Recently I’ve been quite excited about the prospect of getting Kane this summer which would make any deal for Sancho impossible.
A front 5 of Kane, Rashford, Greenwood, Pogba and Bruno would be incredible. However, I do think that, all things considered, Sancho makes more sense.
1. The Kane transfer may not be possible and would certainly be long and protracted. Sancho should hopefully be easier to get over the line this year if Dortmund have relaxed the fee somewhat.
2. Kane would be more expensive and would severely limit our ability to strengthen other areas.
3. We would still be exposed on right wing if we signed Kane and there would be less opportunities for Greenwood to play CF.
4. Sancho is younger and will be important for the long-term.
4. Kane is more injury prone
I think on the whole, Sancho gives us more options and combinations.
There may be concerns that he is a similar type to some of the technical forwards we have but Cavani is the perfect compliment to these players providing he can maintain fitness.
There may also be the concern that this pushes Greenwood out of the starting XI but with the number of games there should still be plenty of opportunity for him to get games either at RW or CF. Most importantly of all, Ole believes in him.
The possible combinations by fixing the right wing issue are very exciting:
LW: Rashford/Pogba/Sancho/James/Martial
CF: Cavani/Martial/Greenwood/Rashford
RW: Sancho/Greenwood/Amad/James
One of the biggest conundrums facing Ole is whether to continue with Pogba on the left or to try and fit him and Bruno into a midfield. We would need a new DM to make this work and I’m not sure such a player exists.
Again, over the course of a season I’m sure we would see Pogba used in different positions for different opposition when fit.