Yep and they're only on their first season. By mid-season 2 we'll have seen some much more messed up stuff than that.
And Abradolf Lincler. His moral choices would have been great in that context.I wanted to see Squanchie in Interstellar.
I can't remember Abradolf Lincler. Wasn't he a robot?And Abradolf Lincler. His moral choices would have been great in that context.
You don't remember him?! You fool!I can't remember Abradolf Lincler. Wasn't he a robot?
It's a figure of speech RiP; He's a bureaucrat RiP, I don't respect him!You don't remember him?! You fool!
It's a figure of speech RiP; He's a bureaucrat RiP, I don't respect him!
The equation to solve gravity.Absolutely stunning film and score, bit slow in areas and plotline but thoroughly enjoyed it.
I do wonder what Coop was telling his daughter that he knew from the inside of the black hole that led to the survival of the Human race?
Definitely agreed with that - not often these days you get a big budget film that argues for space travel and does a really good job of showing the realities of it.I've chimed in earlier, but this film's been at the forefront of my mind for a week now, and I feel like fleshing out my two cents.
I loved the structuring of it and everything. The slow start was excellent, portraying a science literate protagonist, who in addition was a good father, but without falling into pitfalls of making him seem like an arrogant know-it-all, or like he's trying real hard to seem smart. I also love the fact that they had such patience in illustrating the procedure of going into space, the cutting of the engines, the utter silence, and the slight nod to 2001 in the zoomed out perspective of the spaceship passing Saturn and its rings.
I also like that they took the time to show a bit of the aftermath, instead of going "we've solved it, and now; who knows!" and cutting out of the film.
Less excited about the weird rambly plea of passion to trust in the universal force of love, which seemed weirder still with it being dismissed straight after. And though I get time constraints, the daughter's instant recognition that daddy talks through a watch and is giving cosmic insights seemed quite premature. Surely if Coop had coached her properly in science, she'd hold off on that.
I'm willing to forgive a few cringey moments for what is visually beautiful, illustrating a very real notion with the way our custody of the planet is panning out, and I'm super-excited that there can be a market for and an interest in making a film where pulling ourselves up by the bootstraps of science is so strongly emphasised. Hopefully it's one of several signs of the zeitgeist turning, though I'm not holding my breath.
I've chimed in earlier, but this film's been at the forefront of my mind for a week now, and I feel like fleshing out my two cents.
I loved the structuring of it and everything. The slow start was excellent, portraying a science literate protagonist, who in addition was a good father, but without falling into pitfalls of making him seem like an arrogant know-it-all, or like he's trying real hard to seem smart. I also love the fact that they had such patience in illustrating the procedure of going into space, the cutting of the engines, the utter silence, and the slight nod to 2001 in the zoomed out perspective of the spaceship passing Saturn and its rings.
I also like that they took the time to show a bit of the aftermath, instead of going "we've solved it, and now; who knows!" and cutting out of the film.
Less excited about the weird rambly plea of passion to trust in the universal force of love, which seemed weirder still with it being dismissed straight after. And though I get time constraints, the daughter's instant recognition that daddy talks through a watch and is giving cosmic insights seemed quite premature. Surely if Coop had coached her properly in science, she'd hold off on that.
I'm willing to forgive a few cringey moments for what is visually beautiful, illustrating a very real notion with the way our custody of the planet is panning out, and I'm super-excited that there can be a market for and an interest in making a film where pulling ourselves up by the bootstraps of science is so strongly emphasised. Hopefully it's one of several signs of the zeitgeist turning, though I'm not holding my breath.
It wasn't.
The characters dismissed it, as they should've because its absolute nonsense, but its utterly essential to the film.
Two of the major plot points are based on it e.g. Brand being right about Edmunds planet and Murph knowing that the ghost was her dad. Without either of those things the human race dies out.
After Mann blew up part of the ship, they didn't have enough life support or fuel to get back to Earth. Prior to that they could've, and Coop was going to do so.Can someone just remind me; did they find out that they had no way of getting back to earth through the worm hole?
Without it being dismissed and them going onto the Damon planet, Coop doesn't go into the black hole/tesseract.
Partial credit, though.
Yes, but thats the characters dismissing it. The film itself never does.
After Mann blew up part of the ship, they didn't have enough life support or fuel to get back to Earth. Prior to that they could've, and Coop was going to do so.
Fair enough.
And surely we can agree that the scene was quite cringe-worthy, and that Hathaway's character seemed to come across as a wishful thinker rather than as a strong-of-mind, science-savvy astronaut?
You think the whole tesseract part shouldn't have been in the film? I'm a tad surprised, it was pretty essential to it and it's part of what made me love the film so much personally.
Yes and yes.
To be honest, that segment alone didn't irritate me too much but its later significance to the part in the tesseract does.
I honestly think it would have been a better film if that went unexplained and the last thing we see after Coop ejects is him being picked up again by the Cooperstation. Did we really need to be told who the 'they' were? And if we weren't is the fact that Coop ejected into a blackhole and then was found in Saturn 67 years later actually less believable than just simply arriving there?
The other part that really annoyed me was Millers planet. Supposedly a bunch of scientists who worked out that 1 hour on that planet would equal a decade couldn't work out that she had only been there for 30 minutes and could have had no significant data. (And by that logic, why was she sending the thumbs up in the first place?).
I thought it was still important in showing how it was gravity (though of course by then we know this) and how Coop manipulated it (visually stunning for me). It was the climax of the film and I'm glad they went through it, I struggle to imagine the film without that part!
Nah I'm not arguing that it's brilliant, just wanted to share my feeling on that part (and my surprise given how I felt about it and how different your sentiment was).I guess its each to their own. If you liked that part of the story line then I suppose its brilliant and the crowning moment of the film. I didn't and thought it let down an otherwise excellent film about space exploration, humanity, and survival, by its focus on love being some ridiculous force. It could have done without that and still had all the genuinely touching human moments involving Coop and the loss (effectively) of his family.
What did you hate the most about it?