McGrathsipan
Dawn’s less famous husband
Is there any transfer news in this transfer thread?
He is right about one thing though, public criticism is seriously not okay, eapecially with these snowflake millenials.He gave him a carrot by letting him take a 3 month break to get his head straight. When the carrot constantly fails, you give the stick.
You genuinely might be the worst poster on the forum.
Hardly any of my posts have been given a reaction score, again, well done on the consistency of your posts.Ihave the same reaction score as you and you’ve had a head start of 8 years and 29,000 posts.
Maybe that’s because your primary contributions are regularly insulting posters who have different football opinions to you.
reactions are given to newbies until they get 10 at which point they’re promoted, that’s why you have nearly the same reaction score.Ihave the same reaction score as you and you’ve had a head start of 8 years and 29,000 posts.
Maybe that’s because your primary contributions are regularly insulting posters who have different football opinions to you.
Ok?
It’s all made up, isn’t it? The racial abuse, the friends and family dying, the having to deactivate from social media etc. etc.?
Ironic you say that I’m inventing things to suit my argument but you say: “he’s an unprofessional tit who thinks he’s above working hard”.
He is right about one thing though, public criticism is seriously not okay, eapecially with these snowflake millenials.
reactions are given to newbies until they get 10 at which point they’re promoted, that’s why you have nearly the same reaction score.
He is right about one thing though, public criticism is seriously not okay, eapecially with these snowflake millenials.
Hardly any of my posts have been given a reaction score, again, well done on the consistency of your posts.
reactions are given to newbies until they get 10 at which point they’re promoted, that’s why you have nearly the same reaction score.
Rashford and Garnacho have taken it fairly well in recent times. As long as the criticism isn't unfair or rude then there's no reason people can't respond well to it. It should also be noted that often the criticism isn't really directed at the ostensible target, sometimes it's about setting the standard for the squad / club and picking a target that you know can handle it. Evra said Fergie used to do it to him quite a lot.
Nobody gets likes once they’re promoted. That was my point. Jesus Christ, your whole claim was ridiculous.Exactly. You need to call a spade a spade. Even Jose has gone on the record and said he has had to adapt to “snowflake millenials”. It may not be something you like but it is the reality of the situation. Sancho’s generation is different.
So does that mean you contribute nowt to this forum beyond mocking posters due to a difference in football opinions
He’s got none since being promoted and he posts A LOT .
If that was me I wouldn’t go around mocking other posters for having a different opinion to me. Just saying.
I don’t remember SAF publicly calling out Uncle Pat. And he was not an angel either, remember when he took the French NT on strike when Anelka was booted out of the camp. Either way, not everyone responds the same to tough love or public criticism. It’s duty of the leader in any sort of organisation to make a judgement on how to reprimand or connect with someone who they feel is not meeting the standard or they want more out of.
In Sancho, ETH did not pick a target that could handle it. Sancho’s mental fragility following the racial abuse after the Euros is well publicised. I feel that many on here and among the wider fanbase generally do not understand how traumatising being a victim of racism can be. This is to be expected if you can’t relate but some empathy would be nice…
Exactly. You need to call a spade a spade. Even Jose has gone on the record and said he has had to adapt to “snowflake millenials”. It may not be something you like but it is the reality of the situation. Sancho’s generation is different.
So does that mean you contribute nowt to this forum beyond mocking posters due to a difference in football opinions
He’s got none since being promoted and he posts A LOT .
If that was me I wouldn’t go around mocking other posters for having a different opinion to me. Just saying.
I don’t remember SAF publicly calling out Uncle Pat. And he was not an angel either, remember when he took the French NT on strike when Anelka was booted out of the camp. Either way, not everyone responds the same to tough love or public criticism. It’s duty of the leader in any sort of organisation to make a judgement on how to reprimand or connect with someone who they feel is not meeting the standard or they want more out of.
In Sancho, ETH did not pick a target that could handle it. Sancho’s mental fragility following the racial abuse after the Euros is well publicised. I feel that many on here and among the wider fanbase generally do not understand how traumatising being a victim of racism can be. This is to be expected if you can’t relate but some empathy would be nice…
We still hand them out but mostly to shitposts and memes.Nobody gets likes once they’re promoted. That was my point. Jesus Christ, your whole claim was ridiculous.
What works for others can not work for some others. It's irrelevant what Fergie did 15 years ago and it's irrelevant how Rashford and Garnacho reacted what ETH did, people are very different and you are not a manager of people if you do not understand that you need to adapt and treat them differently.Rashford and Garnacho have taken it fairly well in recent times. As long as the criticism isn't unfair or rude then there's no reason people can't respond well to it. It should also be noted that often the criticism isn't really directed at the ostensible target, sometimes it's about setting the standard for the squad / club and picking a target that you know can handle it. Evra said Fergie used to do it to him quite a lot.
