DJ_21
Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Just read up that sancho scored a goal more recently at OT than Rashford, Martial and Antony. That’s embarrassing if true.
A lot of big clubs have terminated their problematic expensive stars in situations like this, "eating" the loss and preserving reputation of competence
You are spot on - United have done this to ourselves. For many years decisions were driven based on money ("we cant terminate X it is expensive") and ironically United are also horrible about money. This is the club that will cry about money and not get anybody better than Weghorst, and a summer after that waste millions on terribly overpaying for Mount, Hojlund and agreeing to premature replacement of De Gea with Onana.
Clueless, spineless, joke or a club that everybody is getting advantage of
For me it is rather the cult of personality that always gets you in these situations. Probably it is because of the unparalleled impact Ferguson had on your club but you're always looking for that one strong leader who saves you or the one player who lifts you on the next level. In this case, you have granted Ten Hag more say on transfer activities than any other manager in the world including Guardiola and Klopp. I mean, after ages you've finally adapted the best practice of implementing a DoF and shortly after you make him a lame duck again and grant the last authority over transfer activites to the head coach.
Ten Hag's seeming favoritism of Antony is arguably what started this whole story but solely looking at the conflict itself, did Sancho's misconduct really justify banning him indefinitely and demanding a walk of shame? A suspension of one or two months seem short in hindsight but at the time, it would have been seen as very strict. I mean, I struggle to recall any player who was banned by his own club for more than one game. But Ten Hag not only took it a level further, he chose to make it personal on top of it. I don't know why you allow him to roam that freely. It is an ego trip that cost the club millions already. If Dortmund didn't know that there was no way back for Sancho at United, your bargaining position would have been much, much better.
I don't think there's any other club in the world who is so focused on individuals as you. Always a player on the market that is far too good to miss out on. Immovable support of the manager. And when things go south, it turns towards the other extreme ("make an example out of Sancho and let him rot on the bench for the next two years, feck the 40+m that will cost us").
. . .Different people having different opinions?
New manager or not he should be gone. If that means a loan to try and retain some value then fair enough, but he shouldn't play for us again.
We’ve both made our views on the subject clear. Move on.As I said, readdress in the Summer under fresh management.
I agree with most of what you are saying but Ten Hag's favoritism of Antony didn't start Sancho saga.For me it is rather the cult of personality that always gets you in these situations. Probably it is because of the unparalleled impact Ferguson had on your club but you're always looking for that one strong leader who saves you or the one player who lifts you on the next level. In this case, you have granted Ten Hag more say on transfer activities than any other manager in the world including Guardiola and Klopp. I mean, after ages you've finally adapted the best practice of implementing a DoF and shortly after you make him a lame duck again and grant the last authority over transfer activites to the head coach.
Ten Hag's seeming favoritism of Antony is arguably what started this whole story but solely looking at the conflict itself, did Sancho's misconduct really justify banning him indefinitely and demanding a walk of shame? A suspension of one or two months seem short in hindsight but at the time, it would have been seen as very strict. I mean, I struggle to recall any player who was banned by his own club for more than one game. But Ten Hag not only took it a level further, he chose to make it personal on top of it. I don't know why you allow him to roam that freely. It is an ego trip that cost the club millions already. If Dortmund didn't know that there was no way back for Sancho at United, your bargaining position would have been much, much better.
I don't think there's any other club in the world who is so focused on individuals as you. Always a player on the market that is far too good to miss out on. Immovable support of the manager. And when things go south, it turns towards the other extreme ("make an example out of Sancho and let him rot on the bench for the next two years, feck the 40+m that will cost us").
Hold on. Hold on.That's hyperbole. Sancho is a very expensive footballer who is significantly underpeforming and acting immaturely, he's not a virus. Exile does nothing positive to the squad, and we have not seen any positive reaction to it. Performances on the pitch are still poor, work-rate remains an issue and a lack of standards is still apparent. It's a pointless punishment that does nothing positive for the player, the squad or the club. There's a lot you can do between letting a player get away with everything and going to the extreme of exiling him completely, and apparently refusing to interact with him.
Of course he doesn't play when he's being unprofessional or not meeting the standards, but manage the situation. Talk with him, fine public dissent, keep him out of the match squad until things resolve and work on a deal to get him out behind the scenes. Don't just exile him and not bother dealing with him at all. It doesn't help anyone and makes the player harder to get rid off - it's counter-productive.
Yet still gathered numerous England caps & a big money move back to the Premier League.I agree with most of what you are saying but Ten Hag's favoritism of Antony didn't start Sancho saga.
Sancho was known for playing Playstation all night and being late to training as far back as even during his Dortmund time and way before Ten Hag at United. Also, as much as fans hate it, all managers have favorites and it doesn't get a player permission to speak out against club and manager on Twitter, of all places.
