K2K
Full Member
Squad player at best.
He will have his moments throughout the season but shouldn't be starting many.
He will have his moments throughout the season but shouldn't be starting many.
No one expected that. He didn't play a single minute during their pre-season and was never going to start the game.
He's our Oscar.
Midtable player but Mourinho keep playing him over "De Bruyne" because of his "hardworking" attitude.
Mou expected Real to play Ronaldo. You don't put Martial to double mark the best player in the world. The Frenchman has yet to comprehend the concept of backtracking.
I see Lingard in the same way as I see Fellaini. They are a consequence of a squad which has serious deficiences. Hopefully we will outgrow them both next season.
And even if he had played, he would have been on the other side of the pitch!No one expected that. He didn't play a single minute during their pre-season and was never going to start the game.
You have to wonder if he'll start on Sunday. I think we'll see Martial instead.
How did he play last night? I was working so couldn't catch the game. Although I heard he wasn't great?
We thought that so many times but he always comes back. As someone said earlier, he's a survivor. He'll start and be invisible in plenty of games this season, too.I honestly think Lingard would of started, but now surely his days as a starter are finished. If José starts him Sunday he is on a crusade to finish out of the Top 4 again.
Fear.Why is it that managers don't see the defensive upside of starting someone more threatening? By starting Martial Carvajal would surely be less interested in going forward and leaving space behind. Lingard just invites pressure because no one has to worry about him.
As I've said numerous times he shouldn't get off lightly because of his squad player status, because he's more than that and has never shown any consistensy to warrant his place.
The guy is so far off in quality as a starter it's farcical. He's shown no improvement since he broke through. His best performances are always in preseason when teams aren't bothered to match his intensity.
Doesn't matter. Oscar's playing fecking chinese league now when the other guy(De Bruyne) is a real gemOscar was a much better player than Jesse in fairness.
Why is it that managers don't see the defensive upside of starting someone more threatening? By starting Martial Carvajal would surely be less interested in going forward and leaving space behind. Lingard just invites pressure because no one has to worry about him.
As I've said numerous times he shouldn't get off lightly because of his squad player status, because he's more than that and has never shown any consistensy to warrant his place.
The guy is so far off in quality as a starter it's farcical. He's shown no improvement since he broke through. His best performances are always in preseason when teams aren't bothered to match his intensity.
Yeah, I'm even struggling to see this fabled good movement. He was absolutely invisible last night; you'd expect someone with such great movement to get on the ball in dangerous positions every once in a while but no, nothing like that.How is he a professional footballer?
I'm struggling to work out what he excels in, i was told by a friend that he has good movement but is that sufficient, i would say even at champioship level club he would be found out?
Yeah, I'm even struggling to see this fabled good movement. He was absolutely invisible last night; you'd expect someone with such great movement to get on the ball in dangerous positions every once in a while but no, nothing like that.
I think his movement is over-emphasised and overrated in absence of any obvious outstanding quality of his. He can take a nice shot every once in a while, runs around a lot... and that's about it.
Yeah, I'm even struggling to see this fabled good movement. He was absolutely invisible last night; you'd expect someone with such great movement to get on the ball in dangerous positions every once in a while but no, nothing like that.
I think his movement is over-emphasised and overrated in absence of any obvious outstanding quality of his. He can take a nice shot every once in a while, runs around a lot... and that's about it.
Nah, I think that's rubbish. He is just limited, he doesn't have the talent. There's nothing to indicate he's not willing to work hard but he just lacks the natural ability.The likes of Lingard/Fellaini/Young really do highlight the gulf in quality between us and the top teams.
With Lingard especially, he seems to offer no attacking movement or goal threat. He is mid to bottom premier league standard and is extremely fortunate to be around our 1st team. He has got lucky in recent seasons due to us having literally no other options.
