- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
- Messages
- 194
Now that the season's over and done with, I hope we sign him.
Weekend has passed, NYSE is open, I'm ready.
Crap, it’s off then.I fully think that the reason he’s not signed yet is because Ed has vowed to sign him the first day that nobody posts ‘Happy Sancho Day’
Ah yeah, you're right, it will open in a few hours.In the middle of the night?
Our sole reason for reaching top 4 was to get Sancho....okSo all that sweat and tears to get in top four was pretty much a waste. I truly thought having pulled it off, we would be able to attract the stars we need. I forgot what a total tosser Woodward is, what a complete mess the club set-up is really in (90 years on we will still be "looking to appoint a DoF).
What a waste to time (doing no other transfer work while this was going on). It honestly looks like the hierarchy is happy with top-four finish and not interested in actually mounting a challenge for title. The current squad isn't strong enough to go deep into the CL either.
These days, the chance for United to sign top-class stars isn't what it used to be. So many other clubs with big money. Total feck-up. What a disgrace
I agree with the sentiment but if you look at it this way, we aren’t going to win the CL next season, effectively it is a much more important achievement in a sense of retaining tv revenue and sponsorship and signing top level players.Our sole reason for reaching top 4 was to get Sancho....ok
Few things here. To begin, I'm yet to see reliable reports to suggest they want 120m up front? That's a ridiculous sentiment that I believe has originated from Fab's tweet a few days ago about them not accepting ridiculous instalments. If they wanted 120m up front in this environment, we would not be negotiating with them (if we even still are). They would want respectable instalments which would amount to the 120m, which is very reasonable for a player of his qualities.
We can afford him, but we would rightly stretch out negotiations on demanding upfront fees. Especially in this environment, it's simple business sense to do so. It's quite rare for massive transfers to be paid upfront, are you mad?!If we are going to be pedantic, if we couldn't afford him, we would have never went into this in the first place, the board aren't stupid, they would have known how much he would have been valued at before going into this. We chose to continue pursuing him and we are choosing not to pay what is required, despite knowing his value.
The entire premise of your post re. this point, was that he was so set on moving that he'd be massively upset to the extent that he'd hold a grudge against us for not getting it done. That sounds pretty fecking desperate to me.Secondly, I've never claimed he was desperate to move. I have maintained that he would want the move though. If he didn't, he wouldn't have agreed terms with us, stayed quiet when asked publicly etc.
If Dortmund had agreed to a fee, do you really think Sancho would need to request a transfer? How do you know we've had no other approaches rejected? As per Romano for example, we touted 80 + remainder over installments and it was rejected.Thirdly, 'he should push for the move if he wants to really come' is a nonsense argument. We haven't agreed a fee with Dortmund. It's hardly as if Dortmund are just refusing to let the lad go. They gave us a figure, we haven't bid anything close to it, why would he risk ruining his relationship with his current employer for a club that doesn't even seem interested in him enough to put forward a respectable bid? Not to add, he has a lot to thank Dortmund for, which is more incentive for him not to act up.
It really won't.Also as I've already said, it won't be the be all and end all for him joining us next summer, but It would for sure be something he considers if he does have multiple suitors, offering similar terms and similar, if not better, progression. If anyone was offered a job with more pay, somewhere they've wanted to work for years. You're told you got the job, only for it to fall through because they don't value you enough. It would annoy anyone. Even if you were happy at your current job.
It's obvious this is something we don't agree on though, so let's leave it here, can't be arsed discussing
I agree with the sentiment but if you look at it this way, we aren’t going to win the CL next season, effectively it is a much more important achievement in a sense of retaining tv revenue and sponsorship and signing top level players.
The latter being more important to the average fan.
If we waste this transfer window it will be criminal. Next year will be a struggle once fatigue kicks in again, we may not achieve top four again next season without top additions to the squad. So everything we worked for this year could be wasted.
So all that sweat and tears to get in top four was pretty much a waste. I truly thought having pulled it off, we would be able to attract the stars we need. I forgot what a total tosser Woodward is, what a complete mess the club set-up is really in (90 years on we will still be "looking to appoint a DoF).
What a waste to time (doing no other transfer work while this was going on). It honestly looks like the hierarchy is happy with top-four finish and not interested in actually mounting a challenge for title. The current squad isn't strong enough to go deep into the CL either.
These days, the chance for United to sign top-class stars isn't what it used to be. So many other clubs with big money. Total feck-up. What a disgrace
I guess the club isn't bigger than players in your opinion these days?
If we didn't get Sancho I'd imagine we'd end the transfer window with alternative signings. I don't think our window will be Sancho or bust.If we don’t get Sancho what even is the point of playing in the Champions League?
