit.
4. We have a couple of shit worthless cnuts that won’t put in a shift and are happy to take the money and fame. So his “style” is very easy to replace.
His role in the squad should be similar to Park. High octane, high energy game linking play and being able to play specific roles in big games.
No, no, no.
This mentality is all wrong. And it started under SAF. We are Man Utd, not Stoke.
Barcelona don't think, it's a big game, we must drop an attacking player for a destroyer/stamina machine like a Park/Lingard.
Neither do Madrid or City.
I would give him one more chance, on the right of our midfield in the 4-3-3. If he fails there, then sell.
Terrible really.
But you don't really need stats to see how pointless of a forward player he is.
Wow!
He's a regular England international. He's not a superstar but he's a very good squad player who came through the academy.
His role in the squad should be similar to Park. High octane, high energy game linking play and being able to play specific roles in big games. But he certainly shouldn't be a guaranteed starter and you need to surround him with more quality.
He should definitely not be in the team at the moment. His performances have been dire but criticising his effort is harsh. He's just in poor form and being outclassed by better players.
If players like Lingard frustrate you, I don't think the Ole era is for you. There is a very clear lean towards building the squad around players who came through the academy. Ole values their mentality and they will be front and centre in the squad while he is in charge.
Maybe City should have started Fernandinho vs Spurs and they'd still be in the Champions League.
Barca played Semedo at OT for defensive stability rather than Sergi Roberto. Different players have different strengths and some will suit a specific game plan or style of play more than others.
If the last few months under Ole have shown anything, it's that you need depth in the squad. United were playing well with the same front 6 at the start of Ole's reign. A couple of injuries and the style has to change as you can't play high tempo football with Mata, Sanchez and Lukaku in attack.
At worst, Lingard is a really good squad option.
The problem with the United attack is the experienced big money signings, not the young/academy players. Mata, Lukaku and Sanchez aren't at the level their status in the squad/salary demands.