Gehrman
Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 11,912
Pep might well retire as the most succesfull manager of all time but for me that doesn't automatically translate to the best or greatest.
If you choose to ignore the FFP cheating then Pep has done a great job but I think he's had it easier than Sir Alex. City were already winning titles under Mancini and Pellegrini before Pep took over so the team was already in a much better place compared to when Sir Alex took over United.For me Pep is the best, city are incredible we have to admit that. Never have I seen a united team this good. 99 was brilliant but if Pep does this it eclipses what we achieved.
Financial doping and using that as a claim that they are cheats makes me cringe. It's not even been proven yet. Everyone now spends a shed load of money, we have also just very very badly. You have to spend money to buy good players to win leagues.
I've no problem with rich people injecting money into the beautiful game in England, obviously within the rules.
Bottom line, you can accuse people of whatever you want. If they are not convicted and punished then posterity still counts all those titles as belonging to whoever won them. Those are the hard facts. That's why I keep it to the pitch in assessing who is better than who. You're of course free to choose your own criteria.1- time barred
2- current charges are under investigation both in Spain and England
3- Juve has been punished for false accounting, the "plusvalenza". One case involves a deal with Barcelona (who did the same false accounting, and also did it in other deals with Valencia). Juve were punished by Italian authorities. Barcelona are no even under investigation for these.
Why? You tell me.
Bottom line, you can accuse people of whatever you want. If they are not convicted and punished then posterity still counts all those titles as belonging to whoever won them. Those are the hard facts. That's why I keep it to the pitch in assessing who is better than who. You're of course free to choose your own criteria.
Take the Barca case for example. The argument is not whether money was paid to that guy, however dodgy that looks. What you have to prove (and what is alleged) is a direct link between money paid and influence on referees in favour of Barcelona in football matches.
If you have enough money you can pretty much get away with anything, regardless of whether or not you actually committed a crime. That's not something that should be used as a defence though, especially in a sport where money usually dictates who wins these days.Bottom line, you can accuse people of whatever you want. If they are not convicted and punished then posterity still counts all those titles as belonging to whoever won them. Those are the hard facts. That's why I keep it to the pitch in assessing who is better than who. You're of course free to choose your own criteria.
For me Pep is the best, city are incredible we have to admit that. Never have I seen a united team this good. 99 was brilliant but if Pep does this it eclipses what we achieved.
Financial doping and using that as a claim that they are cheats makes me cringe. It's not even been proven yet. Everyone now spends a shed load of money, we have also just very very badly. You have to spend money to buy good players to win leagues.
I've no problem with rich people injecting money into the beautiful game in England, obviously within the rules.
City have obviously cheated their way to their position. They have spent way beyond their natural means - it isn’t even arguable.
Why should it be acceptable that one team breaks the rules that the other 19 teams abide by? And so blatantly that it results in so many charges!
I'm not confusing anything with anything. The Maradona example is a terrible one because millions of people literally saw it happen. We are talking about things that are alleged but not established or proven by tribunals or similar legal or administrative bodies. Take the Barca case for example. The argument is not whether money was paid to that guy, however dodgy that looks. What you have to prove (and what is alleged) is a direct link between money paid and influence on referees in favour of Barcelona in football matches. That is a much harder thing to establish, but there are ways. As far as I am aware, the prosecution in that regard has zero evidence so Barca won't be stripped of anything and people will go on thinking that was a great era, except for people who already hate Barcelona of course.If you have enough money you can pretty much get away with anything, regardless of whether or not you actually committed a crime. That's not something that should be used as a defence though, especially in a sport where money usually dictates who wins these days.
I think you're confusing hard facts with something else. Hard facts are things that actually happened, not what a person or organisation is punished for. Going by your definition Maradona didn't punch the ball into the net against England because a goal was awarded and he wasn't punished for it. Do you not see where that logic leads eventually?
What a ridiculous question.
No one even starts with SAF.
Can you imagine Pep without the backing of all the oil money?
He'd be another Allardyce.
