Lentwood
Full Member
The key to these transfers is not saving £10/£15m its getting them done early so that the player can settle down in his new surroundings and the manager can start planning for the season knowing what he has at his disposal
I‘ve avoided this thread because it seems like the usual transfer bubble. Is there any specific reason Sancho could want to join us? I mean reasons HE would want to join us, not why WE think he should.
357 pages so far is quite a poor amount of muppet enthusiasm for potentially our biggest £££ ever signing?!
Surely we need to up our game?
CL Football, more money, his home country, playing with friends from the national team, family and real friends on his doorstep.I‘ve avoided this thread because it seems like the usual transfer bubble. Is there any specific reason Sancho could want to join us? I mean reasons HE would want to join us, not why WE think he should.
I bloody hope so. Would be nice to have some big news to break up the week!Today's gonna be a big day. I feel it in my feelings
Sancho doesn't look a player suited to Guardiola's system and if I'm not mistaken Guardiola openly saying "Sancho wasn't up to the challenge" means he's v likely not to buy him and Sancho himself is well within his right to say "feck off then mate".I'm also not convinced this will happen. But to play both sides.... If it is true that he misses England and wants to play in the PL, then Man United is the obvious choice. He was a youth player at city, so I assume his family is based there. United now offer Champions League football. United also have a number of young players too. I've seen from his Social Media that he's often hanging around with friends who are wearing United shirts, so I'd say that's his crowd.
The other options if we wants CL football with an English team are Man City and Liverpool. And if either one went balls-deep to get him, I'd imagine they'd become favorites. But towards the end of his time at city he refused to train and didn't leave on the best terms. This was under Guardiola still, so i'd be surprised if that's a happy marriage. Also for all of city's spending, I think their record buy is still well short of what Dortmund would want for Sancho.
Liverpool - the chance to join the champions. Close to home. If they went for it, again, I can see them quickly becoming favorites. But again, I don't think Klopp is the type who'd want to spend such a chunk of his budget on one player. Especially as then, Sancho would have to be a starter when fit and it breaks up his trio of Salah, Mane and Firmino who have won him both a CL and PL in the last year. All are still in their 20's too.
I've written a lot here. So any feedback on what I said?
Not manyHow many transfers have we seen that look to be in this "formality" stage where all we're talking about "the personal terms are agreed, it's just the last details with the club" or "he'll probably have a medical on X date" - for it then to just completely fall through.
Yeah he was a solid target until it was reported he was set on elsewhere. He was a solid target for us, PSG, Juventus. We were always outside favourites in a deal, because De Ligt had no affiliation with England over the other clubs, and we weren't even in the Champions League. That is nothing like Sancho.I could probably sit here listing them for 30 minutes and still forget some. Last summer there was a space of 2 weeks where De Ligt looked like a genuine target
Pretty much of all of these are wrong. 1) It was reported that Dybala was offered by Juventus as a swap route, we were never into Dybala before that and thats why it came as such a surprise. Nothing was agreed between us and Dybala either, again which makes it completely different to Sancho. Dybala simply didn't want to leave Juventus and come to England. 2) Morata we never had fees agreed with Madrid and we clearly wanted Lukaku more, which is why he was signed before Morata went on to Chelsea. It was obvious that he was a backburner target, again nothing like Sancho. 3) Griezman at the time decided to stay with Atletico to help them with the transfer ban and move on the next year. He missed his own chance. Again, not like Sancho. We never had fees or personal terms agreed re. Griezmann. And unlike Sancho, Griezmann wanted to stay an extra year after the transfer ban news., Dybala looked like it was going to get done in a swap for Lukaku, Morata was practically done - talk of a medical, terms agreed with Madrid etc at various stage, then one day poof. Griezmann is maybe the most similar to this one, where it seemed we were just waiting for CL qualification, the player was desperate to join us... then one day the stories out of nowhere came out that United "had no interest" - and that was that.
Sanchos pattern is not like the players you named. The only pattern its falling similar to is AWB and Maguire. And probably Bruno from January too.Wouldn't surprise me at all if this follows the same pattern where something goes wrong behind the scenes, United get fed up of Dortmund not lowering the price or something. Then the "United are looking at other targets after failing to reach a breakthrough with Dortmund over the fee for Jadon Sancho." briefs.
I bloody hope so. Would be nice to have some big news to break up the week!
It all sounds to good to be true.Absolutely man. This one has a different feel about it for me too, like no denial about at a transfer from either side (only denial was about a fee) and the news from a few sources over the last couple of days that both sides are working hard to come up with an acceptable fee / structure of payments show it's definitely a go-er. Be brilliant to see the words 'Fee Agreed' today!
It all sounds to good to be true.