His dancing around in the changing room with his pal pogba appears to be more important to him than his football on the pitch, as he puts little effort into improving his gameplay based on the last 2 seasons. A Man utd calibre player should offer so much more, him and Pogba really grate on me thinking they are world beaters when in football terms they are miles off
Last nights game, albeit a "friendly" of sorts should act as a wake up call to so many of our players. A change in mentality and attitude is needed badly.
If we want to challenge for the premier league title, Lingard needs to play as little as possible, with Martial and Rashford playing much more. Lingard should be nowhere near out x11.
To highlight how poor Lingard is, if you could imagine he was available for transfer, would any top teams in this country or others want him? I would suspect clubs like West Ham, Swansea etc would be his level. Possibly he'd get a club a bit higher, like Everton, Spurs, but he would be a rotation option there. That in itself tells you everything there is to know about Lingard.
Shame Bale isn't open to the move, we need him
We thought that so many times but he always comes back. As someone said earlier, he's a survivor. He'll start and be invisible in plenty of games this season, too.
He's a 'good squad player' in a very limited sense. He should be played in dead rubber games, ie.: if we're already through to the next round in the CL or we're 5-0 up after the first leg of a League Cup semi-final. He can play against lower league teams in the domestic cups. He could be brought on when we're either winning or losing comfortably to prevent injuries to better players.Yeah .. This seems kind of true. When he plays, he is quite average apart from a few moments. But when he is dropped, the starting 11 also don't play that well and this leads to the misconceived notion that introducing Lingard might change things.
Think he should not be made to start games. Should be brought on as a sub if at all.
The likes of Lingard/Fellaini/Young really do highlight the gulf in quality between us and the top teams.
With Lingard especially, he seems to offer no attacking movement or goal threat. He is mid to bottom premier league standard and is extremely fortunate to be around our 1st team. He has got lucky in recent seasons due to us having literally no other options.
His dancing around in the changing room with his pal pogba appears to be more important to him than his football on the pitch, as he puts little effort into improving his gameplay based on the last 2 seasons. A Man utd calibre player should offer so much more, him and Pogba really grate on me thinking they are world beaters when in football terms they are miles off
Last nights game, albeit a "friendly" of sorts should act as a wake up call to so many of our players. A change in mentality and attitude is needed badly.
If we want to challenge for the premier league title, Lingard needs to play as little as possible, with Martial and Rashford playing much more. Lingard should be nowhere near out x11.
To highlight how poor Lingard is, if you could imagine he was available for transfer, would any top teams in this country or others want him? I would suspect clubs like West Ham, Swansea etc would be his level. Possibly he'd get a club a bit higher, like Everton, Spurs, but he would be a rotation option there. That in itself tells you everything there is to know about Lingard.
Shame Bale isn't open to the move, we need him
Nah, I think that's rubbish. He is just limited, he doesn't have the talent. There's nothing to indicate he's not willing to work hard but he just lacks the natural ability.
He's a 'good squad player' in a very limited sense. He should be played in dead rubber games, ie.: if we're already through to the next round in the CL or we're 5-0 up after the first leg of a League Cup semi-final. He can play against lower league teams in the domestic cups. He could be brought on when we're either winning or losing comfortably to prevent injuries to better players.
But starting him against Real Madrid is insane.
its because his poor performance are more common and he brings nothing to the team that my dog couldn't doThis thread is classic, good performances and no posts, bad performance (vs best team in world) and several pages
He's still so young and has so much potential, but unfortunately for us he ages in dog years and will be 25 later this year.
He's still so young and has so much potential, but unfortunately for us he ages in dog years and will be 25 later this year.
The reason there's never any posts in here after a good performance, is because there never is a good performance.
Park Ji-Sung was a comfortably better player than Lingard. It's not even close tbh, Park was mentally on another level.
Just find it funny. Fellaini playing well so we all migrate to the lingard thread for a couple of weeks until fellaini has a poor performance and then he can be the reason we aren't doing well (instead of the truth, that mourinho isn't doing his job better)its because his poor performance are more common and he brings nothing to the team that my dog couldn't do