OverratedOpinion
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2017
- Messages
- 8,446
What’s the story with Felix? loanable?
He's a 1 in 4 goalscorer who's best playing as a number 10.
What’s the story with Felix? loanable?
I know but it seems to be worth the gamble with rashford ability to play there as well, we gotta take those punts. Ten Hag is the right manager for the job. Get a 21 year old Weghorst or Harry Kane and we’ll see a real player builtFinding that kind of player is very tough
Martial is not going to leave. He spent 3/4 of last season out injured and earns £250k a week. Why would any club be dumb enough to buy him? He will leave next summer on a free.
If we somehow do sell him, I don't think we'll bring in a replacement. I expect us to use Hojlund, Rashford and Sancho there. The club may also be looking at using #11.
I know but it seems to be worth the gamble with rashford ability to play there as well, we gotta take those punts. Ten Hag is the right manager for the job. Get a 21 year old Weghorst or Harry Kane and we’ll see a real player built
We aren't getting one. We will buy Amrabat and a replacement for Maguire. We'll be done after that.We still need an actual backup 9 to Hojlund
I think Hojlund was the Martial replacement, and not the final answer to our CF problem. Rashford and perhaps Sancho will play there when he doesn't. Eventually, Hojlund must be the backup to fight for the starting spot with hopefully a more established signing in the years to come. I don't people register that Hojlund is over a year younger than Greenwood. Man's just a promising youth prospect.
We aren't getting one. We will buy Amrabat and a replacement for Maguire. We'll be done after that.
Alfredo Morelos is available on a free.
Worth a punt.
Depends what happens with MGIt looks like we're seriously trying to sell Martial, if he goes we only have Hojlund as a striker - Rashford can play there but wants to play on the left.
If Martial goes, who should we get as a backup striker? I don't think Kane is happening, not this year anyway.
TrueNobody is going to buy Martial so this debate is irrelevant
Toney in January maybe?
One worry I never see mentioned with Toney is that if he was suspended for gambling... There's a non zero chance it happens again. You know, with gambling being a possible addiction and all.
He extended his contact to 2026 a while ago.How come we aren’t even remotely linked with Morata. I know he isn’t the best goal scorer in the world but he offers so much more that ETH would like. Also he is 30, in his last year of contract and Athletics won’t mind selling him… fits all criterias
Is that the guy from Gent?Orban please
Yes, great little talent, good price supposedly tooIs that the guy from Gent?
Dembele has gone to Saudi.
Missed that, nevermind.Saudi
Ye he looks very good. Watched him once in the Europa and he got a first halve Hat trick.Yes, great little talent, good price supposedly too
"If we lose Martial"...
In what way do anyone think we'll lose him? Loan? Sale? Injuries for the rest of the season?
You don't know what you saw or heard (and neither do I, or anyone else here,). The accuser has thrown the veracity of all of this apparently conclusive evidence into question, sufficiently for the CPS to accept that they wouldn't be able to take a case forward. If a witness tells you they constructed and misrepresented AV materials respectively, then they might of course be covering something up in turn to protect a partner, but you (and everyone who viewed/heard) that material has to at least strongly consider whether it might not indeed have been manipulated. There's a reason why we've constructed systems of law that go beyond 'they're obviously guilty' or 'simple common sense' or ' you know, of course he did it...' Unfortunately the court of social media and associated, long-standing public hysteria hasn't caught up to this yet. But they're not standards of judgement that any of us should be subject to - what if you aggrieved your partner and they then created a fake audio file in which ' you' stated you were going to kill them, or uttered racial slurs, and posted this on social media? Would you want the world to listen to that audio and and take it as unimpeachable fact without enquiring more deeply into the circumstances. I'm not saying that happened here - in fact I think it's very unlikely - but even the least techsavvy (millennial or gen z person in particular) has access to mobile app tech that can create the most lifelike images or voice conversations.Sticking head above the parapet but here goes....
