XdanielredX
Full Member
De Gea better shot stopper and reflexes.
Big Pete better all round game and command of the area.
Big Pete better all round game and command of the area.
Don't get me wrong. Saying there weren't many good keepers isn't the same as saying there weren't any class keepers. And funnliy enough those guys and Preudhomme are only the ones I remember that rivaled Schmeichel. Still, I never thought "Hey, we got Schemichel, we'll be alright." and I think I even appreciated VDS even more than Schmeichel.Serious? Chilavert, Kahn, Seaman etc were all class keepers. If anything, the 90s and early 2000s had quite a few more solid 2nd tier keepers than what we see now.
Still don't think we'll have him after May.
10 or so games left to enjoy this beautiful man.
In fairness to Scmeichel, he had some howlers in his time. VDS was better for me, solid performances, dont remember any howlers from him. DDG has potential to outshine them but needs to do some more years between the posts to prove it.It's seemingly a toss-up between him and Schmeichel for many people, at this point. Is there an agreement that he's already ahead of Edwin though?
Did you see Big Pete at Newcastle in the 1995/96 season?
There weren't as many good keepers in Pete's time I'd say and it made him stand out. Think I'd pick DDG
Hey... Me first.
Big Pete
There weren't as many good keepers in Pete's time I'd say and it made him stand out. Think I'd pick DDG
De Gea > Schmeichel, though not by much. Over time and absent serious injury, De Gea >>> Schmeiechel.
Consider these facts: Pete didn't join United until he was 28 years old. De Gea is only 25 now.
Schmeichel had a substantially better back line (and squad all around him, of course) than De Gea has ever had.
Nope.The great Dane is still the best. Shit, he was the world's best for many years as well. Anyone saying DDG has been better simply didn't watch him enough
Peter vs DDG is an irrelevant debate to me. They're both at a certain level where any choice either way is made by such a small margin that it practically becomes irrelevant.
Although I will say that De Gea has age on his side to, possibly, improve... No idea how he can get better, but there you go.
De Gea > Schmeichel, though not by much. Over time and absent serious injury, De Gea >>> Schmeiechel.
Consider these facts: Pete didn't join United until he was 28 years old. De Gea is only 25 now.
Schmeichel had a substantially better back line (and squad all around him, of course) than De Gea has ever had.