Sancho does not operate like Bruno. I really don't understand the logic of Sancho at £90m when there are bigger priorities. Haaland or Kane make more sense but will be setting their sights higher.I expect we would regularly rotate between our main three options - Rashford, Greenwood and Sancho.
--------------------Cavani*----------------
--Rashford-----Bruno-----Sancho--
--------------------Cavani*----------------
--Sancho-----Bruno-----Greenwood--
--------------------Cavani*----------------
--Rashford-----Bruno-----Greenwood--
*If Martial gets back into form he will also regularly play as striker again.
It gives us great options to cover for both injuries or poor form, plus just general rotation so nobody plays too much and burns out or has to play through injuries (looking at Rashford in particular). Throw in Pogba, Martial and Amad also hopefully being quality options and we should be set going forward, although obviously there are question marks over each of those three atm. We can also occasionally play all three, with either Greenwood or Rashford playing up front or Sancho may end up being our best back-up for Bruno.
Varane at 35, Trippier at 10 and Grealish at 80 makes £125m gross. Sell a few players and there's no reason we couldn't spend another £30-35m on a midfielder. Personally I'd love to see us go for Locatelli.
The elephant in the room is whether Sancho is good value even at £90m when there are areas of the team we need strengthening which are a bigger priority - central defence, box to box creative midfield, striker. Sancho would operate in a position where Greenwood is excelling.
Sancho can play on the left but that is Rashford's domain.
So how does he fit? And this is a similar question that has been raised with our transfer dealings before.
I ask myself will that £90m make us significantly (in other words £90m) better than we currently are and would it be money well spent and i fear the answer is 'no'.
But open to persuasion.
Yeah I think Greenwood is a great player and has enormous talent. But he’s not a great right winger. He does the job and does it well because he’s such a good player though. His long term future should be as a striker.The thing is towards the end of the season Greenwood was playing well and scoring goals but he's not excelling at RW. We have no width when he or Rashford play there and AWB is often isolated when we switch the play over to him.
We attack down our left side most of the time which makes things easier for the opposition and makes us more predicable and thus it's harder to for us to break down defences.
except it's Sancho at 80m, Trippier at 20m and Varane/any other CB at between 50-65m
I agree. We are two left sided but that is more because Wan Bissaka is like a rabbit in the headlights going forward on the right while Shaw actually offers something on the left.The thing is towards the end of the season Greenwood was playing well and scoring goals but he's not excelling at RW. We have no width when he or Rashford play there and AWB is often isolated when we switch the play over to him.
We attack down our left side most of the time which makes things easier for the opposition and makes us more predicable and thus it's harder to for us to break down defences.
except it's Sancho at 80m, Trippier at 20m and Varane/any other CB at between 50-65m
I heard lots of talk of this killer instinct but it hasnt really been revealed in any consistent basis. He certainly doesnt take Cavani' s place. And looks more comfortable on the right side of the attack. We definitely need to see more from him but he is still very young.Greenwood has killer instinct he needs to be in front of goal. Hopefully Sancho can add quality to our wide play.
Ronaldo did OK playing the peak of his career as a LWF. The game has changed, modern forwards find their space coming from wide positions rather than leading the line.Greenwood has killer instinct he needs to be in front of goal. Hopefully Sancho can add quality to our wide play.
I agree. We are two left sided but that is more because Wan Bissaka is like a rabbit in the headlights going forward on the right while Shaw actually offers something on the left.
Wan-Bissaka's one killer trick is tackling. But it isnt enough and the idea he could play central defence is mind boggling. He just hasnt the positional sense to play there right now.
It was the same shit last year. Even though Greenwood is good there, we have literally no one else. Amad hasn’t shown much to be a consistent starter, James is shocking on the right. Rashford is shocking on the right. Mata is done. But it’s not a priority, just keep the black hole there and continue to avoid building up through the right.I can't believe it's 2021, we've had no RW for near on a decade and people still don't think its a priority.
