Jadon Sancho - Chelsea (loan) watch

He’s in for a rude awakening when he gets back to Carrington and realises they don’t do those free little lunchboxes anymore.
 
Horrible news if true, but probably more realistic than Chelsea committing themselves at such an easy to reach target, even allowing for the relative low transfer fee commitment.
 
Great player that was used wrong and bullied out by EtH.

True story

Interesting


Not a good look for Ten Hag or the club is it? I'm just glad he can't play against us this season.

He has two really, won the penalty with a move he created.

Fecking idiotic to send him to a rival in hindsight. There was no reward, it's all risk.

Shows that we as fans know nothing about a players personality, glad he is doing well.

“he’ll revert to type” kills me because he was one of the most productive wingers in Europe before United. So maybe the type is him creating goals and United was the anomaly?

Good to see him doing well, I’m always happy to see players get their careers back on track

His form at Dortmund and Chelsea only supports the decision to get rid of ETH. Sancho was a dick the way he behaved at United but clearly a talented player. ETH strangles wingers too much and robs them of expression. Painful seeing Sancho assisting whilst our wingers create little.

ETH fecked up.

Looking like the player we signed. Is it correct he will go for £25 million. Absolutely shocking business.




We live in the worst timeline truly


Yup. We break players.

Would Sancho be Chelsea's missing piece that take them to greater heights? The Cantona's that was sold cheap because his manager didn't like him?

I’m tempted to create a Let’s laugh at RedCafe thread. We wanted Sancho go so badly. 3 assists…

If we had done the right thing and sacked ETH before the final, Sancho would still be our player

little flavour of some of the early days carnage when he arsed an assist or two. Not sure this forum will ever learn, but hes now nearly 30 games in and is absolutely awful and rumours are beginning that chelsea are prepared to pay to not take him. It was bad here, but even worse broadly online and in the media desperation to create a comeback narrative, the same as we see with rashford.
 
little flavour of some of the early days carnage when he arsed an assist or two. Not sure this forum will ever learn, but hes now nearly 30 games in and is absolutely awful and rumours are beginning that chelsea are prepared to pay to not take him. It was bad here, but even worse broadly online and in the media desperation to create a comeback narrative, the same as we see with rashford.
2 things can be true. ETH fecked up and Sancho is a little bitch
 
2 things can be true. ETH fecked up and Sancho is a little bitch

honestly im not getting into a back and forth at all on any notion that ten hag did anything but right be getting this slob out of the team and club. Maybe im close minded, but i have absolutely no interest in hearing another argument on it at this point (keeping in mind he was handled with soft gloves and compassionate leave in season 1.)

Its human nature to move goalposts and not admit being wrong. Anybody who thought letting him go was a mistake was wrong. Plain and simple.
 
honestly im not getting into a back and forth at all on any notion that ten hag did anything but right be getting this slob out of the team and club. Maybe im close minded, but i have absolutely no interest in hearing another argument on it at this point (keeping in mind he was handled with soft gloves and compassionate leave in season 1.)
Then why did you tag all of us if you have no interest in discussing :lol: You're a funny one
 
Then why did you tag all of us if you have no interest in discussing :lol: You're a funny one

sharing a collection of posts isnt neccesarily an invitation to engage in one on ones with 15+ posters. who has that time? multiple posts shared together effectively illustrate the point im making about overreacting to his early form, as is happenign with rashford. I don't owe any further engagement and Im sorry if you need it
 
sharing a collection of posts isnt neccesarily an invitation to engage in one on ones with 15+ posters. who has that time? multiple posts shared together effectively illustrate the point im making about overreacting to his early form, as is happenign with rashford. I don't owe any further engagement and Im sorry if you need it
It kinda is, you can't tag someone and not expect some form of response by any of the 15 people you tagged. That's crazy
 
It kinda is, you can't tag someone and not expect some form of response by any of the 15 people you tagged. That's crazy

people can respond all they like. have at it, but theres no obligation to get in a back and forth on my part. the quotes illustrate the only point im making here. I also didnt 'tag' anyone, the quote function does that automatically.
 
I think it’s legit because Laurie Whitwell hinted at the same thing recently.
Is it something they are seriously considering though? From what I gather he's not been a complete disaster so it would be a bit odd to pay to get themselves out of it.

I suspect it's just a story as a theoretical option rather something they are looking to do.
 
You'd think so, otherwise the obligation is useless. Perhaps they prefer to write off the 25m if it means not committing to that fee plus his huge wage.

It's not, theoretically United could pocket £10m as a penalty from Chelsea and then sell him elsewhere for £25m and get more money out of the deal overall.

Of course the issue in reality is finding anybody who'll be willing to buy him.
 
I didn't think Sancho was shit at United, as someone who never rated him at Dortmund - I felt he was okay but nothing special for his price or wage. Very inconsistent.

I'd still be excited to see him under Amorim if the manager can get some blood pumping in to Sancho again.

Amad and Sancho as attacking midfielders would give us balance even if its not that great.
Please put the drink down, you've obviously had way too much.
 
