I_live_cement
Cat freak
Interesting. Always thought it was Leo Tolstoy-- Was surprised to check out his real name..
Leo is still closer to the actual pronunciation though.
In English it should really be written 'Lyov'.
Interesting. Always thought it was Leo Tolstoy-- Was surprised to check out his real name..
No, the fans are to blame. If you stop standing up for certain values, principles and you glorify managers such as Mourinho in his current guise (peak Jose is a different story) then when the club is in its current predicament, and you're still oblivious to the causes and what are the right actions to take, then yes.. the fans are also complicit. They get what they deserve.
Thought that this was worth bumping up. This piece was savaged when it was written but has IMHO aged very well.
A bit over dramatic but at least he saw what's wrong and tried to do something about it. Evolution happened because of people like him. Sheep like us can help a little if he manages to convince us to bother. In my case, I have to say, he won't. Sorry, Jesus has tried.It was savaged primarily because it was a grandiose, dramatic way to say "I'm fed up and I want to do something about it". Everyone felt that way. People were fed up with different things and thought about different solutions, but everyone was fed up. Most people didn't need to announce it at all, and almost no-one felt compelled to do it so dramatically. The reason for that is pretty obvious, hence the title.
What people decide to do about it is their call, but moralising about it is ridiculous. We're talking about football here. It's a game, and individual fans are an irrelevant part of it. Thinking your lone decision as a fan / customer can influence an organisation that isn't even aware of your existence is silly. Doing so about a game is childish. Wrapping it up in a novela with Nazi references is surreal.
It was savaged primarily because it was a grandiose, dramatic way to say "I'm fed up and I want to do something about it". Everyone felt that way. People were fed up with different things and thought about different solutions, but everyone was fed up. Most people didn't need to announce it at all, and almost no-one felt compelled to do it so dramatically. The reason for that is pretty obvious, hence the title.
What people decide to do about it is their call, but moralising about it is ridiculous. We're talking about football here. It's a game, and individual fans are an irrelevant part of it. Thinking your lone decision as a fan / customer can influence an organisation that isn't even aware of your existence is silly. Doing so about a game is childish. Wrapping it up in a novela with Nazi references is surreal.
It was savaged primarily because it was a grandiose, dramatic way to say "I'm fed up and I want to do something about it". Everyone felt that way. People were fed up with different things and thought about different solutions, but everyone was fed up. Most people didn't need to announce it at all, and almost no-one felt compelled to do it so dramatically. The reason for that is pretty obvious, hence the title.
What people decide to do about it is their call, but moralising about it is ridiculous. We're talking about football here. It's a game, and individual fans are an irrelevant part of it. Thinking your lone decision as a fan / customer can influence an organisation that isn't even aware of your existence is silly. Doing so about a game is childish. Wrapping it up in a novela with Nazi references is surreal.
An individual fan can’t do anything on his own but can convince others to do something about a situation which can have a domino effect and lead to a wider movement to make something happen. Don’t think that happened in this instance as it led to most of the forum backing the manager even more but in principle groups of fans can definitely have a big impact on the running of their clubs especially the match going contingent. One of the reasons Jose was able to stay so long was because of the influence of that match going contingent - he still had their support and they do factor in to whether or not it is the right time to let go of a manager - imagine Woodward going to a game with a very hostile Old Trafford? It would be an incredibly uncomfortable experience and would force the boards hands.
As for the Nazi references - apart from the line using right and left wing as an analogy there is no explicit reference to nazism at all - I changed the title almost immediately as I realised it was in bad taste as a pun but other than that the only continued reference to politics is the current republican movement and that’s absolutely a fair criticism as much of the media commented on the similarities between Trump and Jose - difference here was it also needed to be pointed out that our fans were behaving like Trump supporters too and in light of recent events have been made to look like fools for their unerring support of him and wanting rid of guys like Martial.
Final point - football is indeed just a game - to the players. To the fans it is a mere form of entertainment if we want to put it in blunt terms. Therefore we are basically just a consumer and therefore we do have rights to complain if the entertainment is not forthcoming and it’s causing us misery.
We all remember the 'even if lvg never wins a trophy he has been a success' thread.
The replies, in the majority, mocked the "extravagance and pretension". I'm not sure that his position that Mourinho played right wing football and is Donald Trump has particularly been vindicated...although given you didn't read the post you may simply think it was a standard "this is going horribly wrong with Mourinho" point made at unusually great length.I guess the intention was correct. Unnecessarily and gloriously extravagant nonetheless with huge amount of pretension. But some of the mocking responses still oblivious to the situation probably deserves the bump. Never ofcourse read it past the title but that’s just me.