Carl
has permanently erect nipples
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 45,757
Shit today. Not bothered. One of only about 4 players I'd be arsed about keeping at the club.
Indeed. But some people will still argue that he's good enough for United. They must be on fecking drugsSo it's one goal and no assists since Boxing Day?
For an attacking first team regular for Man Utd?
Indeed. But some people will still argue that he's good enough for United. They must be on fecking drugs
So what is he ? A 10, an attacking mid? A striker?
He can't even pass the ball right
Two things that have have absolutely nothing to do with each other .
We should never have sold Zaha true but Lingard had absolutely nothing to do with that decision
With acres of space too, that's everything that's wrong with his football. "Hit and hope" in a nutshellThe one where he just kept his head down and scuffed a shin height ball straight to the first West Ham defender?
Yeah I'd like to see that too.
Also a gif of his unusual "clearance" after they hit the bar.
That's actually a good point. There isn't an area of play where he's clearly improvedOne of those players that just strikes me as just happy to be called a Manchester United player.
No conviction in anything, no pride. It's all fun and games. Dislike him and the rest of the team so much.
I personally predicted around 5 years ago that he'd make a decent player in the Championship. But here we're with Lingard starting in games for us, and we're surprised with all the money spent, we still can't quite cement a UCL spot. Lingard isn't alone either in the mediocrity we've piled up at the club.
He's not a local lad either, coming from Warrington. He's as local to Manchester as he's to Liverpool. I seriously hope Ole does show a ruthlessness in the summer as reported in the tabloids, and sends Lingard to a club that befits his ability.
Can't remember his last decent game, and I say that as one of his most ardent supporters.
Yeah this is the issue, even if the club want him gone (doubtful). If he leaves, I imagine it'll be on a free.Nobody is going to be stupid enough to pay him over 100k a week like we are.
He shouldn't be a starter. At truly top clubs Lingard is like Sergi roberto and the likes. An academy product that comes in when you need to rest your top players and he happily does that for his career. Ideally he'd be coming into a team where he was surrounded by players that carry the team and he's just there to fill a role. Its really on us and how far we have fallen that we are relying on a player like Lingard as a first team player
At truly top class teams they have squad players that are actually good footballers. To use your example Sergi Roberto would walk into our first team. Lingard wouldn't get near Barcelona's bench. If we ever want to get near that level again we need to get real about the standard of player that is good enough to wear a united shirt. And it sure as shit isn't Lingard.He shouldn't be a starter. At truly top clubs Lingard is like Sergi roberto and the likes. An academy product that comes in when you need to rest your top players and he happily does that for his career. Ideally he'd be coming into a team where he was surrounded by players that carry the team and he's just there to fill a role. Its really on us and how far we have fallen that we are relying on a player like Lingard as a first team player
That (non-existent) movement and workrate though.Indeed. But some people will still argue that he's good enough for United. They must be on fecking drugs
Don't forget he's on England NT also. That's like the gold standard for some to rate players.But LVG, Jose and now Ole rate him and they must know better because they see him in training