Brophs
The One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 52,158
Beckham's an absolute fecking country mile behind Carrick at this stage in his career. He'd be killed in the PL if he came back.
Hmm, maybe not, but still miles ahead of Carrick and Anderson. We brought Scholes back, what kind of message does that send out?
Fair enough Carrick has played better these last couple of weeks, but Beckham is still better, even at the age he is. Class is permanent.
Bizarre thread
He's in the Emirates at the moment. Commentators speculating he might be there to make a deal.
He often trains with Arsenal or Tottenham doesn't he, and he is obviously from the area. Wouldn't surprise me either way.
Hmm, maybe not, but still miles ahead of Carrick and Anderson. We brought Scholes back, what kind of message does that send out?
Fair enough Carrick has played better these last couple of weeks, but Beckham is still better, even at the age he is. Class is permanent.
Class is permanent.
Makes us a normal being at times.Sentimentality. I'd always thought it was the domain of the old.
At 36 years old, he'd still be the best crosser of the ball, the best passer of the ball, the best freekick taker and the best taking corners in our team.
Surely a wind up? Either that or you've been infected with retard syndrome.
Same question to you.There isn't enough bandwidth available for the number of laughing/Houllier smilies this deserves.
What? a bit nasty that is. Ok tell me in what ways is Carrick a better footballer than Becks? Yeah he is younger and can probably run around a bit more, and I'll grant that Carrick is probably better at breaking up play because that is all he does. Is that it?
Well, Carrick is a regular starter and key component of one of the world's biggest and most successful football teams, whereas Beckham regularly performs poorly for one of the world's weakest and least successful football teams.
It's not difficult to understand which of the two is the better footballer, as it's obviously Michael Carrick.
What are you questioning? That Beckham's past it or that LA Galaxy are a poor team?
That he regularly performs poorly.
The comparison with Michael Carrick is a gigantic joke, they are completely different players and in this United team Carrick would be 10 times more important.
But I think Beckham regular performs well over there; he doesn't move as much as he used to, but he was an important cog in the LA machine. They won the Supporters Shield in '10 and '11.
Couldn't harm our midfield now! Would bring the average age down a bit too!