Agreed, it's been a while since we've had a "clear run" at someone and they look like they want to come. When you think of De ligt last year, we ultimately ended up disappointed as he chose someone else, so it's a nice change. I think the main thing for Dortmund is they like to get replacements sorted before they go ahead. When you look at how quickly the wrapped up Meunier when Hakimi wasn't an option, so I'm looking for Dortmund news to be the green light for meAbsolutely man. This one has a different feel about it for me too, like no denial about at a transfer from either side (only denial was about a fee) and the news from a few sources over the last couple of days that both sides are working hard to come up with an acceptable fee / structure of payments show it's definitely a go-er. Be brilliant to see the words 'Fee Agreed' today!
Vs weaker teams, we probably can play one of them as the #10 in a 4-2-3-1 but you probably want your midfield to be Fred/McTominay in that situation. Vs tougher teams with the assumption Bruno is unavailable, you probably push Pogba into the Bruno role.If we run out of budget and no Grealish, don't see why we cant play Greenwood/Martial/Rashford with Sancho in the Bruno role if he was injured or needed a rest?
Fergie had some massive outlays. Rooney and Rio Ferdinand were both record transfers for a teenager and a defender at the time made, a less successful example is the outlay for Veron. Ferguson's last truly great value buys were probably Vidic and Evra (and you could argue RVP, but that was an older player forcing a transfer to a particular team with one year left). The only real foundational piece he bought for us near the end was De Gea, which was a very expensive purchase for a goalie at the time. A lot of the great 07/08 team we either paid significant amounts at the time for, for key players (Rooney, Tevez Loan fee, Ferdinand), Ronaldo was really cheap in retrospect, but that was a massive fee for an unproven teenager in the market at the time or were homegrown. Even guys from within the league like Carrick we paid pretty high amounts relative to current transfer fees. The only real value buys who were in that first 11 were Vidic, VDS and Evra. Even squad options like Nani, Anderson, Hargreaves were quite expensive.100 million is far too much. Have we not been down this route enough already......Pogba, Sanchez (in wages), De Maria, etc and not one of them worth the outlay. Yet on these boards posters almost wet themselves as if spending vast sums will somehow guarantee success. I reckon Fergie had it right with going for value most times.
1. Environment.Is there any specific reason Sancho could want to join us? I mean reasons HE would want to join us, not why WE think he should.
Yeah, Dortmund has found the perfect middle ground in the market. They are a constant CL team, develop young talent, and sell them off. They keep good veterans around, its not like its only youth, but its not guys on massive wages, its people who want to play for Dortmund and in some cases go back. They attract top young talents with tons of offers to go to them, knowing they will get time and experience, and then be able to make there move to a big/rich club in 1 to 3 years time where they will get massive wages.Dortmund's strategy is to get these young players and give them game time. Once they develop and become stars, they are sold for massive amounts. Sancho is the perfect example of this right now.
So, to answer your question, it doesn't matter whether he signs for United or some other club. At this point, we are the only ones who want him and can afford him, so we are what fits the bill so to speak. He will join as a highly paid superstar and will be treated as such. Whether it is at United or some other club is really not part of the equation for him at this point.
I'm ashamed at how negative this place is now that this deal looks so likely. It's almost like people don't want nice things.
Hope you're right, because if Solskjaer identifies a target, I want him to get him.Sancho doesn't look a player suited to Guardiola's system and if I'm not mistaken Guardiola openly saying "Sancho wasn't up to the challenge" means he's v likely not to buy him and Sancho himself is well within his right to say "feck off then mate".
Liverpool can't afford Sancho at that fee and it would make terrible sense to do so. The last area on their pitch they need to improve on is a creative forward on the right.
Not many
Yeah he was a solid target until it was reported he was set on elsewhere. He was a solid target for us, PSG, Juventus. We were always outside favourites in a deal, because De Ligt had no affiliation with England over the other clubs, and we weren't even in the Champions League. That is nothing like Sancho.
Pretty much of all of these are wrong. 1) It was reported that Dybala was offered by Juventus as a swap route, we were never into Dybala before that and thats why it came as such a surprise. Nothing was agreed between us and Dybala either, again which makes it completely different to Sancho. Dybala simply didn't want to leave Juventus and come to England. 2) Morata we never had fees agreed with Madrid and we clearly wanted Lukaku more, which is why he was signed before Morata went on to Chelsea. It was obvious that he was a backburner target, again nothing like Sancho. 3) Griezman at the time decided to stay with Atletico to help them with the transfer ban and move on the next year. He missed his own chance. Again, not like Sancho. We never had fees or personal terms agreed re. Griezmann. And unlike Sancho, Griezmann wanted to stay an extra year after the transfer ban news.
Sanchos pattern is not like the players you named. The only pattern its falling similar to is AWB and Maguire. And probably Bruno from January too.
