RedC
Votes Fine Gael.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2011
- Messages
- 6,948
I think we should stay miles clear of any players that are underperforming in their current team, Utd at the moment is not the kind of environment that can reinvigorate these players.
Any 2 of Haaland, Ziyech, Erikson, Van Der Beek or Bale and we instantly go up a level as a team
Where would Martial play.
Why should he play? He isn't a true striker and injury-prone, and in genaral he is overrated.
He can be Haland's bakcup or if necessary play on the wing when Rashford or James aren't fit.
He is better than Rashford
Also Haaland would be a similar mistake to Lukaku. Great goal scorers but all round game lacking. We would need to have more creative wide players than Rashford and James for him to work
I disagree.
Rashford is better than Martial and has been much more effective than him lately.
Haaland is very different from Lukaku, he can seem slow beacause of his height but unlike Lukaku he moves a lot on the pitch, i would compare him more with Ibrahimovic than with Lukaku.
Also it doesn't make sense to play without a true striker unless you have a team that plays tiki-taka like Spain in 2010.
We need to play with a 4-3-3 due to our players features and Haland and Eriksen are what we still miss, it would be also a very balanced formation.
-------------------Haland--------------------
---Rashford-----------------------James----
------------Pogba--------Eriksen------------
-----------------McTominay------------------
Shaw-----Maguire-----Lindelof------Bissaka
-----------------De Gea----------------------
So basically you think Haland is better than martial? Very interesting.If we would be able to sign in January at least Haland and Eriksen it would be a big improvement, we could have a lineup like this:
-------------------Haland--------------------
---Rashford-----------------------James----
------------Pogba--------Eriksen------------
-----------------McTominay------------------
Shaw-----Maguire-----Lindelof------Bissaka
-----------------De Gea----------------------
Then during the summer if Pogba goes we can sign Maddison, and search for other improvements.
You've lost all credibility placing mctominay as the DM in a 4-3-3. He is clearly more suited to a box to box midfielder. Also rashford has not been more effective than Martial. He has only played more games. Dont confuse the difference. The team needs Martial more than it needs rashford.I disagree.
Rashford is better than Martial and has been much more effective than him lately.
Haaland is very different from Lukaku, he can seem slow beacause of his height but unlike Lukaku he moves a lot on the pitch, i would compare him more with Ibrahimovic than with Lukaku.
Also it doesn't make sense to play without a true striker unless you have a team that plays tiki-taka like Spain in 2010.
We need to play with a 4-3-3 due to our players features and Haland and Eriksen are what we still miss, it would be also a very balanced formation.
-------------------Haland--------------------
---Rashford-----------------------James----
------------Pogba--------Eriksen------------
-----------------McTominay------------------
Shaw-----Maguire-----Lindelof------Bissaka
-----------------De Gea----------------------
I disagree.
Rashford is better than Martial and has been much more effective than him lately.
Haaland is very different from Lukaku, he can seem slow beacause of his height but unlike Lukaku he moves a lot on the pitch, i would compare him more with Ibrahimovic than with Lukaku.
Also it doesn't make sense to play without a true striker unless you have a team that plays tiki-taka like Spain in 2010.
We need to play with a 4-3-3 due to our players features and Haland and Eriksen are what we still miss, it would be also a very balanced formation.
-------------------Haland--------------------
---Rashford-----------------------James----
------------Pogba--------Eriksen------------
-----------------McTominay------------------
Shaw-----Maguire-----Lindelof------Bissaka
-----------------De Gea----------------------
OMG, i can't believe what i'm reading.So basically you think Haland is better than martial? Very interesting.
McTominay is developing as a box to box midfielder but he can play also as a DM. Unless you are a Matic fan there isn't any other player in the roster who can play as DM.You've lost all credibility placing mctominay as the DM in a 4-3-3. He is clearly more suited to a box to box midfielder. Also rashford has not been more effective than Martial. He has only played more games. Dont confuse the difference. The team needs Martial more than it needs rashford.
I know this is a risk but he is the only realistic signing we could make right now. We weren't able to take Bruno Fernandes during the summer, and i don't think that Maddison will go anywhere in January, so the only player who can provide us quality in the midfield is Eriksen. Then if we consider that Pogba could leave during the summer i would sign Eriksen now and try to take Maddison in the summer.If United have learnt anything from the Sanchez fiasco its to stay away from Eriksen for a variety of reasons.
Your completely wrong mate. Martial has more skill than any of our forward line and Haaland and him up front, with Rashford out wide, is the best way to use all 3.Why should he play? He isn't a true striker and injury-prone, and in genaral he is overrated.
He can be Haland's bakcup or if necessary play on the wing when Rashford or James aren't fit.
We won't be signing anyone. If we can't do deals in the summer, what's makes people think we can do them during a extremely short period and where teams will probably get the same deal in the summer anyway. Half these guys being linked aren't playing regularly plus coming to a new team, you might not see any form until Feb/March anyway. It happens but it's rare it's successful in general.....
Eriksen is still playing every game.We won't be signing anyone. If we can't do deals in the summer, what's makes people think we can do them during a extremely short period and where teams will probably get the same deal in the summer anyway. Half these guys being linked aren't playing regularly plus coming to a new team, you might not see any form until Feb/March anyway. It happens but it's rare it's successful in general.....
