- Joined
- May 24, 2017
- Messages
- 673
Just bid(ing) our timeI 'bid' you a good day sir!
Just bid(ing) our timeI 'bid' you a good day sir!
@Amadaeus can identify a con artist by smelling their cocks when they are out is the new thing we learnt overnight. Here I was thinking he only sniffs & sucks Poch's.
This is hilarious! The salt from rival fans while he's live!
I’m not going to keep repeating this over and over again. I've previously explained this in another post, can't be bothered posting it again. Maybe ask Aubameyang what he thinks of your precious Zorc.What exactly Zorc is doing wrong from Dortmund perspective?
Doesn't want to sell player? Shame on him. Wants to sell him for best price? Shame on him again.
Of course they`ll brief this because we`re yet to make a bid and Sancho is yet to push for a move which won`t happen till we bid. Still some way left to go with this sagahttps://bvbbuzz.com/2020/09/10/borussia-dortmund-will-not-entertain-offers-jadon-sancho/
Sancho transfer saga is still only in England.
10000% not happening, you can put it in the bank..
Apparently works for German media.
Sancho will need to submit a transfer request, that much is clear.
This has been explained months ago.what confuses me is that our briefing was to confirm
1. We got an agreement with Sancho 2 days ago on personal terms 2. Sancho is now "pushing the deal". So BVB decided the sancho deal was dead a month ago, we decide to brief 2 days ago that we just agreed player terms. This cannot be to save face because it makes woodward look like a complete idiot, and even he's not stupid enough to miss that contradiction. So the only logical answer is that we briefed the press to get Sancho to go public. If BVB are pounding it into their mouthpieces that "the deal is dead" and we are briefing we agreed terms 2 days ago, it can only be about Sancho making a public move right?
Woodward cannot be that stupid, surely even the simplest person would question why we announced a player agreement 2 days ago for a deal that allegedly was "not possible" a month ago. Can anyone else give me another explanation?
Spoofer, seems to think the contract extension happened recently, when it happened a year ago.
Pretty much this. Dortmund can say the deal is dead all they like - until the point we actually make the move.we couldn't have negotiated with Sancho and his agents without their consent, so their whole "the deal is dead" posturing means little. In the end, we'll make an offer, they'll reject it and then Sancho has to force it. Dortmund can vilify him publicly and we get the player, everybody wins.
Who said it was dead a month ago? Not United. Seems to be the agent fees were agreed, and that was the brief, the club probably briefed it to get the wheels moving a bit on the transfer itself.Right? That is literally the only way our briefing makes sense? How can we agree personal terms with a player 2 days ago, for a deal that was allegedly dead a month ago?
I’m not sure what you’re on about. Multiple transfers every year happen like this. Dortmund, the same club that consistently sell their best players to their direct rivals, wouldn’t sell to us if the price is right? And their fans who’ve heard it all before in world football would be as outraged as United fans if we sold Greenwood to Liverpool?They agreed a deal with you. Maybe they already had weeks ago. But even if the break through occurred now, you're interpreting much into it. It's absolutely possible that the negotiations with Sancho's camp are absolutely independent from those with Dortmund.
If you make them an offer they can't refuse, obviously they will. But I doubt that number will be 120m now. I even doubt they'd sell for 130m at this point. You'd have to do something really crazy.
The alternative is that Dortmund bluffed and you correctly predicted it. I was completely sure that was impossible until yesterday and still lack the imagination that it might happen to be honest. The outrage of Dortmund fans would be similar to you selling Greenwood to Liverpool at this stage.
They said the same about Dembele and Aubameyang before selling them in the closing stages of the window. It means nothing.
we've wasted our entire 'summer' on a dead parrot deal. We now have a week to find alternatives from clubs who will know we are desperate. Most likely our summer business is done and we should just crack on with the fight for 4th, 5th, 6th with Arsenal, Wolves and Spurs
I needed that dose of positivity. Thanks mateThey said the same about Dembele and Aubameyang before selling them in the closing stages of the window. It means nothing.
Regarding the bolded bit. I think it's a mix of things.Pretty much this. Dortmund can say the deal is dead all they like - until the point we actually make the move.
I still don't really understand WHY we haven't made an official move yet, there has to be a reason? I think we are waiting until the last moment for them to either - find a proper replacement / scare them into selling for the lowest price possible.
Will we cave in and pay them £120m euros? Will they adjust and accept bonuses? it's the fact that nobody really knows the reason which is frustrating.
I assume the stumbling point is they want 120m euros guaranteed where as we want to pay them in bonuses.
I still find annoying that people don't get it or try not to. Its not like we're trying to get Sancho from Real Madrid, Barcelona, City etc where when they say they won't sell for any price you have to take it seriously.I’m not sure what you’re on about. Multiple transfers every year happen like this. Dortmund, the same club that consistently sell their best players to their direct rivals, wouldn’t sell to us if the price is right? And their fans who’ve heard it all before in world football would be as outraged as United fans if we sold Greenwood to Liverpool?
What am I reading?
Why would you discard the possibility that terms have actually been agreed with Sancho?This briefing will go down as a similar lie as "urgent transfer business" from ed if utd don't submit any type of bid.
This briefing will go down as a similar lie as "urgent transfer business" from ed if utd don't submit any type of bid.
Because Romano has been saying the same has been agreed a long time ago. Nothing specific about utd bid, no details about how much Woodward is willing to pay etc. Still hopeful that there will be some positive update very soon, otherwise I will consider this as a pure media game from Ed.Why would you discard the possibility that terms have actually been agreed with Sancho?