That will happen on Day 1 when he starts on the leftHow long do we think it will be before we’re all complaining that we are playing him on the left, moaning that Rashford isn’t playing well enough on the right and it should be Greenwood starting on the right if Sancho is playing his best football from the left?
I heard lots of talk of this killer instinct but it hasnt really been revealed in any consistent basis. He certainly doesnt take Cavani' s place. And looks more comfortable on the right side of the attack. We definitely need to see more from him but he is still very young.
I hope for a CM as well but we're hardly linked with any and Sancho + Trippier + a CB is already going to be around £150m net spend
I just hope a competent CB partner for Maguire means a more adventurous midfield
The elephant in the room is whether Sancho is good value even at £90m when there are areas of the team we need strengthening which are a bigger priority - central defence, box to box creative midfield, striker. Sancho would operate in a position where Greenwood is excelling.
Sancho can play on the left but that is Rashford's domain.
So how does he fit? And this is a similar question that has been raised with our transfer dealings before.
I ask myself will that £90m make us significantly (in other words £90m) better than we currently are and would it be money well spent and i fear the answer is 'no'.
But open to persuasion.
Locatelli would be a great signing for us and one that you’d think shouldn’t cost to much. I’d like Varane and trippier but would prefer sancho to grealish just because I think he’s more versatile and can play across the front 3, id sign grealish if we sell pogba.Varane at 35, Trippier at 10 and Grealish at 80 makes £125m gross. Sell a few players and there's no reason we couldn't spend another £30-35m on a midfielder. Personally I'd love to see us go for Locatelli.
He aint that good imo. Still very inconsistent and very often invisible during matches. He has good stats, but so had Kagawa and Mkhitarjan. Players that fits into Dortmunds system tend to not fit into ours. Grealish would be a much better fit imo.
This. You can't develop as a striker if you don't play as a striker. I can really see ole wanting to bring in a right winger so that he is able to play greenwood up top more. Him rotating with Cavani next year would be good to see how he develops.He’s not been given a run in the team in role on consistent basis though. And supply from wide has been pretty awful, again something Sancho will hopefully improve
The elephant in the room is whether Sancho is good value even at £90m
Sancho would operate in a position where Greenwood is excelling
Sancho can play on the left but that is Rashford's domain
We've beaten some of the best teams in Europe with McFred starting. Quality across Europe isn't great right now.
You’ve missed the Phil Jones as spearhead option tooSpot on. Also, (and I keep repeating this on here) - it's been reported that Rashford is still carrying a shoulder injury and may need surgery after the Euros. He could miss part of next season - so it's good that Sancho can play well on the left.
Imagine our front three options next season:
Sancho - Cavani - Rashford
Greenwood - Cavani - Sancho
Sancho - Greenwood - Rashford
Greenwood - Cavani - Rashford
EDIT: I've just realised I've not even considered Martial - there's even more options!
In terms of fit, he is the ideal signing. A front 3 with all 3 of them shooters/scorers just doesn't work and isn't balanced even if you think Greenwoods long term future is on the right wing. You need one of the wingers to be a creator. Sancho is a creator. Have him on one of the wings opposite to Rashford or Greenwood, and now you have both the top class quality and depth to rotate however you want between these players where we'll have excellent balance in the attack. Sancho creating on the right will help out Rashford on the left, and Greenwood on the right if Sancho is on the left. Greenwood isn't good enough as a right winger to make that position his own yet, and our right wing has been a constant problem this season as we've been so heavily reliant on the left wing for all build up play, so Sancho would finally give us that right wing balance for most games anyway.The elephant in the room is whether Sancho is good value even at £90m when there are areas of the team we need strengthening which are a bigger priority - central defence, box to box creative midfield, striker. Sancho would operate in a position where Greenwood is excelling.
Sancho can play on the left but that is Rashford's domain.
