I rewatched it, and A Night To Remember.
Now look here, the wraparound story of the grave robbers, with the Pat Cash douchebag as cipher for douchebag James Cameron is fecking dreadful. The acting is bad, it's long, it's boring, it's nerdy indulgence, and I really don't need 40 minutes of Cameron doing his tedious hobby. Cut this to a 5 minute intro, or better yet cut it altogether and we're cool. Then:
Titanic is just about a great film. Silly? yes, ludicrous characters and love story plotting? sure, subtle? no. However Winslet is dynamite, DiCaprio is perfect, it has a great ensemble cast. The Jack and Rose relationship is a pound land Edith Wharton and a ridiculous cheesy hook, but it's sweet and their chemistry is good.
I would put Titanic up there with the best disaster movies like Poseidon and Towering Inferno. It's exciting and genuinely panic inducing. The way the water creeps round doors, the pacing of the action, the way madness rises as the ship sinks further is all masterfully captured. It's horrible and thrilling. The effects are stunning and really hold up, as they usually do with Cameron. They look and feel real, they are carefully crafted and have weight. It succeeds where a lot of modern expensive action films look like shit. I can't think of any action blockbuster of recent, that can favourably compare.
I honestly can't see why the critics were so sneery. It's broad and bold and is not trying to hoodwink anyone. There is the ineffectual class commentary and depictions in steerage that might be offensive if they were not so laughable. But we know these are Hollywood brush strokes. I like that teenage girls seemed to take it under their wing.
A Night to Remember is subtler, similarly spectacular and provides the template, it's an unqualified great film. Titanic honours it well.