Just drop Ali for an extra bowler. Don't need this much batting depth plus Root can bowl a few.
Wood was their best bowler today.
Before the first game, I was thinking what's Plunkett doing in this team.Shouldn't have dropped Plunkett anyway, he is so crucial in the middle overs
How about a valuable and quick 15-20 runs or maybe hanging there and scoring some good runs when the team in down. Like I said never seen him do that. Woakes has done that from time to time. Point is if given the choice I would have Woakes ahead of Jadeja or even Ashwin the batsmen ahead of Jadeja.Under that criteria, most are frauds. Think about it, how much can you impact a game at no.8?
Just drop Ali for an extra bowler. Don't need this much batting depth plus Root can bowl a few.
Another. Wonderful bowling. Wahabs brilliant to watch when hes bowling at pace.
Fancy losing a game against Pakistan because they outfielded you.
Say what you want, Pakistan just won't lost that unpredictable tag and for good reason. I was 50/50 going into this before hand. England seemed way too confident. Their bowling to Pakistan was also very naive, bowling short as if their some minnows.
Wonderful cricket. Now watch them lose to Afghanistan
Ali was our best bowler today. 3 for 50 Wood was second with 2 for 53. Woakes got 3 wickets but an economy of 8.88 is just not good enough in ODI.Just drop Ali for an extra bowler. Don't need this much batting depth plus Root can bowl a few.
Their next game is against SL. Very good opportunity to beat them and get some momentum before facing India. I won't be surprised if come June 16th Pakistan has more points than India and are more confident.
Pakistan dropped two catches and a stumping if I'm not wrong.
You're gonna play wounded saffers who I can't see losing 3 on the bounce.Is India in this tournament? Everyone else seem to be having all the fun.
It is.I suspect this is was a better bowling line up than the one England faced in the warm ups.
This is Pakistan. They might lose to Sri Lanka (okay very unlikely) and beat India (okay, also unlikely). But yeah I think they'll do find versus the lankans.
Pak India will be close now at least. India will win it though. England started believing their own hype while the Indian team seems to know their vulnerability quite well.
For some reason I see India losing to S.A which will then put them on a winning streak to get to the top 4 at which stage anything can happen.
I agree. The only problem is that I think he bowled the best of the 3 of them in my opinion.I really like Wood but I just don't think that him ,Woakes and Archer is the best balance. Not really sure how but Plunkett always manages wickets in the middle overs which is the most important thing in Odi cricket
Which tells you how shit England's effort was.
I suspect this is was a better bowling line up than the one England faced in the warm ups.
I agree. The only problem is that I think he bowled the best of the 3 of them in my opinion.
Shadab makes a huge difference to the team.
I'd play Tom Curran. He'd of got those runs at the end and I don't think he'd of gone for 8+ an over.Pre WC I wanted him and Archer but considering Moeen can't buy a run right now Woakes has to play and I don't think Archer will be dropped after 1 bad game
Shadab, Wahab and Amir are class. Never been a fan of Hassan Ali.
How about a valuable and quick 15-20 runs or maybe hanging there and scoring some good runs when the team in down. Like I said never seen him do that. Woakes has done that from time to time. Point is if given the choice I would have Woakes ahead of Jadeja or even Ashwin the batsmen ahead of Jadeja.
It's almost like they're inconsistent, erratic cricketers in an inconsistent, erratic cricket team.It's funny how the feelings about Pak cricketers changes so quickly. Wahab is going to get smashed around pretty soon
Although it's no comparison, he reminds me of Akhtar and 90's Pakistan bowlers. The rest of the current batch don't seem to have that aggression they were always known for.
Looking at his significant scores, he has:
95 (92)
34 (19)
68 (83)
39 (27)
53 (36)
78 (82)
he also has a few not so fast 30s.
Ill compare to Jadeja (averages 29.9 in ODIs)
60 (77)
30 (17)
57 (103)
61 (61)
78 (89)
61 (37)
47 (29)
66 (45)
62 (54)
87 (68)
Be the judge yourself.
It's almost like they're inconsistent, erratic cricketers in an inconsistent, erratic cricket team.
Good for him. Still don't rate him. Don't get me wrong I would love to see Jadeja banging some runs and winning us matches but till then I would always see him as a guy who doesn't deliver with the bat when it matters. I don't see him as a match winner by any means. Again, happy to be proven wrong this WC.
Won us CT17 though but has been off form for a while.