It has already been explained to you that reaction scores are for newbies. Once promoted they do not hold any significance.So does that mean you contribute nowt to this forum beyond mocking posters due to a difference in football opinions
He’s got none since being promoted and he posts A LOT .
If that was me I wouldn’t go around mocking other posters for having a different opinion to me. Just saying.
How many times? Ten Hag tried to pander to him. That didn't work. He then tried a bit of tough love and surprise surprise that didn't work either. The guy is a waste of space.He knew he had a guy with issues, and he did the most un-managerial gesture possible.
What works for others can not work for some others. It's irrelevant what Fergie did 15 years ago and it's irrelevant how Rashford and Garnacho reacted what ETH did, people are very different and you are not a manager of people if you do not understand that you need to adapt and treat them differently.
ETH knew he had a guy there with serious motivation(albeit you need to be a certain type of idiot not to be motivated to have the most beautiful job on the planet) and mental health struggles. Added to that, he also had a fairly known track record of not being a serious guy, turning up late to training, etc. Considering this, the only way in which you do that publicly if you want to get rid of him, end of story.
I managed people all my professional career, no fecking way you go to a news station and say "this guy doesn't work well", especially when you are his manager. I think people take the word "manager" very lightly these days.
He knew he had a guy with issues, and he did the most un-managerial gesture possible.
Do you think the club would be okay to say in their ETH sacking statement "This guy was not properly preparing the team"?
It is manager's job to be "a tit". Sir Alex was the best manager in history of the sport, and he has repeatedly removed world class players for less. Sancho hasn't done shit for us, let alone being world class and the petulant a-hole will rather sit on his ass than apologize.And it's not Sancho's fault the managers just as big of a tit.
We actually do know that ten hag tried very desparate things to get sancho in the right headspace without openly criticising him last year.Maybe he talked to Sancho numerous times, warned him, tried to help him... and it was hopeless. Ten Hag did play him a lot last year. I have no idea what happened behind the scenes, and neither do you.
What works for others can not work for some others. It's irrelevant what Fergie did 15 years ago and it's irrelevant how Rashford and Garnacho reacted what ETH did, people are very different and you are not a manager of people if you do not understand that you need to adapt and treat them differently.
ETH knew he had a guy there with serious motivation(albeit you need to be a certain type of idiot not to be motivated to have the most beautiful job on the planet) and mental health struggles. Added to that, he also had a fairly known track record of not being a serious guy, turning up late to training, etc. Considering this, the only way in which you do that publicly if you want to get rid of him, end of story.
I managed people all my professional career, no fecking way you go to a news station and say "this guy doesn't work well", especially when you are his manager. I think people take the word "manager" very lightly these days.
He knew he had a guy with issues, and he did the most un-managerial gesture possible.
Do you think the club would be okay to say in their ETH sacking statement "This guy was not properly preparing the team"?
Well the exception to picking a target that can handle it is when you don't give a shit if they can handle it or not because they're worthless anyway so you might as well find out what they're made of and send a message to the rest while you're there.
End of the day the lad got a 3 month paid break to go and work on whatever it was that was bothering him last season, came back and couldn't really be arsed. At what point are you allowed to stop wasting your energy on someone that doesn't want to play their part?
What works for others can not work for some others. It's irrelevant what Fergie did 15 years ago and it's irrelevant how Rashford and Garnacho reacted what ETH did, people are very different and you are not a manager of people if you do not understand that you need to adapt and treat them differently.
ETH knew he had a guy there with serious motivation(albeit you need to be a certain type of idiot not to be motivated to have the most beautiful job on the planet) and mental health struggles. Added to that, he also had a fairly known track record of not being a serious guy, turning up late to training, etc. Considering this, the only way in which you do that publicly if you want to get rid of him, end of story.
I managed people all my professional career, no fecking way you go to a news station and say "this guy doesn't work well", especially when you are his manager. I think people take the word "manager" very lightly these days.
He knew he had a guy with issues, and he did the most un-managerial gesture possible.
Do you think the club would be okay to say in their ETH sacking statement "This guy was not properly preparing the team"?
It has already been explained to you that reaction scores are for newbies. Once promoted they do not hold any significance.
Back to sancho, you have ignored that Ten hag consistently gave him the carrot last year before finally resorting to the stick. So your point doesn't hold.