Regardless, there will always be misunderstanding and conflict between some player and manager. The real crime here is that Ed Woodward and Ole signed Sancho on such ridiculous wages that he is virtually impossible to get rid of. Based on all of the horrible deals and insane wages Ed and United's leadership have given out, I seriously think at some point they should face legal consequences for misappropriating United money
If I could follow posters like you can follow Instagram accounts this would get the follow. Absolutely brilliantly put from an outside perspective. From beginning to end.For me it is rather the cult of personality that always gets you in these situations. Probably it is because of the unparalleled impact Ferguson had on your club but you're always looking for that one strong leader who saves you or the one player who lifts you on the next level. In this case, you have granted Ten Hag more say on transfer activities than any other manager in the world including Guardiola and Klopp. I mean, after ages you've finally adapted the best practice of implementing a DoF and shortly after you make him a lame duck again and grant the last authority over transfer activites to the head coach.
Ten Hag's seeming favoritism of Antony is arguably what started this whole story but solely looking at the conflict itself, did Sancho's misconduct really justify banning him indefinitely and demanding a walk of shame? A suspension of one or two months seem short in hindsight but at the time, it would have been seen as very strict. I mean, I struggle to recall any player who was banned by his own club for more than one game. But Ten Hag not only took it a level further, he chose to make it personal on top of it. I don't know why you allow him to roam that freely. It is an ego trip that cost the club millions already. If Dortmund didn't know that there was no way back for Sancho at United, your bargaining position would have been much, much better.
I don't think there's any other club in the world who is so focused on individuals as you. Always a player on the market that is far too good to miss out on. Immovable support of the manager. And when things go south, it turns towards the other extreme ("make an example out of Sancho and let him rot on the bench for the next two years, feck the 40+m that will cost us").
I’m a sceptic on Ineos but this is the biggest thing they must change. There’s no point bringing talent into a rotten dressing room.
Arsenal, City, Liverpool have all gotten rid of big players Arteta, Pep, or Klopp didnt want without paying half of salary of said players while that player was playing elsewhere. Do you understand how pathetic and embarassing that is? I think it is rock bottom.
Now, please tell me a single example of any big club paying half of salary of their player while that fecker was playing for another club. I dont know a single example of such bullshit
I will wait...
We could have got Bellingham with the Sancho money, correct ?
I agree with most of what you are saying but Ten Hag's favoritism of Antony didn't start Sancho saga.
Sancho was known for playing Playstation all night and being late to training as far back as even during his Dortmund time and way before Ten Hag at United. Also, as much as fans hate it, all managers have favorites and it doesn't get a player permission to speak out against club and manager on Twitter, of all places.
Regardless, there will always be misunderstanding and conflict between some player and manager. The real crime here is that Ed Woodward and Ole signed Sancho on such ridiculous wages that he is virtually impossible to get rid of. Based on all of the horrible deals and insane wages Ed and United's leadership have given out, I seriously think at some point they should face legal consequences for misappropriating United money
I think 2 things can be true here.But looks like few have problem with management for trying to fix the dressing room, yes this Sancho example is also in "rotten dressing room culture" page.
Arsenal, City, Liverpool have all gotten rid of big players Arteta, Pep, or Klopp didnt want without paying half of salary of said players while that player was playing elsewhere. Do you understand how pathetic and embarassing that is? I think it is rock bottom.
Now, please tell me a single example of any big club paying half of salary of their player while that fecker was playing for another club. I dont know a single example of such bullshit
I will wait...
Arteta got rid of Mesut Ozil, Aubameyang, and Alexandre Lacazette without paying anybody else half of their salaries.Which big players?
I think 2 things can be true here.
Some players will definitely have had their noses put out by things like, lateness being punished etc. & I personally couldn’t give a shit about them, turn up on time but I also think some probably just don’t like the tactics &/or training methods.
I’d be hesitant to conflate any player that’s not enjoying their time under EtH as ‘upset because he’s trying to fix the dressing room’.
Also a big part of management is gaining buy-in whilst you change a dressing room. See Klopp at Liverpool, he had them doing crowd waves after draws, he’d have known none of them were coming along on the ride but he gained buy-in.
This Sancho case deserves its own documentary cause it’s bizarre.
Thank youSame answer than the one I gave to @Skills, Jovic would be the closest player. Frankfurt didn't pay half of his wage when they him back on loan. And Madrid agreed to release him without fee when he moved to Fiorentina but with an agreement that they get 50% of his next move but he moved to Milan on a free transfer.
Arteta got rid of Mesut Ozil, Aubameyang, and Alexandre Lacazette without paying anybody else half of their salaries.
You can find examples for Pep and Klopp yourself, and feel free to let us know which other big club is paying half of player's salary to have that player play for somebody else?
He's a smart lad !No because he wasn't interested in coming to us.
I don't know how Real Madrid organized it but Jovic would be the best candidate for your question.
Thank you
Do we know that half of his salary was still paid by Madrid when he moved to Fiorentina, or did he just take a paycut?
Yeah, I sincerely hope Sancho does play well for Dortmund so we can sell him butArsenal paid money to Auba to terminate his contract.
Loan deal to Sancho is not a bad move at all under these circumstances. He will probably play well and then will have buyers thinking ManUtd is a spacejam club where all the talented players becomes shit.