The debate really is if we should subsidize his salary for him to go play somewhere else or have him around as a rotation option. We'll potentially save 6-7m by flogging him on loan. He showed enough flashes of quality at both Chelsea and BVB that I think there's at least a rotation caliber player in there and he'd probably do better than Eriksen in that #10 role.

If you're opposed to this as a matter of principle because he insulted the club and don't want him back, then that's fair (I'm sort of in this camp). But otherwise I'd rather have Sancho around than an extra 6m in the bank account.
So the whole culture reset is off then. Let's get Rashford back in and his mate Jesse while we're at it. Oh and Pogba isn't busy at the moment either. Sounds like a promising team that! :rolleyes:
 
This is what is going to happen. He has been doing okay for Chelsea and will probably be able to offload him for a profit this season or the next. I really don't think there is anything to them not singing him at such a low fee.
Why would he go to Saudi? He'd have to agree to go, they can't just sell him because they want to make a quick and easy profit. He's not a packet of crisps.

He's already shown he's willing to not play.
 
Oh dear, that doesn’t sound good if they can opt out.

Think it’s more likely he takes a reduced salary and signs for them but who knows.

There won’t be many takers for him if he does come back. Could be the biggest turn around in fortunes ever though…..
Dortmund, somewhere in Germany
 
You’d hope any cancellation fee would be 15-20m otherwise it’s not much of an obligation. Hopefully the deal still goes through but his wages are clearly going to be an issue.

He won’t play for us again I’ve no doubt, if Chelsea back out he’ll be out on loan or sold on the cheap.
 
We can't have one day of positive, forward thinking news, without some fecker coming along to stick a pin in it.

Whether or not you're a fan of the new stadium design, or a new build at all, I'm sure everyone can agree that after years of neglect, just seeing the club announce something positive, ambitious and forward thinking makes for a relatively good day.

But no, then this news has to come snaking in, like a turd that won't flush.
Had to check what thread this was a minute :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
If this is true, I hope we did what Chelsea did with Lukaku in making him having agreed to lowering his contract before going out on loan. Therefore, even if he comes back, we'll have a loan fee but have a player on lower wages easier to ship out in the summer.

Maybe Dortmund can finally afford the fecker.
 
I always thought this was Chelsea basically flipping a rundown house. They are scammers and will undoubtedly be able to flip Sancho for a 5m or so profit
 
But I thought the problem was our toxic environment and not poor old Sancho’s work ethic. Hahaha.
 
Well, we're broke, so if Chelsea returning him means we get significant penalties paid to us, at least that's something.
We were getting £25 million , there’s no club going to pay that for him so we are down a lot of money if they do pay the penalty
 
Can't believe there are actually people here who would want him back. Mind boggling.
 
Tragic little situation for him really, and both clubs. All the shite, and Chelsea willing to pay to give him back. Sums up what a disappointment of a player he is.
 
Is it something they are seriously considering though? From what I gather he's not been a complete disaster so it would be a bit odd to pay to get themselves out of it.

I suspect it's just a story as a theoretical option rather something they are looking to do.

Laurie did not mention or indicate anything about Chelsea's intentions - just the existence of the "break" clause.

However, as news is coming out about the break clause now, I do think there must be some discussion around its use. Either Chelsea want Sancho to accept a lower wage and he is being difficult or Chelsea are not convinced by him and want to send him back.
 
We were getting £25 million , there’s no club going to pay that for him so we are down a lot of money if they do pay the penalty
Not necessarily I mean if the penalty is 10million then we only need to sell him for 15 to get the same amount. I could honestly see some Italian team taking a chance at him for a loan plus obligated fee if that fee was around 15-20 million
 
Far from ideal, those 25 million + taking his wages off the books would be really nice business (and we all counted on it). I doubt penalty fee is more than 10-12 million, which would leave us to find someone who is willing to pay pretty much the same transfer fee or the worse case scenario send him on another loan with us paying some of his wages. Not ideal in any case and Sancho won't lower his wage demands that's for sure.

If this happens, we really need to find someone willing to pay 15 million transfer fee. If our financial situation isn't so fecked up this would be absolutely hilarious though.
 
Last edited:
Chelsea will have assumed he’d at least maintain a base level value that given his age would keep him attractive to clubs at Dortmunds tier. So that they could easily sell him on for a small profit.

A full season there and it’s obvious to all the only place he’ll be in 2026 is either stinking up Chelsea’s bench, in the MLS or Kleague like Lingard. He’s not getting any more interest from Europe for £25m, and I doubt even Saudi would bother with him.
 
If he comes back next season and we've won the Europa league, we'll then be in the champions league and I bet his contract has a wage increase in it for us having champions league football.
 
Sancho could become the first football player in the history to have one club pay another club to NOT buy him!
 
I didn't think Sancho was shit at United, as someone who never rated him at Dortmund - I felt he was okay but nothing special for his price or wage. Very inconsistent.

I'd still be excited to see him under Amorim if the manager can get some blood pumping in to Sancho again.

Amad and Sancho as attacking midfielders would give us balance even if its not that great.
He’s less motivated than Rashford and we all know how that turned out.