I would argue this with you but it's a no brainer. It's like debating who is better between Rooney and Robbie Keane.
A 60 year old who plays on internet forums all day, can't muster a civil debate, & looks at screen shots of Street Fighter games....
If it wasn't so rediculous - I'd believe you!
What next? Gilchrist is better than Richards because he's got a better average(I think he has, but you get the point)
I might know why Kallis has some good statistics - They played Pak who had injuries to Asif, Shoaib, and Gul. Sami was the main bowler Kallis proceeded to get a few centuries and one double ton. Easy easy.
He might be a good all rounder but Sachin is one of the best batsmen around. If there was one batsmen from the last two years who I'd pick for a side it would be from Lara, Sachin, and Inzaman. Ponting looks like a gimp.
There's definitely no bias from me - Born and bred in England but support Pak through my roots. (Is this weird to other folk?)
One thing though: Kallis > India's 1st innings batting performance
It isn't now. Gilchrist's poor form over the last 2 years or so cost him an average over 50.
By the way, can we stop all this 'Kallis vs Sachin' crap and start doing more of what we should be doing and that is laughing at India.
Do you actually think Kallis is better than Tendulkar?
Dippersripper is going to hunt you down and kill you.
eastender, i like your location.