Kostov
Full Member
Same was said about Maguire. You are missing the point.I never understand Caf members worrying about other people's money!
Same was said about Maguire. You are missing the point.I never understand Caf members worrying about other people's money!
For sure but I'd stick a bid in. £30m.
Garner isn’t one of the best set piece takers on earth. He just isn’t. He’s decent but comparing the two is like an apple vs a jet engine.We don’t need ward prowse if garner is just as good at set pieces, waste of money in my opinion, also I heard city are after him so it’s a no brainer who he’d choose… although at city he’s more then likely going to be sitting on the bench.
But surely the Charlie Adam comparison makes more sense as a big premier league team actually took a gamble on him, unlike Juninho who stayed at Lyon throughout his prime…
Some English players can flop and some dont. Just because we flopped with Maguire and Wan Bissaka, doesn’t mean we should never buy one again. Maguire was sort of fine up until this season. Wan Bissaka was never good enough.
If it fits the system and manager, bingo. JWP is exactly what we would need on all levels. Very good allrounder with excellent crossing, freekicks and corners. He wont win us single handedly the league title, but as one of a couple midfield signings, perfect.
These types have a place in every squad, as football is a team game. I feel he could flourish here.
I know he is not that exciting for most, expensive English midfielder, not flamboyant and fancy, boring even. But i think we need to go back to basics and have a fundament for our squad, with some 'honest' quality players, that improve our weaknesses. You also have to add your attacking match winners and excellent technical players, but one doesn't exclude the other, as we have 11 players on the pitch.
Baring in mind garner is just 21 and ward prowse is 27…For that fee I would be delighted with his signing.
Garner isn’t one of the best set piece takers on earth. He just isn’t. He’s decent but comparing the two is like an apple vs a jet engine.
Juninho won seven Ligue Un’s in an absolutely dominant side (giving us a great many very tough games in the Champions League during that spell) and was run by Aulas who was notoriously difficult to negotiate with. Juninho was absolutely top drawer and a proven winner.
Even beyond the ludicrous Adam vs Juninho comparison, even Ward-Prowse vs Adam doesn’t hold any water. Adam spent one year in a side that was relegated, vs Ward-Prowse who’s been a good premier league player for a decade.
Agreed, we need the stability of consistent hard workers in the team at this stage. He's a decent player is JWP and he's proven what he'll bring to a team.
People are so obsessed at only signing players that might one day be world class but that's been a disaster for us. Do people never learn.
It'll take a few less glamorous signings for us to build the stability in the squad so that new signings raise our level rather than get dragged down by poor structure.
Baring in mind garner is just 21 and ward prowse is 27…
I agree with what your saying… I don’t think we should be spending 75 mil though on a player we don’t need when there’s a possibility that we have a similar type of player in our team already. I’m saying 75 mil because that’s what I’ve been seeing the quoted price is at. City are also interested so if it’s a choice then he’ll clearly choose them anyway.But you said if he’s just as good. He isn’t. There’s about a 0.01% chance of him going on to be.
This isn’t an anti-Garner point, it’s a fact. Ward-Prowse is up there with Beckham and Juninho Pernambucano. For what it’s worth I’ve liked what I’ve seen of Garner and definitely think there’s a role for him (although another year at Forest playing week in week our in the premier league may be a smarter move for him).
Not to mention his very average defensive stats (in Hassenhuttl’s mental pressing side too where you’d expect pressures and interceptions to be higher) and his very poor dribbling and progression stats on the ball. Saw someone say he’s better than Hargreaves ever was. Wild.Guys advocating for this...78% pass completion.
Would not even come close to cutting it here. Imagine having Bruno and him giving it away at that rate. That's not viable. Maybe he could tidy it up and play less risky for us but why gamble on it, buy a top passer to start with.
Some English players can flop and some dont. Just because we flopped with Maguire and Wan Bissaka, doesn’t mean we should never buy one again. Maguire was sort of fine up until this season. Wan Bissaka was never good enough.
