Sylar
Full Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 41,320
Dropping pandya on 0 was insane
Probably cost Australia about 50-60 runs
Probably cost Australia about 50-60 runs
He's not bad.And there are some here who think he is a bad commentator
Indeed. I was actually sceptical about picking him ahead of Shami, but he's done well both games.Bhuvi has bowled really well. He will get a wicket if hes given a couple of more overs
The first rule of cricket is if the ball hits the wicket, the batsman is out.
Anything that doesn't allow that to be enforced should simply be changed.
Bails were more or less used so that it was visible to the eye if wickets were actually hit. Hence the at least one bail dislodge rule. Currently the bails are not fulfilling the very function they are supposed to.That’s not the rule though is it
Christ.That’s not the rule though is it
Bails were more or less used so that it was visible to the eye if wickets were actually hit. Hence the at least one bail dislodge rule. Currently the bails are not fulfilling the very function they are supposed to.
After Warner is striking slower than himThis pitch is so fecking easy. Rohits innings now looking more pathetic.
Aren't the Aussies being a bit too cautious?
30 odd runs in 10 overs is very slow, especially with the pitch expected to slow down a bit and with spinners incoming
But Warner being there is a big plus
After Warner is striking slower than him
Gotta give it to you and your persistent wumming.Its a massively risky tactic. Luckily the others bailed him out. Id rate his innings if this was the 96 world cup.
Chahal will enjoy it even more. It's exactly where he thrivesAussie will need to go after Kuldeep big. Itll cost them
That 96 wc had jaya and co striking at 200+. Terrible exampleIts a massively risky tactic. Luckily the others bailed him out. Id rate his innings if this was the 96 world cup.
Gotta give it to you and your persistent wumming.
That 96 wc had jaya and co striking at 200+. Terrible example
Christ.
India need a wicket
India need a wicket
Once more.India need a wicket