Jesse Lingard image 14

Jesse Lingard England flag

2018-19 Performances

View full 2018-19 profile

4.8 Season Average Rating
Appearances
36
Goals
5
Assists
6
Yellow cards
6
Status
Not open for further replies.
Kostov said:
Is that something you discovered just now? I bet you checked every post of mine in this thread. :lol:

I'm not gonna get a "top red" medal now am I?

Then why are you arguing about something you have no idea how it works?
Click to expand...
Sarcasm isn't your strong point, is it? We are on to "top red" already? Wow.

Is the FIFA rating system a secret now? I'm not sure you do actually, you disagreed with your own opinion :lol:
 
ivaldo said:
Sarcasm isn't your strong point, is it? We are on to "top red" already? Wow.

Is the FIFA rating system a secret now? I'm not sure you do actually, you disagreed with your own opinion :lol:
Click to expand...
:lol:

Yeah I disagreed with my own opinion of him being a 75-82 level player and saying 82 is being generous for his actual quality. Go and get a lay down now, you've defended Lingard like a proper red knight.
 
Kostov said:
:lol:

Yeah I disagreed with my own opinion of him being a 75-82 level player and saying 82 is being generous for his actual quality. Go and get a lay down now, you've defended Lingard like a proper red knight.
Click to expand...
How are you still defending it? :lol:

He is rated within the parameters you've said you think he is, and when that was revealed to you, it's "generous." Though why am I supposed logic has escaped you?

Red knight? Top Red? :lol: I only need "sympathizer" and "fanboi" and I've got Bingo!
 
ivaldo said:
How are you still defending it? :lol:

He is rated within the parameters you've said you think he is, and when that was revealed to you, it's "generous." Though why am I supposed logic has escaped you?

Red knight? Top Red? :lol: I only need "sympathizer" and "fanboi" and I've got Bingo!
Click to expand...
It's not about how much is he rated. I knew his rating. I don't want to break it to you, but EA and KONAMI also, very often make proper ass of their ratings. In that same squad our best CB is rated as 81 while Bailly is at 82, Jones at 80. That's just a small example, and if you want it put at this way, Smalling is a much better CB than Lingard is a CAM ( or whatever his last positions is).

Getting 82 from EA, was generous for a player like Lingard, Rashford is at 81 for example.
 
Kostov said:
It's not about how much is he rated. I knew his rating. I don't want to break it to you, but EA and KONAMI also, very often make proper ass of their ratings. In that same squad our best CB is rated as 81 while Bailly is at 82, Jones at 80. That's just a small example, and if you want it put at this way, Smalling is a much better CB than Lingard is a CAM ( or whatever his last positions is).

Getting 82 from EA, was generous for a player lik Lingard, Rashford is at 81 for example.
Click to expand...
And Xhaka was 82, as was bleedin' Corluka. You've made an issue out of a light hearted rating. Pretty sad when you're that desperate to criticize one of our players. I won't reply again but knock yourself out with the last word.
 
Perrera, Lingard and Rashford are Pogba's main allies(Acadamy friendship) so Jose is proving a point what happens if they are on a side against him

We don't have too many options in striking department hence Radhford is on bench otherwise he wouldnt have made it to bench either
 
ivaldo said:
And Xhaka was 82, as was bleedin' Corluka. You've made an issue out of a light hearted rating. Pretty sad when you're that desperate to criticize one of our players. I won't reply again but knock yourself out with the last word.
Click to expand...
Nah, keep it to yourself. You just had an urge to defend something even though there was no need, while embarrassing yourself on the way.
 
Isn't it obvious?

Lingard booked the whole weekend off to play FIFA 19. Silly little boy.
 
So is he (was he) injured? I think I missed the news.
 
Howson was really weird when asked what was wrong with Lingard on his channel today, I know he isn't a fountain of knowledge as such but he does seem to know a bit about the players that come from the Academy and even knows some of them, and he dodged the question completely.
 