If it fits the system and manager, bingo. JWP is exactly what we would need on all levels. Very good allrounder with excellent crossing, freekicks and corners. He wont win us single handedly the league title, but as one of a couple midfield signings, perfect.
These types have a place in every squad, as football is a team game. I feel he could flourish here.
I know he is not that exciting for most, expensive English midfielder, not flamboyant and fancy, boring even. But i think we need to go back to basics and have a fundament for our squad, with some 'honest' quality players, that improve our weaknesses. You also have to add your attacking match winners and excellent technical players, but one doesn't exclude the other, as we have 11 players on the pitch.
Lyon won 7 league titles and reached the CL quarterfinals 3 times while he was there. Are we really comparing Lyon to Southampton?Sounds like Juninho too.
Bingo. I was clearly talking about the circumstances of the potential transfer. Even the poster who responded knew that.But the original poster didn’t necessarily say he was talking about player qualities when comparing him to Charlie Adam. If we’re talking about player qualities, neither Adam or Juninho make much sense. At least with Adam you can see the similarity in terms of making a step up at a similar age from a lower premier league team.
I wasn't called out. The poster merely asked a question. It's not that serious.We're looking at player qualities here.
The insinuation that he's Charlie Adam is just a daft and lazy one. He was rightly called out for it.
Literally did and you complained it was lazy and daft. Not much to clarify and even the poster who responded understood the comparison.He said he'd be like an Adam signing, to insinuate that he'd flop for us like Adam did for Liverpool. He could have been a Juninho signing who on hindsight would've been a snip for a top club.
Maybe the poster can clarify themselves.
James Ward Prowse = Thiago Vigilante Bravo. Lets call him Thiago.If he had a brazilian name everyone would want him. He is good enough for the next step. Would really like us to get him
Not to mention his very average defensive stats (in Hassenhuttl’s mental pressing side too where you’d expect pressures and interceptions to be higher) and his very poor dribbling and progression stats on the ball. Saw someone say he’s better than Hargreaves ever was. Wild.
His only standout trait genuinely is his set piece ability, which is absolutely world class. But we need way more in central midfield right now.
Another English player is always the solution
We'd probably sign him then take him off set piece duty.
Surprised by these comments.
In my experience, it is sometimes useful to watch a player closer to learn «how» to read his stats purposely. I really like James Ward-Prowse and have for a long time. The reason being the following:
A) Quick feets and works very, very hard. I’ve missed that in our side for years (admittely, Fred has quick feets and work rate).
B) Very solid technically and smart. Makes him press resistant. Barely ever lose the ball in his own half.
C) He is very effective on the ball. Particularly with his passing of the ball. By that I mean that he quickly pass the ball to a better option than himself. It makes him a good player in build-up and in transition from defence to attack. A bit like Scholes of the late 00’ or even Carrick.
This is three qualities worth looking for in a midfielder. It is what Klopp saw in someone like Henderson making him a key player at Liverpool. The set-piece part is just a bonus in my mind. But it is a great bonus!
And if you look at his stats, I do think they prove that he is very good in all these areas.
A) His «tackle + interception» stat is not great. Watching him play I really find that weird. But watching his stat I notice that he makes 11,58 «ball recoveries» per 90 min and is in the 81st percentile in the PL in thag regard.
Fred and McT makes more tackles and interceptions. But neither makes more «ball recoveries» per 90 min with
B) 0,31 miscontrols per 90 min. Putting him in the 97th percentile in the PL. 0,83 for «dispossessed» putting him in the 71st percentile.
Fred and McT «miscontrols» the ball 1,43 and 1,15 times per 90 min. Looks like a small difference, but it is close to four and five times as often. They are dispossessed 1,29 and 1,23 ti
C) His passing numbers are quite low, but remember, passing numbers usually reflect the teams approach. JWP only completes 46,30 passes per 90 min. But that is more than any other player at Soton.
His completion rate is only 77,5 %. But that is above the squad average at Southampton of 75 %. And in JWPs numbers there are also set-pieces. Meaning, he beats the squad average while also being their creative force (xA of 0,18, 89th percentile in tve PL).