I actually love thisI won’t respond to you until you delete your disrespectful posts and apologise. If you want a response from The Zol you have to reach a certain level every day.
Does your job have journalists who are paid to ask you about your team every week who notice when they go missing? And have you never wanted to get rid of anyone in your team? Never told anyone off to make a point to the others?
If you want a response from The Zol you have to reach a certain level every day.
I won’t respond to you until you delete your disrespectful posts and apologise. If you want a response from The Zol you have to reach a certain level every day.
What works for others can not work for some others. It's irrelevant what Fergie did 15 years ago and it's irrelevant how Rashford and Garnacho reacted what ETH did, people are very different and you are not a manager of people if you do not understand that you need to adapt and treat them differently.
ETH knew he had a guy there with serious motivation(albeit you need to be a certain type of idiot not to be motivated to have the most beautiful job on the planet) and mental health struggles. Added to that, he also had a fairly known track record of not being a serious guy, turning up late to training, etc. Considering this, the only way in which you do that publicly if you want to get rid of him, end of story.
I managed people all my professional career, no fecking way you go to a news station and say "this guy doesn't work well", especially when you are his manager. I think people take the word "manager" very lightly these days.
He knew he had a guy with issues, and he did the most un-managerial gesture possible.
Do you think the club would be okay to say in their ETH sacking statement "This guy was not properly preparing the team"?
He is right about one thing though, public criticism is seriously not okay, eapecially with these snowflake millenials.
He should have been called Zod!Post of the year contender here. What the actual feck
I won’t respond to you until you delete your disrespectful posts and apologise. If you want a response from The Zol you have to reach a certain level every day.
I'm sure coaches are more than capable to give non-answers to just about any question and I find it hard to come up with a scenario where burning bridges via the public is good man management.
Fair points.As I just posted in another thread, his contract is obscene. He won’t leave for a pay cut, and because you so massively overpaid to attract him to the club you’re stuck with a very expensive player on a long contract.
Quite simply, clubs which would like him or where I could picture him going (mid to high tier clubs like Juventus, BvB, Atletico, maybe Villa/Spurs) can’t afford him.
He is on over £13m a year salary plus bonuses until 2027. A club would then also have to pay a transfer fee to Manchester United, a huge agent fee (notorious agent Emeka Obasi), signing on fee…
In short, the only clubs who could afford to take him on a permanent move don’t need him. The clubs that would want him can’t afford him.
I strongly suspect a loan next month back to Germany - if Ten Hag stays.
No @THE ZOL got them for his excellent postings.reactions are given to newbies until they get 10 at which point they’re promoted, that’s why you have nearly the same reaction score.
Keep going!So does that mean you contribute nowt to this forum beyond mocking posters due to a difference in football opinions
He’s got none since being promoted and he posts A LOT .
If that was me I wouldn’t go around mocking other posters for having a different opinion to me. Just saying.
100% this forum doesn’t deserve you.I won’t respond to you until you delete your disrespectful posts and apologise. If you want a response from The Zol you have to reach a certain level every day.
For any normal player that wouldn't have been burning bridges though. It was actually calm and respectful unlike what somebody like Mourinho would say about some of our players. I'm all for nobody wasting too much mental energy on Sancho personally, it's nobody's fault but the United board's if they've given a 21 year old a contract big enough that he fancied semi-retirement off the back of it.
Dortmund might not be able to afford "£70m" to make a point but we didn't have much choice other than to take a massive loss off Sancho anyway so what's £20m or whatever really? If anything I think selling him for too low a fee would make our FFP calculations worse weirdly.
It is the sort of thing that could benefit the club in the long term if the people in charge of the football side are all signing off the hymn sheet. Remains to be seen though.I don't think you mention something negative about people at the club to the press at all unless it's a deliberate decision. Was Sancho's reaction (overly) sensitive and unprofessional? Probably. Was an unprofessional reaction foreseeable? Probably. Did any of this benefit the club? Probably not. Was is it therefore a good decision? Probably not.
I don't think you mention something negative about people at the club to the press at all unless it's a deliberate decision. Was Sancho's reaction (overly) sensitive and unprofessional? Probably. Was an unprofessional reaction foreseeable? Probably. Did any of this benefit the club? Probably not. Was is it therefore a good decision? Probably not.
Rosmalen is beautiful this time of year.Am I worthy of posting in this thread? Feeling intimidated by all the high power posters that seem to be present of late.
Maybe I need a month in the Netherlands to get my head round it all
I won’t respond to you until you delete your disrespectful posts and apologise. If you want a response from The Zol you have to reach a certain level every day.