Oh dear, 'JLingz' is now an actual brand with clothing and accessories. ffs.
 
Scored some screamers but misses sitters when he does get the chance. His best position is CAM and he doesnt have the forward passing ability or consistent final pass to play there for United. Decent squad player.
 
I’d try him centrally as a false 9. He has excellent movement, and our whole attack would be more dynamic.

Last year away to Everton, we basically played Martial left, Jessi middle and Mata right, and it’s the best I’ve seen us play for a long time. There was such fluidity in our play, and so long as Lukaku isn’t on the pitch I’d be happy.
 
Rozay said:
I’d try him centrally as a false 9. He has excellent movement, and our whole attack would be more dynamic.

Last year away to Everton, we basically played Martial left, Jessi middle and Mata right, and it’s the best I’ve seen us play for a long time. There was such fluidity in our play, and so long as Lukaku isn’t on the pitch I’d be happy.
Click to expand...
Jesus, is movement the only and most important attribute our new attacker should posses? Because apart from that, Lingard is a worse footballer than Lukaku, and certainly a worse attacker. I mean what's the point, Lingard isn't good enough to start anywhere for Manchester United, never mind striker.
 
Kostov said:
Jesus, is movement the only and most important attribute our new attacker should posses? Because apart from that, Lingard is a worse footballer than Lukaku, and certainly a worse attacker. I mean what's the point, Lingard isn't good enough to start anywhere for Manchester United, never mind striker.
Click to expand...

But we don’t have Harry Kane do we? I’m looking at options within what we have.

And Lingard has movement and can run with the ball. As a result, he stretches the play and provides a different type of threat.
 
Rozay said:
But we don’t have Harry Kane do we? I’m looking at options within what we have.

And Lingard has movement and can run with the ball. As a result, he stretches the play and provides a different type of threat.
Click to expand...

Mata's performance at the weekend showed why Lingard should not be playing ahead of him at all. Be it at #10 or out wide.
 
Rozay said:
But we don’t have Harry Kane do we? I’m looking at options within what we have.

And Lingard has movement and can run with the ball. As a result, he stretches the play and provides a different type of threat.
Click to expand...
No we don’t, but why would someone think Lingard is a better option than Lukaku?

Yeah his best attribute is movement and running. He is also bang average on the ball and weak when on it. Slower and inconsistent as feck. In all honesty if we had to look at options, I’d rather we give a chance to someone like Greenwood, rather than try a bang average player, who’s not even good enough in his primary position.
 
Mcking said:
Lingard have played how many games? He's not been worse than Sanchez.
Click to expand...

He has. At least Sanchez has contributed in ways of the winner against Newcastle and assists leading to goals. And I say this as someone who is very disappointed with Sanchez.
 
JoaquinJoaquin said:
He has. At least Sanchez has contributed in ways of the winner against Newcastle and assists leading to goals. And I say this as someone who is very disappointed with Sanchez.
Click to expand...
Sanchez has a goal and an assist in 437 minutes. Lingard, an assist in 420. The stats are no reason why Sanchez should be playing ahead of Lingard. The performances, neither.
 
He had a fun purple patch last season that we enjoyed but he's back to what he was always was, a pointless attacking player that moves a lot.
 
Mcking said:
Sanchez has a goal and an assist in 437 minutes. Lingard, an assist in 420. The stats are no reason why Sanchez should be playing ahead of Lingard. The performances, neither.
Click to expand...

Except one has been world class for years and the other never will never be. I'd rather take my chances on Sánchez potentially getting back to form than persevering with bang average Lingard. There is a reason we haven't missed Lingard at all while he has been injured, and the reason for that is because he actually isn't very good.
 
Never thought I would say this and it pretty much shows how desperate we are but i cant wait for him to come back,simply because he adds pace and well needed urgency to our attacks.
I would play like this.
----------------Sanchez---------------
Martial-----Lingard----Rashford
 
Status
Not open for further replies.