How does it show up in his stats that he is a pretty good player during transitions? Well, despite the midfielders not having the ball that much he makes;
- 3,36 switches per 90 min. Putting him in the 92nd percentile. Is switches a good thing? Well, Scholes did tham all the time and so do Liverpool. If you have players with the passing ability of JWP, it is a great tool!
- His progressive passing distance is 273 yards per 90 min. In the 88th percentile. Despite only being in the 66th percentile for passes completed. In other words, each pass moves, on average, 5,93 yards forward.
Fred and McT makes 1,95 and 1,53 switches per game. And JWP, on average, move the ball 20-25 % further forward with each pass than the two.
I’ve compared him to McT and Fred since they are our players. But the one he really remind me of is Henderson. But I like JWP better. Both technically and physically. Henderson might be bigger and stronger, but JWP is quicker with even more intensity. On the ball he just seems more nimble in my opinion. More Scholes. And he is never injured.
Looking at their stats, I really do think, considering the context of the one playing for Southampton and the other player for Klopp, that JWP looks just as good. The one big advantage of Henderson is flair from open play. But I bet you, that is down to Henderson playing for a very, very good team.
JWP is four-five years younger than Henderson. Basically never injured. Considering what Henderson have done for Liverpool for the past five years, I would be really interested in a player that could do something similar for us. That being said, I dont think we can afford to make him a priority, and that really is a shame.
Would not be surprised at all if Liverpool went and got him.
Brilliant post. We just have to stop judging players based on nationality, the club and " pure stats with out the context"Surprised by these comments.
In my experience, it is sometimes useful to watch a player closer to learn «how» to read his stats purposely. I really like James Ward-Prowse and have for a long time. The reason being the following:
A) Quick feets and works very, very hard. I’ve missed that in our side for years (admittely, Fred has quick feets and work rate).
B) Very solid technically and smart. Makes him press resistant. Barely ever lose the ball in his own half.
C) He is very effective on the ball. Particularly with his passing of the ball. By that I mean that he quickly pass the ball to a better option than himself. It makes him a good player in build-up and in transition from defence to attack. A bit like Scholes of the late 00’ or even Carrick.
This is three qualities worth looking for in a midfielder. It is what Klopp saw in someone like Henderson making him a key player at Liverpool. The set-piece part is just a bonus in my mind. But it is a great bonus!
And if you look at his stats, I do think they prove that he is very good in all these areas.
A) His «tackle + interception» stat is not great. Watching him play I really find that weird. But watching his stat I notice that he makes 11,58 «ball recoveries» per 90 min and is in the 81st percentile in the PL in thag regard.
Fred and McT makes more tackles and interceptions. But neither makes more «ball recoveries» per 90 min with
B) 0,31 miscontrols per 90 min. Putting him in the 97th percentile in the PL. 0,83 for «dispossessed» putting him in the 71st percentile.
Fred and McT «miscontrols» the ball 1,43 and 1,15 times per 90 min. Looks like a small difference, but it is close to four and five times as often. They are dispossessed 1,29 and 1,23 ti
C) His passing numbers are quite low, but remember, passing numbers usually reflect the teams approach. JWP only completes 46,30 passes per 90 min. But that is more than any other player at Soton.
His completion rate is only 77,5 %. But that is above the squad average at Southampton of 75 %. And in JWPs numbers there are also set-pieces. Meaning, he beats the squad average while also being their creative force (xA of 0,18, 89th percentile in tve PL).
How does it show up in his stats that he is a pretty good player during transitions? Well, despite the midfielders not having the ball that much he makes;
- 3,36 switches per 90 min. Putting him in the 92nd percentile. Is switches a good thing? Well, Scholes did tham all the time and so do Liverpool. If you have players with the passing ability of JWP, it is a great tool!
- His progressive passing distance is 273 yards per 90 min. In the 88th percentile. Despite only being in the 66th percentile for passes completed. In other words, each pass moves, on average, 5,93 yards forward.
Fred and McT makes 1,95 and 1,53 switches per game. And JWP, on average, move the ball 20-25 % further forward with each pass than the two.