So how does he fit? And this is a similar question that has been raised with our transfer dealings before.
I ask myself will that £90m make us significantly (in other words £90m) better than we currently are and would it be money well spent and i fear the answer is 'no'.
But open to persuasion.
I think we’d still be a top right back, top DM and top CF away really, although Chelsea and City have proven this season that you can win the top honours without a prolific striker. Still think we’d be too porous to go far in Europe either way, and too one dimensional without an attacking threat down the right. Sancho and Trippier instead of Sancho and AWB might change all that though.Sancho and Varane and I think we're in with a chance winning Champions League next season.
The holding midfielder for sure would be needed. Trippier is more for rotation and competition for Wan Bissaka that would help far more in the league than in the CL, where it's 1 or 2 big games per round IMO. Unfortunately there is no 1 signing solution to get us there, but the quickest and closest thing would without a doubt in my mind be getting Sancho in attack for his creativity, versatility and overall class of player, and then someone like Rice to be the defensive midfielder as we don't have one now and it'd make a world of difference. We can live without a CB and go far, and Lindelof/Tuanzebe/Bailly would look far better behind Rice than they currently do (just look at Stones looking competent behind Fernandinho).I think we’d still be a top right back, top DM and top CF away really, although Chelsea and City have proven this season that you can win the top honours without a prolific striker. Still think we’d be too porous to go far in Europe either way, and too one dimensional without an attacking threat down the right. Sancho and Trippier instead of Sancho and AWB might change all that though.
Even with any doubts I have over Sancho's best position, the need to sign him should be pretty obvious after a season in which our manager felt it necessary to run Rashford into the ground, where we looked light in attack when Greenwood wasn't playing well in the first half of the season and particularly after a final in which the manager was clearly reluctant to swap any of his starting players out of the team.
I expect we would regularly rotate between our main three options - Rashford, Greenwood and Sancho.
--------------------Cavani*----------------
--Rashford-----Bruno-----Sancho--
--------------------Cavani*----------------
--Sancho-----Bruno-----Greenwood--
--------------------Cavani*----------------
--Rashford-----Bruno-----Greenwood--
*If Martial gets back into form he will also regularly play as striker again.
It gives us great options to cover for both injuries or poor form, plus just general rotation so nobody plays too much and burns out or has to play through injuries (looking at Rashford in particular). Throw in Pogba, Martial and Amad also hopefully being quality options and we should be set going forward, although obviously there are question marks over each of those three atm. We can also occasionally play all three, with either Greenwood or Rashford playing up front or Sancho may end up being our best back-up for Bruno.
We couldn't break them down because we tried to play it safe with our substitution to get to penalty shootout, to be honest. We didn't try to up the tempo and break their defence down enough. It's more an issue with our approach that game rather than our personnel.Breaking teams down has been our biggest issue for 2 years now. Why do people keep forgetting that? Hell, our last game was us losing a final because we couldn’t break Villarreal down and get a second goal.
I can't believe it's 2021, we've had no RW for near on a decade and people still don't think its a priority.
Why would he? The difference for Sancho playing on the left or right is quite small, compared to Rashford who tends to be far better on the left (although he has had some good matches on the right in the past). They'd certainly rotate a fair bit throughout the match but I don't see why we'd mostly play Rashford on the right in that situation.Sign Sancho and I will not be surprised if Ole sticks him on the left and continues to keep playing Rashford on the right.
One action doesn’t automatically transpire that the other will happenSign Sancho and I will not be surprised if Ole sticks him on the left and continues to keep playing Rashford on the right.
Sign Sancho and I will not be surprised if Ole sticks him on the left and continues to keep playing Rashford on the right.
I can't believe it's 2021, we've had no RW for near on a decade and people still don't think its a priority.
last season, yes. In 18/19 and 19/20 he played more on the right.Problem is that Sancho regularly plays on the LW for Dortmund.