tenpoless
No 6-pack, just 2Pac
I bet you have an active subscription to KICKER and Bild. Mods!!! get him out of this thread!You have now significantly surpassed the Thiago thread in length with no end in sight, you madmen.
I bet you have an active subscription to KICKER and Bild. Mods!!! get him out of this thread!You have now significantly surpassed the Thiago thread in length with no end in sight, you madmen.
This isn't happening until after Europa League most likely.
Until sancho isn't at training, I don't think we will be anywhere near getting him. I also think we're going to take this down to the last weeks of the transfer window as a way to put pressure on dortmund.
Everyone knows that Sancho wants to leave. The pressure is on dortmund to sell or end up with an "unhappy" player next season.
Every person and their dog knows that we will end up paying what Dortmund want.
I can understand Ed wanting to lower the price but given past evidence, it's frustrating really.
Agreed we never learn its stupid and while this drags on it gives less time to sign other targets for other areas Ed probably wants to pay 50p up front and the rest in installments knowing himLiterally this. There is no way we will get him for £80m. So its £100m or no deal.
I think the hold up is on upfront fee and instalments. Surely, Ole will be pushing for reinforcements to be signed earlier. Why we wait till the end always baffles me.
You know what you will have to pay, you are not going to get a discount, why not get the player in so he can start working with the team and be ready for the season?
Apparently they're close to signing Jamie Bynoe-Gittens who is a 15 year old wide forward at Man City and the best English attacking talent in his age group currently.
They need to be very careful. If they price Sancho out of a move, many other younger talents will think twice about going there in the future.
They are probably already thinking about the £100 million sale of Bellingham in a year or two to mugs like us.
2017. He stayed at Atletico after they got hit with the transfer ban, and we shifted attention to Morata/Lukaku.When did the Greizmann saga happened? I honestly have no memory what so ever that we were heavily linked to him yet some people here seem to have a PTSD regarding that deal. I clearly remember the huge disappointment from the Benatia,Thiago,Dybala,De ligt etc but Greizmann?
Literally this. There is no way we will get him for £80m. So its £100m or no deal.
I think the hold up is on upfront fee and instalments. Surely, Ole will be pushing for reinforcements to be signed earlier. Why we wait till the end always baffles me.
You know what you will have to pay, you are not going to get a discount, why not get the player in so he can start working with the team and be ready for the season?
As others have pointed out, the first team is going to be away for weeks in relation to the europa league, so if the main issue is getting him in so he can start working with the first team then there's no obvious rush (unless fecking FC Copenhagen knocks us the feck out)
Secondly, people keep harping on about fecking discounts and whatnot as if you're buying a towel at a beach in spain and you're haggling over a few euros when you have your pockets full of money. How the deal is structured in terms of how much we pay up front could have a detrimental effect on our ability to bring in other players.
I guess Haaland had more negotiating power, since he was already more of an established player.I am surprised they are not getting release clauses put in like Haaland.
I can't wait for the 7th day of the 7th month of the year 7777.
When did the Greizmann saga happened? I honestly have no memory what so ever that we were heavily linked to him yet some people here seem to have a PTSD regarding that deal. I clearly remember the huge disappointment from the Benatia,Thiago,Dybala,De ligt etc but Greizmann?
So you don`t think its happening and ther`s zero hope in your eyes??
And this is not like Griezmann at all there is no transfer ban as a barrier and Thiago was a bad one yes but Sancho`s deal is so advanced to the extent where there would be VERY heavy backlash towards Woodward if it didn`t happpen
If we offload 5-6 of the players we want to get rid of - we will have covered almost his total cost after 1 year
£10-15 mil for Dalot
£15-20 mil for Lingard
£15 mil for Smalling
£5-6 mil for Jones
Mata on a free
Sanchez probably cost us £10 million to terminate contract - but we save Close to £50 million in wages
and voila - half of his fee covered by sales - and then we will probably save £700.000 in wages - which is £35 million a year
Yes, our team is going away for the Europa league. So is Man City's and they have signed 2. Whatever the case, you would rather have the player training with your squad than not, considering the next season starts in just over a month.
Yes, it could but it could also have a detrimental effect on bringing other players in. So what happens if we wait till the Europa is finished and carry on negotiations, September comes and then Dortmund say, our league is starting so its this or see you later?
We then have to go and find a replacement, in addition to other players when our league is starting.
So we will be starting the new season with the same squad, which we all know is not good enough.
We all know once leagues start, clubs are reluctant to sell players as they need replacements identified first.
You think a 15 year old will be Sancho's replacement? He wouldn't even be legally allowed to play until his next birthday
That kind of low risk high reward transfer probably runs independently of of the whole Sancho story.
I don't see us walking away from this deal if that's the case
I think some people in this thread need to understand this.
It could also be that the player have a small percentage of the transfer fee so they are happy for the transfer fee to be bigger.I guess Haaland had more negotiating power, since he was already more of an established player.
Romano now backtracking,its looks like Woodward has messed up this deal and now looks highly unlikely we will buy Sancho now.
You're the one moaning about training with the team, not me. I'd prefer the signing to be completed as early as possible, but using training with the first team as an argument when the first team is away is a bit nonsensical.
Negotiations will still be ongoing, and we aren't complete morons, we're trying to structure the deal in a way that suits us and Dortmund are obviously trying to get as much as possible in one go. If it reaches a point where Dortmund aren't budging whatsoever then we'll either have to pay up or wait until next summer.
He's not backtracking, just trying to calm people down and he's right about it, these deals don't take a day to complete.Romano now backtracking,its looks like Woodward has messed up this deal and now looks highly unlikely we will buy Sancho now.
What did he say that suggests he is backtracking?Romano now backtracking,its looks like Woodward has messed up this deal and now looks highly unlikely we will buy Sancho now.
I don't see us walking away from this deal if that's the case
I don't see us walking away from this deal if that's the case
I think some people in this thread need to understand this.