Obligation. He is a Chelsea player
Chelsea need to come 14th or higher for it to be an obligation I thought. Or actually that just affects the fee maybe?Obligation. He is a Chelsea player
The thing is performances like today has been quite common with him. If he was still at United, media and rival fans would be mocking him. He should do a decent job at a club like Milan where pressure is not this much and he can live on one good performance from five games.In fairness, performing as an away player at Anfield should hardly be used as the benchmark.
It was when Sancho didn't look any sort of game changer against anyone at home, our tier or not.
The thing is performances like today has been quite common with him. If he was still at United, media and rival fans would be mocking him. He should do a decent job at a club like Milan where pressure is not this much and he can live on one good performance from five games.
Was definitely poor overall but thought it was a mistake to use Gusto as his partner out wide on the left. They had no chemistry whatsoever; it badly hampered us attacking down that side.
Also if the Jones contact was a penalty I don't properly understand why Trent taking out Sancho's standing leg wasn't?
Oh I agree. I don't have an issue with playing Gusto at left back, I just would have used Mudryk or Neto on the left instead of Sancho since both are more comfortable staying wide while Gusto occupied the left half spaceVeiga isn’t much better in terms of supporting him, making over/under lapping runs etc. Cucurella is brilliant at it. But yeah, this was a shite game from Sancho and deservedly hooked at HT. I actually with the way we constantly managed to get him 1v1 vs Trent, Mudryk would have been a nice option off the bench.
Neto showed him up when he came on, much more direct running threat. As others have said, he’s not a winger, more an attacking midfielder’s skillset
I obviously don’t watch as much Chelsea as you, it seems inconceivable that he could change a game. Who do you think should start?Vs Bournemouth it was opposite. Neto was terrible, hooked at HT and Sancho came on and made a big difference. That LW spot is up for grabs. I don’t think either of them are clear of Mudryk either .
Depends entirely on the opposition and how we are set up. If Sancho is on the wing with runners around him and/or when we have consistent possession around the opposition penalty area he's genuinely dangerous and the best option. If our left winger is going to be more isolated in a stretched game he's not ideal.I obviously don’t watch as much Chelsea as you, it seems inconceivable that he could change a game. Who do you think should start?
When he’s arsed, I think he’s a good player
Knowing Chelsea, they’ll probably sign him for £25m as per the obligation, then sell him the following week for £40m and buy the latest new toy.If Chelsea end up being forced to sign him, can they sell him in the same window?
When is he ever arsed, though?When he’s arsed, I think he’s a good player
Im seeing some Chelsea fans online beginning to see what we’ve seen for a few years. His “assists” has just blurred their vision recently. Today was par Sancho.Hmm, thread not bumped after a truly diabolical half, where hes been hooked off. Timid and dreadful.
I suppose people only race to post here when he shins an assist.
That has to genuinely be Ineos’ best bit of business so far at Utd. The fact they were able to get a club to agree to an obligation to buy Sancho. It really is genius. I honestly thought we were doomed for the remainder of his contract.He’s so shit. Can’t believe Chelsea made it an obligation to buy. Waste of space.
I obviously don’t watch as much Chelsea as you, it seems inconceivable that he could change a game. Who do you think should start?