Same answer than the one I gave to @Skills, Jovic would be the closest player. Frankfurt didn't pay half of his wage when they him back on loan. And Madrid agreed to release him without fee when he moved to Fiorentina but with an agreement that they get 50% of his next move but he moved to Milan on a free transfer.
IIRC it's a very complicated deal where he basically moves around the world on free while clubs pay part of his salary. Real Madrid originally sent him to Fiorentina on a 2 year deal, where they could take over the €6M contract at the end of that deal - while there Fiorentina would pay 50% of his salary and Real Madrid would pay 50%. Fiorentina then sent the deal to AC Milan who are paying the 50% of his salary now and Real Madrid paying 50%. At that point either AC Milan sell him on "for free" to someone willing to pay €6M a year for that final year (2025) or do that themselves.
Yeah, I sincerely hope Sancho does play well for Dortmund so we can sell him but
1. Will he play well, after sitting on his ass for 5 months?
2. Even if he plays well, nobody is going to pay his current United salary, ever. He is no Mbappe. So will he find an offer and leave even if he plays well for Dortmund?
Ridiculous take…in hindsight those we’re small clues and now we’ve got a player who obviously sees nothing wrong in doing as he pleases. In addition he’s had about 5 good games at United. He’s just been so utterly nothing it’s ridiculous.I still think those things are blown way out of proportion in hindsight. I followed Sancho very closely at Dortmund since I'm a big fan of his playstyle and while there were a few indicents, they were very minor. The "biggest" story was his start of the season in 20/21 after United's first attempt at signing him failed. People said he performed halfheartedly and wasn't fit but even then he put in at the very least decent performances and IMO was primarily criticized because he didn't score well.
And let's be honest, unpunctuality, lack of discipline or unmotivated training when the manager didn't pick the player are very common. If you want a recent example, Leroy Sané was heavily criticized by media and club last season towards the end of Nagelsmann's stint. At one point he even had to take a cab to a game because the bus departed without him after being late. After finding himself benched a couple of games, he was notorious for bad body language in training and doing exercises in energy saving mode. He currently sits at 16 scorers in 1300 Bundesliga minutes for Bayern. Neither Nagelsmann nor Tuchel criticized him publicly or suspended him for it. It's not a good attitude to have but there are numerous players like that.
Just read up that sancho scored a goal more recently at OT than Rashford, Martial and Antony. That’s embarrassing if true.
I think two things can be true…I think 2 things can be true here.
Some players will definitely have had their noses put out by things like, lateness being punished etc. & I personally couldn’t give a shit about them, turn up on time but I also think some probably just don’t like the tactics &/or training methods.
I’d be hesitant to conflate any player that’s not enjoying their time under EtH as ‘upset because he’s trying to fix the dressing room’.
Also a big part of management is gaining buy-in whilst you change a dressing room. See Klopp at Liverpool, he had them doing crowd waves after draws, he’d have known none of them were coming along on the ride but he gained buy-in.
This Sancho case deserves its own documentary cause it’s bizarre.
He turned us down. If you believe the Murtough/SAF argument story, it's because our sell was awful.We could have got Bellingham with the Sancho money, correct ?
Looks like a bit more money for United
Murtough should have been fired on the spot for that crap, if reported story is true. Not that Jude would have joined us anyway, he probably made the best move for himself, but what Murtough did was horribleHe turned us down. If you believe the Murtough/SAF argument story, it's because our sell was awful.
What exactly did Murtough do?Murtough should have been fired on the spot for that crap, if reported story is true. Not that Jude would have joined us anyway, he probably made the best move for himself, but what Murtough did was horrible
Just read up that sancho scored a goal more recently at OT than Rashford, Martial and Antony. That’s embarrassing if true.
It was a huge talking point amongst Arsenal fans, Arteta cleaned the squad by loaning every unwanted players but still paying part of their salary. And it's to be expected when you loan outside of PL clubs like most our loans were.Arteta got rid of Mesut Ozil, Aubameyang, and Alexandre Lacazette without paying anybody else half of their salaries.
You can find examples for Pep and Klopp yourself, and feel free to let us know which other big club is paying half of player's salary to have that player play for somebody else?
85% of the times he posts good content and I agree with most of his takes. But the other 15% @Zehner is rambling about his hatred towards everything BayernIf I could follow posters like you can follow Instagram accounts this would get the follow. Absolutely brilliantly put from an outside perspective. From beginning to end.
Bravo Sir. Bravo.
This big issue with this is that, in loaning him to the same club he came from, he proves nothing new. He is still just a cockwomble who couldn't cut it in the PL.
Would sending him to Italy or Spain not raise his value a bit more than back to where he came from?
Probably doesn't matter too much anyway as nobody is going to pay much for the useless dope.
it is proven that he doesn't cut it in the current Man Utd setup. It is still too soon to say he couldn't cut it in EPL. Back then people said that same on Salah when he was in Chelsea. Sancho is still very young.This big issue with this is that, in loaning him to the same club he came from, he proves nothing new. He is still just a cockwomble who couldn't cut it in the PL.