Have you ever wondered why it is Barcelona being investigated for such serious referee bribes and no other club? Or why UEFA and the PL have 115 charges against City and no other club in their history comes close to that many serious charges?I'm not confusing anything with anything. The Maradona example is a terrible one because millions of people literally saw it happen. We are talking about things that are alleged but not established or proven by tribunals or similar legal or administrative bodies. Take the Barca case for example. The argument is not whether money was paid to that guy, however dodgy that looks. What you have to prove (and what is alleged) is a direct link between money paid and influence on referees in favour of Barcelona in football matches. That is a much harder thing to establish, but there are ways. As far as I am aware, the prosecution in that regard has zero evidence so Barca won't be stripped of anything and people will go on thinking that was a great era, except for people who already hate Barcelona of course.
Yep. Funny how quickly so many have forgotten that all his achievements at Barca were a farce.Wasn't he also Barcelona manager when they were bribing refs?
Yep. Funny how quickly so many have forgotten that all his achievements at Barca were a farce.
They had to dope the players with PEDs to achieve that.The footballl they played weren't a farce. It created a short revolution in football where teams tried to play their brand.
This sportwswashing exercise is proving surprisingly effective it seems.
It might be an unpopular opinion but I believe Claudio Ranieri winning the Premier League with Leicester was a bigger achievement than anything Pep has done so far.
Poch comes close with coming 3rd in a two horse race.I thought the goal of sportswashing is to try and improve the reputation of a state, but it makes sense that it’s actually to try and trick people into thinking Guardiola is a better manager than he really is
I don’t think that’s an unpopular opinion. Ranieri winning the PL with Leicester is the greatest premier league achievement of all time. No other achievement in the PL matches it.
They had to dope the players with PEDs to achieve that.
People will forget if there is no proof and no sanctions. And I can wonder why this or that till the cows come home, it doesn't prove guilt. I can wonder why Ronaldo has been accused of rape and hundreds of other footballers haven't been; it doesn't mean he's definitely a rapist and all the other players are definitely not.Have you ever wondered why it is Barcelona being investigated for such serious referee bribes and no other club? Or why UEFA and the PL have 115 charges against City and no other club in their history comes close to that many serious charges?
People won’t forget. People still remember his doping scandal as a player or the Barca Chelsea 2009 referee „performance“.
But sure, if there are people to who cheating doesn’t matter and they excuse it with „they have not been punished yet“, then „fair“ enough.
Poch comes close with coming 3rd in a two horse race.
Achieving things at Southampton that no other manager has achieved yet or will probably not achieve in awhile
At Psg, he coached an uncoachable team into the champion league semi finals, won all the domestic cups
Well said.I think you’re being very unfair there, Amadeus also mentioned his achievements at Southampton and PSG that you conveniently left out!
Although I do have to point out, that Poch got an 8th place finish at Southampton, which while genuinely impressive, Koeman
finished 6th and 7th in the next two seasons, and widely lambasted for his time there Puel finished 8th the season after Koeman.
And getting to the semi finals with PSG was a good achievement, but the season before Tuchel also won all the domestic cups, won the league, and got to the finals of the Champions league.
I’m sorry Amadeus you’re an entertaining poster and I respect that you’re willing to go against the grain, but you made this post too easy.
Yep. Funny how quickly so many have forgotten that all his achievements at Barca were a farce.
Um no. This looks like a textbook case of "I'm bitter and salty'' .You are right.
Who cares if Agassi cheated? On the court he was magnificent. And he was never convicted nor punished. He couldn't be, he was even protected by the ATP.
Who cares if Barcelona cheated and was protected by several executives to not be convicted? On the pitch it was clear Pep was the best manager. You gotta keep to the pitch to assess.
Sometimes at night, I just close my eyes and imagine Armstrong was never convicted and punished. Oh my, what a fine cyclist he was. Pity he was caught.
Didn't the ref chief already admit he was being paid to help their interests??
This looks like a textbook case of Pep Guardiola is my idol
Yep. Funny how quickly so many have forgotten that all his achievements at Barca were a farce.
Exactly!In one.
Amazing that when it comes to Fergie a lot of these experts ignore he's still the last manager to win a European trophy with a Scottish team, last manager to beat Real in a European final, last manager of a team outside of Celtic and Rangers to win the Scottish top flight and that's before you get to his acheivements with us