I’ve compared him to McT and Fred since they are our players. But the one he really remind me of is Henderson. But I like JWP better. Both technically and physically. Henderson might be bigger and stronger, but JWP is quicker with even more intensity. On the ball he just seems more nimble in my opinion. More Scholes. And he is never injured.
Looking at their stats, I really do think, considering the context of the one playing for Southampton and the other player for Klopp, that JWP looks just as good. The one big advantage of Henderson is flair from open play. But I bet you, that is down to Henderson playing for a very, very good team.
JWP is four-five years younger than Henderson. Basically never injured. Considering what Henderson have done for Liverpool for the past five years, I would be really interested in a player that could do something similar for us. That being said, I dont think we can afford to make him a priority, and that really is a shame.
Would not be surprised at all if Liverpool went and got him.
Good analysis. I think Hassenhutl is of the German 'vertical' football school which doesn't place a high value on possession retention.
Brilliant post. We just have to stop judging players based on nationality, the club and " pure stats with out the context"
I never understand Caf members worrying about other people's money!
Well if in the long run we need to offload the likes of AWB, Maguire, Rashford and McTominay we'll need to keep our home grown quota topped up.Another English player is always the solution
https://www.coachesvoice.com/cv/james-ward-prowse-southampton-ralph-hasenhuttl/
This too is worth a read.
“He is one of the best midfield players in the Premier League,” Hasenhüttl said. “He is not only fantastic at free-kicks, but he also displays a massive workload every game. He can run more than any other player. He is robust. He is gifted. He is technical. He is very, very smart.”
This is the type of signing Klopp have made a bunch of since coming to Liverpool. An established PL-player from an average/below average side.
When played against us he showed exactly what we was missing. Energy and gile whilst technically good. Would be a good signing to play in a two.
Always recommended him to my Arsenal supporting mates. So I can’t turn my nose.
Overpay for one player and we’re saddled with him for years, and forced to milk every drop out of him even if he isn’t any good, like we’re doing with Maguire. It also means we’ll be able to buy less players. I couldn’t care less what the Glazers do with their money but I’m interested in what they do with the club’s.I never understand Caf members worrying about other people's money!
I was literally about to post about how he’s a bit like Henderson… top post this!Surprised by these comments.
In my experience, it is sometimes useful to watch a player closer to learn «how» to read his stats purposely. I really like James Ward-Prowse and have for a long time. The reason being the following:
A) Quick feets and works very, very hard. I’ve missed that in our side for years (admittely, Fred has quick feets and work rate).
B) Very solid technically and smart. Makes him press resistant. Barely ever lose the ball in his own half.
C) He is very effective on the ball. Particularly with his passing of the ball. By that I mean that he quickly pass the ball to a better option than himself. It makes him a good player in build-up and in transition from defence to attack. A bit like Scholes of the late 00’ or even Carrick.
This is three qualities worth looking for in a midfielder. It is what Klopp saw in someone like Henderson making him a key player at Liverpool. The set-piece part is just a bonus in my mind. But it is a great bonus!
And if you look at his stats, I do think they prove that he is very good in all these areas.
A) His «tackle + interception» stat is not great. Watching him play I really find that weird. But watching his stat I notice that he makes 11,58 «ball recoveries» per 90 min and is in the 81st percentile in the PL in thag regard.
Fred and McT makes more tackles and interceptions. But neither makes more «ball recoveries» per 90 min with
B) 0,31 miscontrols per 90 min. Putting him in the 97th percentile in the PL. 0,83 for «dispossessed» putting him in the 71st percentile.
Fred and McT «miscontrols» the ball 1,43 and 1,15 times per 90 min. Looks like a small difference, but it is close to four and five times as often. They are dispossessed 1,29 and 1,23 ti
C) His passing numbers are quite low, but remember, passing numbers usually reflect the teams approach. JWP only completes 46,30 passes per 90 min. But that is more than any other player at Soton.