Eriksen is still playing every game.
Fernandes is playing every game
Mousa Dembele is playing every game
Soumare is playing every game
Haaland plays every game
These are only some of the players we are presumedly interested in. Yes Mandzukic has not played but says he is still training hard.
I think we will buy a midfielder, we might have a better chance to sign some players in January than we would in the summer when there will be more competition
Why a midfielder? We have lost games because of the midfield. Pogs comes back in that side makes a difference any and if he leaves in the summer, we aren't gonna sign his replacement in Jan....
Was having a debate yesterday with a Watford supporting friend, and we concluded that United need to start winning games and pull away from the bottom 3. Come January, if we're still down towards the bottom, your Watfords, Southamptons would be better placed to buy players to improve the team than us! Why? Because the level of player they're going for will be realistic for that task. We can't buy solid mid table premier league players, because whilst the sad truth is in some positions, like number 10, or left back, or central midfield, or right wing, that would strengthen us, we just can't go and buy such players. Our goals will be much higher. But the players we want to sign, Maddison, Haaland, etc etc are not going to want to join us in January. They won't want to join us in January anyway, so there's no point going for them, but in January if we're in a relegation scrap we won't be in a position to bring the players we need in. Unless we pay over the odds, panic gamble and spend ridiculous amounts of wages on the task. Sound familiar?
Actually, someone like Eriksen might be a good player in that he's not past it and would be relatively cheap and he's proven quality. But we turned down the chance in the summer because Ole wasn't convinced he wanted to make the move. So on a philosophical level, we'd be panicking and buying someone we withdrew interest from, and even if it worked out, it would still be a panic buy and one that proves we're not thinking things through.
The double whammy is because we're so bad, we have to pay more to bring players in, both transfer fees but especially wages because we're not in the champions league or even Europa next season, and everything gets exacerbated.
Gone off on a bit of a tangent, the point is I can't see who we can sign in January. Like not a single player that would want to join, that would make financial sense or make sense to the arriving player. Eriksen might make a bit of sense to us in some regard, but we'll be ridiculously expensive to the wage budget, and he'll be leaving an underperforming team for another under-performing team, but the latter paying him like 300k per week. In other words, for money only. not for footballing reasons. As for anyone else, they'll either be subs at their current clubs, aging and seeking one final contract and very expensive to the wage budget. No currently performing, high class player under 25 will even look at us.
A quality CM, whatever the money, push Pogba into the position behind the front 3 and we could really start to improve. I understand the need/push for a striker but I doubt we will get 2 players in and, for me, the CM is our biggest weak link at the moment. You could argue that we need 2 x CM before any other position.
I don't think Pogba is half as effective when played deeper, so he has to play further up and be our creative force.
If the club try to tell us that there isn't a quality CM that could be bought in January then I would have to doubt the 'money is there' quote.
Don't think we'll be able to find a suitable striker or RW in Jan
I never said we would sign them in January. I said These are the players we are PRESUMEDLY interested in.Eriksen isn't and some of those players were available in the summer and we didn't think they were good enough then, so why do you think we'd sign them in Jan? Some of those are unproven in prem or completely out of form. It's makes no sense. Also which is a slightly different argument, I'm not sure they improve us anyway. On paper maybe but we all know without no structure, pattern of play or different styles of play....it doesn't matter who you sign.
We would get overrun in midfield nearly every game.I disagree.
Rashford is better than Martial and has been much more effective than him lately.
Haaland is very different from Lukaku, he can seem slow beacause of his height but unlike Lukaku he moves a lot on the pitch, i would compare him more with Ibrahimovic than with Lukaku.
Also it doesn't make sense to play without a true striker unless you have a team that plays tiki-taka like Spain in 2010.
We need to play with a 4-3-3 due to our players features and Haland and Eriksen are what we still miss, it would be also a very balanced formation.
-------------------Haland--------------------
---Rashford-----------------------James----
------------Pogba--------Eriksen------------
-----------------McTominay------------------
Shaw-----Maguire-----Lindelof------Bissaka
-----------------De Gea----------------------
I never said we would sign them in January. I said These are the players we are PRESUMEDLY interested in.
Ole said we are interested in signing 2 players in January a Midfielder and a Striker, and these are only a list of players mentioned in the medias.
My own take on this is, IF we are lucky enough to be able to bring 2 players here in January it will be, Mandzukic and Eriksen, imo.
I never said we would sign them in January. I said These are the players we are PRESUMEDLY interested in.
Ole said we are interested in signing 2 players in January a Midfielder and a Striker, and these are only a list of players mentioned in the medias.
My own take on this is, IF we are lucky enough to be able to bring 2 players here in January it will be, Mandzukic and Eriksen, imo.
Mandzukic is 33 and I think a deal is already done. I'm not saying I like it either.Let's hope you are completely wrong. One thing Ole has done well is recruitment and let's hope he continues to search for players with real desire and right age.
Ok @Litch we will have to wait and see what happens in January. Sure there could even be a complete change by then.Not sure with the bold? Ole said a lot of things that are not to see the light of day. We would not have to sign anyone if he played the young players and showed a little more trust in them, but that's a different argument.