Yes, further proof Southgate is useless. Playing about 7 DM’s and takes off one of his only attackers where they’ve created nothing.Took off after 60mins. Do we read into this?
Yes, further proof Southgate is useless. Playing about 7 DM’s and takes off one of his only attackers where they’ve created nothing.Took off after 60mins. Do we read into this?
Reading that his bonuses were agreed at his contract renewal last year. If so, Dortmund are paying him £1.5m then he will go. What mugs!
England on the way to a defeat even in that game. Buttler and Morgan massive misses.Wow wow wow, it’s never that bad, never.
I don’t think that’s hugely mitigating. Surely he’s can influence a game without the need to rely on his teammates? He got on the ball plenty of times but offered zero output after.Had two very mediocre appearances for England in this Nations league but England have been pretty shit all round.
Yeah but Rashid was amazing. Was a treat to Watch him for those 15 mins.England on the way to a defeat even in that game. Buttler and Morgan massive misses.
Must admit this game is the most I’ve watched him and he didn’t do much. As you say though, everyone has been crap. Kane, Sterling and TAA haven’t done anything either so I’m not reading into it at all. Still on full muppet mode.Had two very mediocre appearances for England in this Nations league but England have been pretty shit all round.
Excuses? your demanding us spend more money on a player than any premier league club has ever spent on a player, taking our summer spending close to 160million at a time when the worlds finances are crumbling and United are not immune to it. The financial times said our finances were in the red in May. Our debt has been publically shown to be on the rise and we are about to go into a season where there is a very real chance we will have no fans in the stadium for the whole thing. Sorry but not agreeing to break transfer records, under those circumstances, is not an excuse is showing that he is not prepared to risk the club's finances in this period.Don't be silly, Woody is a Liverpool employee.
That's the PR Woody will be going with, yes. And he may get away with it if everyone bought it the way you do.
Spurs have spent ~50m, City are on ~30m with Koulibaly yet to come, Leeds have spent ~60m, Everton ~45m and more to come, Chelsea have spent ~150m already (they signed Kovacic and Pulisic from last year's budget before you give me a transfer ban excuse).
All of them are affected by similar constraints, all of them rake in less revenue than United and most of them have a higher transfer fee to income ratio this season than United do.
Ambitious clubs take the initiative when they see an opportunity to get ahead. I think Ole would rather have Sancho now if it means a quiet window next summer, because this opportunity to sign a top top player doesn't usually present itself to modern day United (since SAF, Pogba is the only world class signing we made where we had to compete with other clubs for a signature).
You can listen to excuses and be content that we let another golden chance to stay at the top slip away or you can hold people accountable to their failures to make resources translate to success.
To be fair, England's midfield has no creativity. Kane and Sterling have been no better. So yes, it is mitigating.I don’t think that’s hugely mitigating. Surely he’s can influence a game without the need to rely on his teammates?
If you look at Kane, he’s done less in the two games than Sancho has. It doesn’t take away the fact he’s still a world class striker.I don’t think that’s hugely mitigating. Surely he’s can influence a game without the need to rely on his teammates? He got on the ball plenty of times but offered zero output after.
Two of the best players in the prem (Kane and Sterling) have been pretty dire as well. This team has no movement and no creativity. I mean you just have to look at United to see that sometimes the way the manager has you playing can stifle even the best of players.I don’t think that’s hugely mitigating. Surely he’s can influence a game without the need to rely on his teammates? He got on the ball plenty of times but offered zero output after.
Zero combination play between the midfield and attackers. No chains, no recycling of the ball and no point trying any kind of pass and go, which is the bread and butter of both Sterling and Sancho.Front three starved of meaningful possession. This England team reminds me of us prior to signing Bruno. Without Pogba in the side, we had no player capable of giving our toward players the opportunity to cause some issues.
To be fair, England's midfield has no creativity. Kane and Sterling have been no better. So yes, it is mitigating.
I think we should stop making excuses. Kane might also have been crap but a CF is totally dependent on his wingmen.If you look at Kane, he’s done less in the two games than Sancho has. It doesn’t take away the fact he’s still a world class striker.
This whole setup is terrible for england. No flow to anyone’s game.
How do you injure yourself playing cricket?I don’t think that’s hugely mitigating. Surely he’s can influence a game without the need to rely on his teammates? He got on the ball plenty of times but offered zero output after.
England remind me of United under Jose.Zero combination play between the midfield and attackers. No chains, no recycling of the ball and no point trying any kind of pass and go, which is the bread and butter of both Sterling and Sancho.
Southgate couldn't sabotage his frontline more if he tried.
The more relevant question would be how many times have you watched him? Be honest.Everytime I watch him he just never seems to impress.
Should we be concerned spending over 100m on Sancho?!
Two of the best players in the prem (Kane and Sterling) have been pretty dire as well. This team has no movement and no creativity. I mean you just have to look at United to see that sometimes the way the manager has you playing can stifle even the best of players.
Sancho suffered the same way VdB did last night . Both are very good players but need a system and Quality around them
Many different ways. cricket is played with a very hard small ball, and fast bowlers throw the ball at batsman at 90+mph.How do you injure yourself playing cricket?
One of the best strikers and best wingers in the league also played in those games and had little to no impact. Wouldn’t read much into it at all personallyI don’t think that’s hugely mitigating. Surely he’s can influence a game without the need to rely on his teammates? He got on the ball plenty of times but offered zero output after.
express going with it as well
express going with it as well
In all honesty, possibly around ten full games including the ones after Lockdown.The more relevant question would be how many times have you watched him? Be honest.
express going with it as well
Grealish not starting as an attacking midfielder in this game is sabotaging any chance of a victory on the part of Southgate.
Which part doesn’t make sense?This story doesn't make much sense at all
Sancho's "Who To Follow" suggestions will just be a load of balding, middle aged men in shorts and a Tobias Funke parody account.Whats that gormless Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime problem with Grealish? Why didn't he start him? Joker.
Anyone know why Sancho got taken off?
Also interesting to hear Mike Phelan has followed Sancho on Instagram.
Which part doesn’t make sense?
I doubt it’s true but I’m assuming it wouldn’t be Dortmund waiting. It would be his agent delaying moving him on until he’s eligible for this bonus.For Dortmund to wait until Sancho gets his bonus.
This story doesn't make much sense at all
He's been underwhelming for England full stop !Had two very mediocre appearances for England in this Nations league but England have been pretty shit all round.
For Dortmund to wait until Sancho gets his bonus.