If we didn't get Sancho I'd imagine we'd end the transfer window with alternative signings. I don't think our window will be Sancho or bust.
Why? I mean it's pretty far-fetched to suggest Sancho is going to magically win us the Champions League in the first place.Yeah but the Champions League matches would still be redundant?
If we didn't get Sancho I'd imagine we'd end the transfer window with alternative signings. I don't think our window will be Sancho or bust.
If we don’t get Sancho what even is the point of playing in the Champions League?
Why? I mean it's pretty far-fetched to suggest Sancho is going to magically win us the Champions League in the first place.
To be fair I can understand the frustration and senti. So much emphasis put on qualifying and for what? Our focus should be always footballing achievements not financial. The latter should support the former.Our sole reason for reaching top 4 was to get Sancho....ok
Less related to Champions League, but I'd be happy with Grealish + 2 others if it came to it. I'm sick and tired of of seeing us be upheld to silly demands on transfer activity, so Dortmund can feck off if they really want close to the full fee all upfront.The issue is the level of player being touted as alternative investments.
Brooks, Dembele even, all have a massive problems, add in we might go strengthen other areas with bang average players, or pay a United tax on Grealish, Rice, etc.
It's hard to tell! The above reply looks genuine! Well played @PexboEither get some coffee down you or turn on your sarcasm detector.
Sancho isn't alone what turns us into contenders next season, but he's obviously a very vital and key piece of the puzzle, and it seems Ole agrees.
Less related to Champions League, but I'd be happy with Grealish + 2 others if it came to it. I'm sick and tired of of seeing us be upheld to silly demands on transfer activity, so Dortmund can feck off if they really want close to the full fee all upfront.
It's hard to tell! The above reply looks genuine! Well played @Pexbo
Love a WUM!If we don’t get Sancho what even is the point of playing in the Champions League?
I assumed Pexbo was on the wind up has to be said.Less related to Champions League, but I'd be happy with Grealish + 2 others if it came to it. I'm sick and tired of of seeing us be upheld to silly demands on transfer activity, so Dortmund can feck off if they really want close to the full fee all upfront.
It's hard to tell! The above reply looks genuine! Well played @Pexbo
We all agree with this but the issue is spend £108m on Sancho or
3 x £30/40m transfers? e.g. CB, backup CM, RW (Brooks, Costa) - will that improve us that much?
OR
We get Sancho which will most definitely improve us and sell 3 players and get 1 more backup player?
Just a question, the 120 million fee, does it include his wages/bonuses during the contract period?
No, this is the sticking point, total costs with agents fees and salary is supposed to be 200mJust a question, the 120 million fee, does it include his wages/bonuses during the contract period?
Nope. Just the fee to Dortmund to let him leave before his contract ends.
No, this is the sticking point, total costs with agents fees and salary is supposed to be 200m
The fact BD are trying to force us to use an agent of their chosing for negotiations they expect us to pay for fully is taking the piss. Then Sancho's agent will want his fee as well.No, this is the sticking point, total costs with agents fees and salary is supposed to be 200m
Well if that happens and we sack Ole as a result of not being backed I genuinely think I might be done with the club, in the sense that I can't invest as much time and emotional attachment as I do currently until the current owners have moved on.Not how the board will see it, the hope will be that we can scrape top 4. If we do that, job done.
just pay the money and get this one over the line, and get rid of deadwood at the club to compensate. Simples.
Yes he is. Check his numbers across Europe and he's right up there, he's feckin 20 years old so his peak isn't even going to hit until what 7 years time?Thank you gentlemen, damn 200 mill for Sancho, I mean the highlights are great but is he really worth that amount? if we get 2 midfielders for 80 mil each that would still be good, I mean Bruno cost in that region and he looked great value for money honestly... I miss the days where we scout an unknown player and he turns out a Chicharito for example, we are paying over the odds just because we are Manchester United
Yes he is. Check his numbers across Europe and he's right up there, he's feckin 20 years old so his peak isn't even going to hit until what 7 years time?
The best players are 'Covid-Discount' immune (not that there is any proof that even exists), they will move for the same massive numbers between the very biggest teams.
What's the point also of lumping in his salary, what are we the Sun? Just look at the purchase price, it's fair for what we are getting. Then look at the crazy money we are paying players who he will be better than. There's your answer.
I know its just an example, but anyone even remotely interested in Costa needs their head examining.
I'd take option two all day long. Rather build slower with absolute quality, than fill gaps with player of a lower standard, exactly like a truly average player like Douglas Costa.