"Clubs far apart", "Personal terms agreed", Player wants move", "Fee agreed".
Guys a genuine star. He’s had double figures in goals and assists two seasons running.I'm surprised how underrated Sancho is on here oddly enough. Is it just because people haven't seen that much of him or they think everyone bought from Dortmund is an automatic flop?
I'm also not convinced this will happen. But to play both sides.... If it is true that he misses England and wants to play in the PL, then Man United is the obvious choice. He was a youth player at city, so I assume his family is based there. United now offer Champions League football. United also have a number of young players too. I've seen from his Social Media that he's often hanging around with friends who are wearing United shirts, so I'd say that's his crowd.
The other options if we wants CL football with an English team are Man City and Liverpool. And if either one went balls-deep to get him, I'd imagine they'd become favorites. But towards the end of his time at city he refused to train and didn't leave on the best terms. This was under Guardiola still, so i'd be surprised if that's a happy marriage. Also for all of city's spending, I think their record buy is still well short of what Dortmund would want for Sancho.
Liverpool - the chance to join the champions. Close to home. If they went for it, again, I can see them quickly becoming favorites. But again, I don't think Klopp is the type who'd want to spend such a chunk of his budget on one player. Especially as then, Sancho would have to be a starter when fit and it breaks up his trio of Salah, Mane and Firmino who have won him both a CL and PL in the last year. All are still in their 20's too.
I've written a lot here. So any feedback on what I said?
Once bitten twice shy.
How many transfers have we seen that look to be in this "formality" stage where all we're talking about "the personal terms are agreed, it's just the last details with the club" or "he'll probably have a medical on X date" - for it then to just completely fall through.
I could probably sit here listing them for 30 minutes and still forget some. Last summer there was a space of 2 weeks where De Ligt looked like a genuine target, Dybala looked like it was going to get done in a swap for Lukaku, Morata was practically done - talk of a medical, terms agreed with Madrid etc at various stage, then one day poof. Griezmann is maybe the most similar to this one, where it seemed we were just waiting for CL qualification, the player was desperate to join us... then one day the stories out of nowhere came out that United "had no interest" - and that was that.
Wouldn't surprise me at all if this follows the same pattern where something goes wrong behind the scenes, United get fed up of Dortmund not lowering the price or something. Then the "United are looking at other targets after failing to reach a breakthrough with Dortmund over the fee for Jadon Sancho." briefs.
But it quickly transpired (even when Lukaku came) that he was the target for us and Morata was left behind by choice (not obligation).Hope you're right, because if Solskjaer identifies a target, I want him to get him.
I do think you're talking about the failed moves in hindsight though, rather than how they were being reported at the time. For example, Morata was not once mentioned as a backburner target at the time, especially with £60-70m being the fee reported. When we agreed the fee for Lukaku, it was out of the blue.
When he said “it’s over”. I basically correlated that to him saying it’s a done deal.
The conviction in his tone is quite reassuring!
Agreed, it's been a while since we've had a "clear run" at someone and they look like they want to come. When you think of De ligt last year, we ultimately ended up disappointed as he chose someone else, so it's a nice change. I think the main thing for Dortmund is they like to get replacements sorted before they go ahead. When you look at how quickly the wrapped up Meunier when Hakimi wasn't an option, so I'm looking for Dortmund news to be the green light for me
Obviously just having a laugh mate! Anything to satisfy the muppet inside meNot sure if you're joking but it means nothing like that. He's basically saying "game over" as in the opposition won't have any chance.
Rio getting excited doesn't really add any weight to it, he's been on the Sancho train for a long time (It'll happen though)
Aye, it makes a nice change. I wanted us to get De Ligt last year but I did think that he didn't seem sure and it always felt he might end up picking another club to move to. He's coming, it's a matter of time bro
Was the De Ligt "saga" really only last year? It feels a lifetime ago.
When he said “it’s over”. I basically correlated that to him saying it’s a done deal.
The conviction in his tone is quite reassuring!
FYI the other players he mentioned that we should target were a CM such as Partey, Saul or Ndidi. As well as a CB such as Koulibaly or Ben Godfrey from Norwich.
We had as good a defence as city this season but scored nearly 40 less goals. The defence is not the bigger issue.
I would personally love to see us play with 2 Strikers in Martial & Greenwood.It also means we can play 2 in the middle if we are pummeling lower sides for a breakthrough.
A CB cant just shift over if they have Martial and Greenwood making their runs in the box and its not like we will get outnunbered in midfield since their DMs will be back covering the ball into the front 2 anyway.
Arsenal did this very well against us last season in the Xhaka weird goal game. It isolates the defence into 1 v 1 battles all across the line.
Negative reporting, love it, all part of the muppetry