His completion rate is only 77,5 %. But that is above the squad average at Southampton of 75 %. And in JWPs numbers there are also set-pieces. Meaning, he beats the squad average while also being their creative force (xA of 0,18, 89th percentile in tve PL).
How does it show up in his stats that he is a pretty good player during transitions? Well, despite the midfielders not having the ball that much he makes;
- 3,36 switches per 90 min. Putting him in the 92nd percentile. Is switches a good thing? Well, Scholes did tham all the time and so do Liverpool. If you have players with the passing ability of JWP, it is a great tool!
- His progressive passing distance is 273 yards per 90 min. In the 88th percentile. Despite only being in the 66th percentile for passes completed. In other words, each pass moves, on average, 5,93 yards forward.
Fred and McT makes 1,95 and 1,53 switches per game. And JWP, on average, move the ball 20-25 % further forward with each pass than the two.
I’ve compared him to McT and Fred since they are our players. But the one he really remind me of is Henderson. But I like JWP better. Both technically and physically. Henderson might be bigger and stronger, but JWP is quicker with even more intensity. On the ball he just seems more nimble in my opinion. More Scholes. And he is never injured.
Looking at their stats, I really do think, considering the context of the one playing for Southampton and the other player for Klopp, that JWP looks just as good. The one big advantage of Henderson is flair from open play. But I bet you, that is down to Henderson playing for a very, very good team.
JWP is four-five years younger than Henderson. Basically never injured. Considering what Henderson have done for Liverpool for the past five years, I would be really interested in a player that could do something similar for us. That being said, I dont think we can afford to make him a priority, and that really is a shame.
Would not be surprised at all if Liverpool went and got him.
A. I’ll have to pay more attention because I’ve certainly never thought Ward Prowse was particularly fleet footed under the press (which I’m assuming is what ‘quick feets’ means). Work rate can be bought from plenty of options.
Edson Alvarez.I also think it is worth remembering, EtH has not utilised a Rodri/Fabinho-type at all.
A. I’ll have to pay more attention because I’ve certainly never thought Ward Prowse was particularly fleet footed under the press (which I’m assuming is what ‘quick feets’ means). Work rate can be bought from plenty of options.
B. Sort of the same point as point A, and merits the same sort of response? Again, I’ve never seen anything from Ward Prowse to suggest he plays well under the press. Better than McTominay, sure. Low barometer, mind.
C. Lots of people are making this “pass the ball to better players point” — we don’t have the ‘better player’ in situ already. The Henderson comparison might be apt because Henderson has players like Trent (who does the heavy creative lifting) and Thiago (who does the insane ball retention). We have maybe the former with Bruno, if he ever hits his level again. We don’t have the Thiago, and that’s the midfielder we need to target first.
His ball recovery stats are inflated because he plays in a mental vertical Hassenhuttl system. Transition central. His tackle and interception stats are poor because he isn’t particularly good at defending, it’s clearly not what he excels at.
Miscontrols is genuinely a stat I have never even heard anybody talk of. His dispossessed stat is nice, but then it’s probably also assisted by the fact he doesn’t dribble or carry the ball at all (21st and 29th percentile for both of those). Easier to keep the ball if you don’t try and move with it!
I’d expect him to make the most passes in his side, and yeah you’re right they would be higher if he was elsewhere. The extremely low passing percentage for a central midfield, even with consideration to the fact he takes set pieces (wouldn’t skewer his stat THAT much) and Hassenhuttl’s aforementioned system.
I’m not sure ‘switches’ are as useful a stat as you’re making out. Liverpool play a very specific way. Will Ten Hag want to play with constant switches of play?
——
JWP is a good PL player. At 27 years old though he’s not suddenly going to burst into life and take us up a notch. And more importantly the price he’d cost with 4 years left on his contract just isn’t worth it.
Maybe Liverpool will look at signing at him. And he’d make more sense for Liverpool than us for the reasons mentioned above.
We need a different profile of midfielder as our priority. Once we get that player in, maybe JWP can be an option.
James Ward Prowse = Thiago Vigilante Bravo. Lets call him Thiago.