If Greenwood had been accused by a "party girl" of beating and raping her but there were no witnesses or any other evidence beyond he said/she said and the CPS decided there was no prospect of a conviction so therefor decided against proceeding with it then him coming back into the squad after a period of club suspension would have been expected and accepted.
But that wasn't the case was it. We are lead to believe that it was his partner at the time (still?) who released those disgusting visual and audio files for the whole world to see and hear of what this individual has been up to.
The terms innocent and guilty are legal terms and have no bearing on whether an individual actually committed the act/s in question, they have no relevance when we are able to see and hear the "evidence" ourselves.
The very thought that this individual might wear the shirt and represent this great club of ours ever again is reprehensible and why people here are including him in possible attacking formations I have no idea.
Sticking head above the parapet but here goes....
If Greenwood had been accused by a "party girl" of beating and raping her but there were no witnesses or any other evidence beyond he said/she said and the CPS decided there was no prospect of a conviction so therefor decided against proceeding with it then him coming back into the squad after a period of club suspension would have been expected and accepted.
But that wasn't the case was it. We are lead to believe that it was his partner at the time (still?) who released those disgusting visual and audio files for the whole world to see and hear of what this individual has been up to.
The terms innocent and guilty are legal terms and have no bearing on whether an individual actually committed the act/s in question, they have no relevance when we are able to see and hear the "evidence" ourselves.
The very thought that this individual might wear the shirt and represent this great club of ours ever again is reprehensible and why people here are including him in possible attacking formations I have no idea.
You don't know what you saw or heard (and neither do I, or anyone else here,). The accuser has thrown the veracity of all of this apparently conclusive evidence into question, sufficiently for the CPS to accept that they wouldn't be able to take a case forward. If a witness tells you they constructed and misrepresented AV materials respectively, then they might of course be covering something up in turn to protect a partner, but you (and everyone who viewed/heard) that material has to at least strongly consider whether it might not indeed have been manipulated. There's a reason why we've constructed systems of law that go beyond 'they're obviously guilty' or 'simple common sense' or ' you know, of course he did it...' Unfortunately the court of social media and associated, long-standing public hysteria hasn't caught up to this yet. But they're not standards of judgement that any of us should be subject to - what if you aggrieved your partner and they then created a fake audio file in which ' you' stated you were going to kill them, or uttered racial slurs, and posted this on social media? Would you want the world to listen to that audio and and take it as unimpeachable fact without enquiring more deeply into the circumstances. I'm not saying that happened here - in fact I think it's very unlikely - but even the least techsavvy (millennial or gen z person in particular) has access to mobile app tech that can create the most lifelike images or voice conversations.
You can, say, argue that domestic abuse is a serious thing that ought to be addressed at the level of law and stricter sentences as well as pushing back against misogynistic influencers essentially condoning this, whilst also arguing that lots of people are jumping on the MG 'case' for their own clicks or validation and virtue-signalling (or just as oppos) or to get funding for their organizations. Both of those things can be true at the same time. MG can be someone with a history of toxic behaviour and also a scapegoat who isn't guilty of the criminal charges which were levied against him and who has reunited with his partner. Again, both things can be true.
None of that is to suggest that the initial conclusion wasn't true, but you cant pre-emptively convict someone based on that, nor terminate their contract based upon a supposition (at least not someone with proper employment protection, like a footballer, unlike your average agency worker , say ). There's plenty of circumstantial evidence to suggest MG was an awful boyfriend and even verbally abusive at the time, but you cant terminate a contract purely over that (it depends, of course, what can be unequivocally attributed to him). You can treat it like a PR issue combined with a disciplinary issue, with the player offering suitable contrition, much like we've had players elsewhere do community service or take fines or 'make up' for using racial slurs or bringing their club/the game into disrepute etc. But at the moment it's a kangaroo court via twitter and protest...
No.
CF: Hojlund, Rashford, Sancho, MG
LW: Rashford, Garnacho, Sancho
RW: Antony, Sancho, Diallo, MG
That's 8 player for forward 3.