Throw in some chow mein and it would be fine.a Fred Rice central midfield?
Throw in some chow mein and it would be fine.a Fred Rice central midfield?
He isn't good enough for a fluid system that doesn't allow him to just poach goals.
Its a weird one. I think hes a level above Lukaku because of his attitude, mentality in big games and general movement, but a striker isnt our biggest need. Would also leave us with the same problem positions (right wing, midfield, defence), though with a striker who could potentially be brilliant for us and the league. In a normal scenario, I would 100% do a straight swap for Icardi, but given all of our needs elsewhere, I'd definitely try to get Skriniar as the swapped player to sort out our CBs.
Basically wouldnt say no, but would suggest other things if possible.
I don't think such a lineup is possibleDi Marzio mentioned that a Lukaku - Icardi swap deal was possible.
If it is true that Pogba wants out we could be looking at a 442 with this player:
Icardi RashfordAlthough you would pray for another central midfielder. I don't know if Bruno Fernandes would work in a two although he does have a good defensive work rate. Maybe Rabiot?
Martial Fred Rice Sancho
Shaw Alderweireld Lindelöf Meunier
De Gea
Yeah. That's why I'm not against it since if we lose Lukaku, our striker position becomes very reliant on a few young players with our depth being Greenwood who is 17.... so it would also become a problem, just not as pressing as the non existant options at RW, RB, what our midfield will be once Herrera and Pogba leave and the shit CB options.Tbh, with striker not being our biggest need, a swap deal becomes even more sensible. Of course we would still have the needs you mentioned, and we can use the budget to try and resolve them. The only difference would be that with any luck, we’d have traded a centre forward for a more clinical one.
Avoid, he’s very limited striker & he’s an Argentine. We aren’t very good dealing with them in history. If we want a striker get Jovic. And please, can we do more research background before we sign a player that cost a lot. This is what failing us a lot post Fergie. Take the lukaku’s Money and use it wisely on the right players.
Swap Lukaku with Icardi then hire Giggs to take care of Wanda Nara.
We can’t keep filling our team with 21 year olds. Forgive me if I’m wrong but I believe that’s Jovic’s age. I’m not against Jovic, I just think if we get him, then we’d need to compromise elsewhere and not go after another 20 year old but instead more experience.
As for Icardi, could go either way here, but on a swap, it’s worth the gamble I think, as the alternative is just keeping Lukaku, and he’s a known quantity at least.
Doesn't seem like there's any available player out there good enough for the Caf
This summer is going to be so much fun.
Does any top team play with a striker like this though? I don't think you can really play with just 9 outfield players unless you're just on a different level to the opposition which will rarely happen in a competitive league.He just needs to be in a dominant team I think. So long as his team has the most possession and can regularly get the ball in and around the box, he’s the closest 9 you can get to a guarantee of goals. In our current team though, he’d touch the ball twice a game!
I would make this trade all day. The current iteration of Rom is one of the worst finishers Ive ever seen
Point stands. Technically we are not getting an upgrade ( probably a bit but not really that elite level).He's a proven goalscorer who can't trap a ball and whose technique is not fitting for a top 4 side.
He's Everton and WBA level yet we spunked 70m on him
As tempting as it is with our lack of quality in the final third I just can’t be doing with United being a constant soap opera.
/threadNo thanks to the Icardashian soap opera.
They can have Lukaku on a free for all I care.
Point stands. Technically we are not getting an upgrade ( probably a bit but not really that elite level).
He thrives on service and Perisic provides it consistently at Inter .Who is going to give on our side? If the answer is we are going to sign someone, then why not sign someone and see if it works with Lukaku especially given that Icardi has zero involvement in build up( not really that elite)
Also, has he ever played in 2 striker formation ?
Hi to All i am a supporter of FC Internazionale but my fav team in England is MU.
I was reading this thread .....
Well my humble opinion ... Icardi is a world class striker , in the box is the best player i have ever seen in my team.
It is very untrue he cannot play outside the box , for me he is the most talented player also outside the box.
Our problem is the lack of quality behind him Perisic is a consistent player but quality is low , Naingolan is just garbage and Politano is another awful player ( he can't cross he is not smart he cannot score basically useless )
Icardi would benefit from playing in a dominant team and with quality players surrounding him anyway, my opinion is that he would become instantly the best striker playing in Europe.
He has everything, headshot, right, left, he is quick, he is very fast and never slows down the action.
If my team decides to swap him for Lukaku i'll ask if they are mentally sane or not.
a Fred Rice central midfield?