Giggsyking
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2013
- Messages
- 9,863
for 6 months.I wasn't aware his wages were only €7m.
for 6 months.I wasn't aware his wages were only €7m.
Yes, but I thought he's a top earner at United, not some peasant, who doesn't even earn €15m.
I’m not too bothered they aren’t covering his full wage. Just getting this prick out the building for the rest of the season is good enough for me.
Why is he a prick?
One of our worst signings ever. Get rid asap - whether by loan or sale, it's a good deal for United.
You been living under a rock for the last 6 months? Or do you think taking the piss out of the club is acceptable given the wage we’re paying him?
I mean that is one way to frame him accusing the manager of scapegoating him after he'd said that other players were chosen over him due to training performances.Asked you something simple, with no malice, as I thought I might have missed something recently. You didn’t really answer my question why you deem him a prick - which is within your right, to be fair.
I don’t know, he was banished from first team by the manager - I wouldn’t class that as him taking the piss out the club. I think his wages are a non-factor. The manager spoke publicly against him and he disagreed, as he doesn’t feel it was reflective of reality. The manager’s now demanding an apology, which he feels strongly enough about not to give.
Thought he’d done something substantial to be labelled a prick. Either way, parting ways seems best for all involved.
They are laughing at us. Sold him for 85m. Get him back for free and pay him only half his wages.
€3.5m is the loan fee. Wages are seperate.I wasn't aware his wages were only €7m.
€3.5m is the loan fee. Wages are seperate.
Is Murtough is still in the club? This deal smells on him. 3 mil fee for Jadon. While we payed 10 mil fee for Amrabat.
Ah I see your point. The only UK report I’ve seen that doesn’t quote Falk or Plettiberg is Ornstein in the Athletic and he doesn’t seem to mention figures.Have there been reports from English journalists? Because the German sources, that have been shared here, claim that it's the total investment by Dortmund. Of course, if they get their info from Dortmund's side, it may come with a favourable spin.
It would not matter if he does.Now watch him have a blinder.
Do you seriously think we were finding a better deal?Is Murtough is still in the club? This deal smells on him. 3 mil fee for Jadon. While we payed 10 mil fee for Amrabat.
Asked you something simple, with no malice, as I thought I might have missed something recently. You didn’t really answer my question why you deem him a prick - which is within your right, to be fair.
I don’t know, he was banished from first team by the manager - I wouldn’t class that as him taking the piss out the club. I think his wages are a non-factor. The manager spoke publicly against him and he disagreed, as he doesn’t feel it was reflective of reality. The manager’s now demanding an apology, which he feels strongly enough about not to give.
Thought he’d done something substantial to be labelled a prick. Either way, parting ways seems best for all involved.
I always back the manager in things like this. But in this case, guilt is 50:50 and owners/Ceo/Dof should have resolve this with them.Do you seriously think we were finding a better deal?
Sancho has poisoned the well. He needs out, we need to cut losses.
And you'd be spot on. Anyone with an ounce of sense and doesn't have an agenda against ETH will see it this way.My reply wasn’t a personal attack so apologies if it came across that way but I think the way he reacted to the manager’s comments and how he’s since handled himself is bang out of order.
Now I’m obviously not privy to the exact going’s on but the manager went out of his way to help Sancho when he first came in by sending him off to the Netherlands for a few months to get away from everything and sort out whatever he was going through. Since he’s returned it seems like he’s through it back in Ten Hags face by turning up late for training and half arsing it, something he’s got previous for. If the managers resorted to calling him out in public then I imagine he’s exhausted all other avenues and this is his last throw of the dice to get a response out of Sancho.
He’s then took it completely the wrong way and instead of simply apologising and knuckling down and getting himself back into contention he instead decides to sit up to all hours playing Fifa while collecting an obscene weekly wage from the club and watching his teammates struggle out on the pitch. Thats the reason I call him a prick, now I maybe wrong but that’s just the way I’m seeing the situation.
Heads should roll in the recruitment division, starting with the decision makers at the top. It's staggering that their incompetence has cost the club at least half a billion dollars over the last decade. This depreciation of Sancho's asset value alone should be a sackable offense.
Heads should roll in the recruitment division, starting with the decision makers at the top. It's staggering that their incompetence has cost the club at least half a billion dollars over the last decade. This depreciation of Sancho's asset value alone should be a sackable offense.
While it may be bad business, I believe you're being far to generous to put more than a very small amount of blame on the manager or the organization. They have bent over backwards for Sancho and he has spit in their face, not to mention simply not performed. He is not an expensive asset. He was. Stop living in the past. It was bad business once Sancho returned from his leave. We have to cut losses.I always back the manager in things like this. But in this case, guilt is 50:50 and owners/Ceo/Dof should have resolve this with them.
Sancho is very very exoensive asset and to give him away for 3 million is a bad business.