bosskeano
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2020
- Messages
- 5,509
if 35m is a bit put in by west ham, why can't Utd match that bid as fair market value??? i mean feck right off UEFA
Because it apparently got rejected?if 35m is a bit put in by west ham, why can't Utd match that bid as fair market value??? i mean feck right off UEFA
I mean technically we still can. Or even better sign him for less but the issue is we would have to drop out of Europa League. Those are the rules apparently.if 35m is a bit put in by west ham, why can't Utd match that bid as fair market value??? i mean feck right off UEFA
haha...no what i meant by that is the market was established as a bid another club was willing to make so it would be like Nice and Sir Jim were selling him at a reduced priceBecause it apparently got rejected?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
"...Pre-exisiting transfer agreements..." Does that mean if we had agreed a contract before the end of the season, he would have been allowed to move to us?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
No its to cover City signing Savio"...Pre-exisiting transfer agreements..." Does that mean if we had agreed a contract before the end of the season, he would have been allowed to move to us?
This is the exact same rule that Aston Villa FC & Vitória Sport Clube; Brighton & Royal Union Saint-Gilloise; and AC Milan & Toulouse FC were forced to sign up to 12 months ago. It is standard practice now.What a joke. They are making these rules up on the fly. There is simply no reason why Man United can't buy Todibo for example if we pay the same fee that is also agreed with let's say West Ham. So if Nice accept a fee from West Ham for 40m, and we agree the same, then what's the problem? It's still 40m regardless into Nice's accounts. They may want to claim the 40m into Nice's account is also 40m into INEOS's accounts and that can be used by Man United, but that's clearly not the case. A simple yearly audit of the accounts by UEFA can sort any discrepancy or suspicion.
It isn't, they "signed" Savio from Troyes, he was just on loan at Girona.No its to cover City signing Savio
The statement says directly or indirectlyIt isn't, they "signed" Savio from Troyes, he was just on loan at Girona.
I'd imagine indirectly in that sense would be they couldn't move them from Girona to Troyes then loan from Troyes to CityThe statement says directly or indirectly
Troyes are still under the City Football Group umbrella. It's definitely sketchy.It isn't, they "signed" Savio from Troyes, he was just on loan at Girona.
Wait, it stops us signing him before the 25/26 season as well?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Which is completely irrelevant for UEFA, because Troyes isn't competing in any of their tournaments.Troyes are still under the City Football Group umbrella. It's definitely sketchy.
The dates of that embargo would also rule out a transfer next season too, regardless of which European competition the clubs are in, so that doesn't seem to be the crucial factor after all, especially as UEFA have cleared the clubs to both play in the Europa League this season.Which is completely irrelevant for UEFA, because Troyes isn't competing in any of their tournaments.
Why would he want to do that though?Could United sign Todibo and register him for PL matches only this season?
It would basically be like the old transfer window would rule for UEFA matches before the domestic leagues instituted a closed summer window, like when United signed Silvestre in Sep 1999 but he couldn't feature in the CL until after the winter window. Obviously not the same reason but is the rule only against UEFA sactioned competitions?
Just asking the question and can think of a few reasons he'd take a move to United.Why would he want to do that though?
I wish we can loan Anthony to Nice. Players like Pellestri aren’t getting a chance cause of ETH. He prefers Anthony even though he hasn’t done shit.Seems like the best we can do right now with the multi club ownership with Nice in europe is sending players on loan there. Any young players we sign that arent ready for United yet and players like Pellistri who is still young but doesnt seem like he's going to get games
Sure, but not if it jeopardizes his career and gambling he can play in Europe with us is not exactly a wise career move.Just asking the question and can think of a few reasons he'd take a move to United.
How is it jeopardizing his career?Sure, but not if it jeopardizes his career and gambling he can play in Europe with us is not exactly a wise career move.
Troyes isn't going to play in a UEFA competition for many, many years. They only saved their Ligue 2 spot because a club above them went bankrupt.The dates of that embargo would also rule out a transfer next season too, regardless of which European competition the clubs are in, so that doesn't seem to be the crucial factor after all, especially as UEFA have cleared the clubs to both play in the Europa League this season.
This has the potential to head into Bosman territory I think.
No.Could United sign Todibo and register him for PL matches only this season?
It would basically be like the old transfer window would rule for UEFA matches before the domestic leagues instituted a closed summer window, like when United signed Silvestre in Sep 1999 but he couldn't feature in the CL until after the winter window. Obviously not the same reason but is the rule only against UEFA sactioned competitions?
Well why would we play someone week in week out in the league, only to take them out the side when we play in Europe. It's a daft move if can't play in Europe and I imagine he'd be advised the same.How is it jeopardizing his career?
He'd be getting paid massively, likely be a regular in the first team, get to play at a huge club, likely get more exposure for NT selection, so forth.
Against the rules?
Sigh. Anyhow, carry on.Well why would we play someone week in week out in the league, only to take them out the side when we play in Europe. It's a daft move if can't play in Europe and I imagine he'd be advised the same.
Is there any reason they can’t do this?Transfer Todibo to Lausanne and loan him to United.
If we were really keen on him, not being able to play him in Europe for a year would not be so horrible. We have other defenders to slot in there.Why would he want to do that though?
It's just a very United centric view and assuming he's happy to risk not playing European football for 2 years.Against the rules?
Sigh. Anyhow, carry on.
Agree 100% with this mate.I would rather just stay away from this. The less we have in common with City, the better.
It’s one target, move on and look elsewhere
If it goes to September 2025, I imagine that means it's 2 years of no European football. Maybe 1.5 if we can register him Jan and that's not including the risk they come down on us for trying to flout it.If we were really keen on him, not being able to play him in Europe for a year would not be so horrible. We have other defenders to slot in there.
I bet this would not be allowed either though. We simply would not be able to register him anywhere.