Jamie Carragher: Spits in the face of 14 year old girl | Suspended by Sky

How should Carragher be punished?

  • Forced to wear a United shirt with Neville on the back for MNF forever

    Votes: 360 46.0%
  • Go on Jeremy Kyle with the family

    Votes: 169 21.6%
  • Be made to walk alone through Liverpool

    Votes: 113 14.4%
  • Buy a my little pony for the girl

    Votes: 141 18.0%

  • Total voters
    783
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lot of whiter than white internet angels on here. I'm going to break rank and say I certainly would spit on someone. If they were wazzing on my puppy, making the wanker's sign over a relative's tombstone, the list goes on. Wouldn't think twice about expectorating all over them and with real malevolent force. Give Carra a break.
Really? My first reaction would be to swing at them, I'd have to make a conscious effort to even think about spitting at someone.
It just doesn't make sense to me.
 
A lot of bizarre downplaying of Carragher's act. If I was caught on camera spitting on a child, I would expect to be fired.

Carragher has taken on a role as someone in the public eye. He is watched by millions (including kids) every week. Whether he wants to be or not, he is a role model. I'm not sure rehiring him is a brilliant idea.
 
A lot of bizarre downplaying of Carragher's act. If I was caught on camera spitting on a child, I would expect to be fired.

Carragher has taken on a role as someone in the public eye. He is watched by millions (including kids) every week. Whether he wants to be or not, he is a role model. I'm not sure rehiring him is a brilliant idea.

It wasn't but then the bbc have questionable judgement perhaps
 
A lot of bizarre downplaying of Carragher's act. If I was caught on camera spitting on a child, I would expect to be fired.

Carragher has taken on a role as someone in the public eye. He is watched by millions (including kids) every week. Whether he wants to be or not, he is a role model. I'm not sure rehiring him is a brilliant idea.

I can kinda understand why he was rehired. He's a good pundit, with decent chemistry with Neville, and the reality is that most pundits are either bland or a bit stupid .. or both. I wouldn't have let him return, but a decent argument can be made that people deserve a second chance if they are apologetic enough (obviously within reason) and it seems he genuinely is sorry.

The argument that 'eh, spitting isn't that bad anyway, terrorism is worse' is terrible though, it's a really nasty thing to do and he admitted as much.
 
I can kinda understand why he was rehired. He's a good pundit, with decent chemistry with Neville, and the reality is that most pundits are either bland or a bit stupid .. or both. I wouldn't have let him return, but a decent argument can be made that people deserve a second chance if they are apologetic enough (obviously within reason) and it seems he genuinely is sorry.

The argument that 'eh, spitting isn't that bad anyway, terrorism is worse' is terrible though, it's a really nasty thing to do and he admitted as much.
Exactly. Bizarre mental gymnastics. As I said, I'm not sure he should have been rehired, which means I'm also not sure he shouldn't have been either. I'm divided on this issue. His conduct since the incident has helped his case. But not all of us would have gotten that second chance, and certainly no one should be downplaying the severity of his act.
It wasn't but then the bbc have questionable judgement perhaps
What wasn't? I don't understand your statement.
 
Nah, almost no one would.
This is bollocks. Regardless of our opinion of what he did, this is something that happened outside of work that he's not been convicted for. Just so happens he's in the public eye hence why people are saying he should be sacked.

Fact is, why would you sack someone for something that's not lead to a conviction?
 
This is bollocks. Regardless of our opinion of what he did, this is something that happened outside of work that he's not been convicted for. Just so happens he's in the public eye hence why people are saying he should be sacked.

Fact is, why would you sack someone for something that's not lead to a conviction?

If you worked in a job in which public perception was an important factor and a video emerged of you spitting at a teenage girl, you would be sacked in an instant. The only reason Carragher hasn't been is because he has a decent draw and is a good pundit. Your average guy would be considered disposable and not worth the trouble.
 
Bring him back ffs. One of very few decent pundits. Don't really care if he spat at someone. It's not the end of the world.
 
I truly believe he didn't want to spit on a 14 year old. Said his Sorry, got suspended and now back on . I think its fair . Truly foul to spit on someone but he was not aiming at that girl that much I do know .
 
Bring him back ffs. One of very few decent pundits. Don't really care if he spat at someone. It's not the end of the world.

He is one of a kind, an ex Pool player who isn't an absolute delusional numpty.

He was never getting sacked for this, he is too valuable to sky in being one of only two good pundits they have.

Personally i think the shame of having to live with what he done is punishment enough. He is going to get constant abuse off rival fans about it and he will know he can't do anything as a camera phone is never too far away.
 
If you worked in a job in which public perception was an important factor and a video emerged of you spitting at a teenage girl, you would be sacked in an instant. The only reason Carragher hasn't been is because he has a decent draw and is a good pundit. Your average guy would be considered disposable and not worth the trouble.
"Most people" don't have a job in which public perception is an important factor, so yes most people would get to keep their job. I'd even say most employers wouldn't even know that a regular employee did such a thing unless they stumble upon it on YouTube, but why would you upload it in the first place if the offender isn't publicly known?
 
Does it make it worse somehow? I can't see it.
I’d say so, at the very least it also shows recklessness on the road. Entering into an argument via the car windows and then directing a full mouthful of spit means he wasn’t paying much attention to the road. Granted there might have been no one around but it still makes it even worse for me in the same way the guy filming is being a proper arsehole for using his phone while driving.
 
I’d say so, at the very least it also shows recklessness on the road. Entering into an argument via the car windows and then directing a full mouthful of spit means he wasn’t paying much attention to the road. Granted there might have been no one around but it still makes it even worse for me in the same way the guy filming is being a proper arsehole for using his phone while driving.

I'm surprised the guy filming it got away with using his phone whilst driving to be honest.
 
It's all much of a nothing for me. We take ourselves so seriously.. One animal spat some fluid at another animal. My god. It's only life, who fecking cares.
 
Lets not spit hairs here, he’s guilty of having spat at someone, a child. This is one of the most reprehensible and disgusting things you can do to another person.

It’s not like he’s short of a quid or two, so doesn’t need the job and surely there’s a few decent ex pros out there with considered opinions that Sky could try out.

I can’t believe he’s going back on telly, we truly are living in a Trump age.

In the list of reprehensible and disgusting things you can do to another person...I would say spitting is quite low, underneath murder, rape, torture etc.

This incident is just a classic example of what society is like these days. Yes it was a stupid thing to do and pretty disgusting, but everyone has to make a point that they are outraged the most.
 
In the list of reprehensible and disgusting things you can do to another person...I would say spitting is quite low, underneath murder, rape, torture etc.

This incident is just a classic example of what society is like these days. Yes it was a stupid thing to do and pretty disgusting, but everyone has to make a point that they are outraged the most.

Well for me, murder, rape, torture etc would go into the unforgivable category. Not sure how people view the word “reprehensible” these days, but spitting is definitely in that category, that being it’s worthy of censure and condemnation.
 
He was goaded and responded like a dick, he's had sufficient punishment, the end.

Its not like he spat at some family selling cookies for cancer research is it? He spat at some douche bag family speeding down the motorway to blatantly abuse him. Fair fecks i say.
 
Still can't get my head around doing something that weird, goaded or not.
 
Well for me, murder, rape, torture etc would go into the unforgivable category. Not sure how people view the word “reprehensible” these days, but spitting is definitely in that category, that being it’s worthy of censure and condemnation.
When do you plan to forgive him then?
 
When do you plan to forgive him then?

Forgiveness? This isn’t about forgiveness. Due to him being a very public figure and a “role model” for youngsters, as well as being a grown man, presumably capable of making rational decisions, it’s about a message in general.
That message being that either society will tolerate people of notoriety and fame behaving as such and giving them a pass for their behaviour, or saying no, this won’t do and we’re not having it.

It’s surprising how many people appear willing to let Carragher spit on them and then forgive him...

Anyway, I’ve said my piece, you know where I stand and I don’t need to say anymore on it.:)
 
Forgiveness? This isn’t about forgiveness. Due to him being a very public figure and a “role model” for youngsters, as well as being a grown man, presumably capable of making rational decisions, it’s about a message in general.
That message being that either society will tolerate people of notoriety and fame behaving as such and giving them a pass for their behaviour, or saying no, this won’t do and we’re not having it.

It’s surprising how many people appear willing to let Carragher spit on them and then forgive him...

Anyway, I’ve said my piece, you know where I stand and I don’t need to say anymore on it.:)
Yeah, most on here think it's nothing much to get fussed about having someone spit in your ( or your child's ) face. disgusting little gobshite, in my opinion.
 
"Most people" don't have a job in which public perception is an important factor, so yes most people would get to keep their job. I'd even say most employers wouldn't even know that a regular employee did such a thing unless they stumble upon it on YouTube, but why would you upload it in the first place if the offender isn't publicly known?

Mate, there are a bunch of people who have lost their job or position while being unknown. Drunk uber doctor girl, X'd out girl who made out with a tree during Ultra Fest, there are countless examples of people who have lost their job due to social media and viral videos without the need to be a public figure.
 
Mate, there are a bunch of people who have lost their job or position while being unknown. Drunk uber doctor girl, X'd out girl who made out with a tree during Ultra Fest, there are countless examples of people who have lost their job due to social media and viral videos without the need to be a public figure.

Precisely. If you get caught on video doing something stupid which will make whoever you work for look bad, the likelihood is your employer will get rid of you to avoid the bad press. Carragher has stayed because he obviously has friends in the right places and is worth enough to them that usual rules don't apply. Can assure you that if any of us spat at a teenage girl in a car and a video of it went viral, we wouldn't get that kind of second chance.

Like others have said, it doesn't bother me too much because he's a genuinely decent pundit and seems apologetic, but let's not pretend what he did was normal or acceptable. He did something vile but has got a second chance, it's as simple as that.
 
Mate, there are a bunch of people who have lost their job or position while being unknown. Drunk uber doctor girl, X'd out girl who made out with a tree during Ultra Fest, there are countless examples of people who have lost their job due to social media and viral videos without the need to be a public figure.
The Hargreaves Landown broker who joked about running over cyclists and the PR woman who made that bad Aids joke about Africa.
 
Glad he's back. Made a bad mistake, apologised, was suspended and rightfully ridiculed and now it's time to move. Stop making it a thing.
 
The Hargreaves Landown broker who joked about running over cyclists and the PR woman who made that bad Aids joke about Africa.
The esteemed scientist who made a crack during a lecture in South Korea construed as sexist by the wanklords back here and was subsequently hauled through the feces is another. The comic shame of Carragher's stupidity was basically punishment enough.
 
This is bollocks. Regardless of our opinion of what he did, this is something that happened outside of work that he's not been convicted for. Just so happens he's in the public eye hence why people are saying he should be sacked.

Fact is, why would you sack someone for something that's not lead to a conviction?

It's called Image and Brand Reputation. Sometimes it doesn't make sense but companies will do whatever it takes to protect their brand. If they are presented with anything that is putting their brand name in a negative light they will distance themselves from it.

Happens all the time. There's loads of high profile examples. Some companies have the conviction to go with it. Others will bottle it. Gray and Keys were not so fortunate but then again misogyny cases are always that bit more emotive.
 


Can someone with better eyes than me confirm this is actually him? If so, its a bit risky getting involved in a spat when he's just got back from his suspension for the spit.
 
You’d expect someone in that position to ignore it and walk (or drive) on. Look at people like Katie Hopkins and Piers Morgan who get pure hate all day every day. Do they give one? Same for Jamie. He’s a retired footballer on the gravy train at SKY. Don’t know why he gives a shit what anyone has to say he should just ignore them and enjoy his life. Getting into spats with fans far too easily.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.