MILLHILLMANC
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,023
did anyone here see pallister play??
did anyone here see pallister play??
did anyone here see pallister play??
Nesta is the best defender I've ever seen. Even as a crocked 30 something year old, he was able to take the ball off a high flying Messi.
He also got chopped in 2 like a turnip
He also got chopped in 2 like a turnip
Nesta was in no way more dominant physically than Rio. Rio was bigger faster stronger, tallerNot same game. Nesta spotted the danger & went to mark Ronaldinho but you had to ask where the midfield line was & wtf Gatusso was doing, not trying to rush back & block the wide area. It's a wonder strike right there. Not many times it would go in from that angle.
When the attacker is on that kind of level with too much space, even the best defender can't close the gap. Ronaldo hattrick was us & 2 goals, Rio couldn't catch him. Doesn't make Rio shite though.
Between Rio & Nesta, Nesta is more complete since he get tuck in & tackle more as well as more dominant physical & in the air while Rio is more behind in this area. Rio is more special since he can play his game without getting to dirty his jersey. I would say he edges Rio in ball playing too with less hoofball & more proper play making but less elegant. However, when it comes to rate player career, Rio was a better player since he could stay healthy & maintain his top level for a decent period of time while Nesta career was plagued with injuries which prevent him to keep his peak consistently enough. Nesta IMO was better player than Rio beside his peak though: breakthrough becoming key player of the team player; past peak period.
Nesta has bigger frame. Nesta is like blend between Vida & Rio; more balanced between strength & pace. Rio is kinda light for his height. Nesta contained prime physically Zlatan 1 vs 1 just fine. Rio couldn't contain Zlatan physically. In the game vs Inter, Rio to marked Zlatan when Zlatan dropped deep, however in set piece & in near box Vida had to step in.Nesta was in no way more dominant physically than Rio. Rio was bigger faster stronger, taller
Nesta has bigger frame. Nesta is like blend between Vida & Rio; more balanced between strength & pace. Rio is kinda light for his height. Nesta contained prime physically Zlatan 1 vs 1 just fine. Rio couldn't contain Zlatan physically. In the game vs Inter, Rio to marked Zlatan when Zlatan dropped deep, however in set piece & in near box Vida had to step in.
But not as strong as Nesta. Nesta is closer to Vida in term of physical power than Rio.Rio was lean but strong as hell.
Nesta has bigger frame. Nesta is like blend between Vida & Rio; more balanced between strength & pace. Rio is kinda light for his height. Nesta contained prime physically Zlatan 1 vs 1 just fine. Rio couldn't contain Zlatan physically. In the game vs Inter, Rio to marked Zlatan when Zlatan dropped deep, however in set piece & in near box Vida had to step in.
Are you moving the goal post? We're talking about physical power. Henry is not strong physically & played right into Ferdinand hand. Eto'o made a mug of Vida via skill & paace. Does that make Vida a weakling physically? Weird logic. I said Nesta dealt with Zlatan's physicality just fine 1 vs 1, just like Vida. Rio didn't fancy go physical with Zlatan. Rio was more ideally to deal with Zlatan's pace & trickery. Near & inside the box, it's Zlatan vs Vida for the obvious reason.Nesta was skinny as hell. Rio actually had lean muscle mass. I don't recall Zlatan posing us a threat. I am sure Zlatan has scored plenty vs Milan as well. I recall Ferdinand coping well vs Henry, Eto'o etc where as Henry made a mug of Nesta.
OnceHenry made a mug of Nesta.
Nesta wasn't skinny, the guy was a tank.
Are you moving the goal post? We're talking about physical power. Henry is not strong physically & played right into Ferdinand hand. Eto'o made a mug of Vida via skill & paace. Does that make Vida a weakling physically? Weird logic. I said Nesta dealt with Zlatan's physicality just fine 1 vs 1, just like Vida. Rio didn't fancy go physical with Zlatan. Rio was more ideally to deal with Zlatan's pace & trickery. Near & inside the box, it's Zlatan vs Vida for the obvious reason.
Nesta skinny is laughable. Everyone knows Rio is lean & strong. Zlatan was their best players in that tie. He's tightly marked but still able to break free at time & did have space & chance to cause us some trouble. We're simply better players.
He should definitely have won more England caps than he did.Yeah great player maybe a bit underrated among United fans at times. Don't think he was at Rio's level, but on his day there were few better defenders in Engkand than Pally.
No, not a single one of us!did anyone here see pallister play??
Not really, and Zlatan was/is as big and strong as DrogbaRio dealt with beasts like Drogba, why would he not fancy Zlatan?
Good debate this, and there's never a definitive answer as who was better than who. Pallister and Bruce deserve mentions along side Rio and Vida btw
Henry is good at shielding the ball, but there is a reason he's not used as traditional holding up play focal point. The physical strength we're talking about here is dominate & tip off balance the opponent. His play style is to play with the feet & wide range of movement so that the CB couldn't follow him. He was not as effective in Europe or international tournament since teams tend to sit deeper & stay more compact in the central area. Arsenal was a fast transitioning side back in the day. When the opponent played the right way, they lack a traditional no 9 inside the box. There is only as much you do from wide area against deep sitting team with opponent defenders comfortable deal with any ball going into the box. If you look close enough, when it comes to scrappy physical play, Henry still got his pushed away by defenders.Sorry but I don't recall this rendition of the game. perhaps you'd like to share some highlights. You seem to have been privy to United tactics, bear in mind this was 10 years ago. You also made the mistake in saying Henry is not strong physically. That is laughable. When did Thierry get pushed off the ball in England? you do recall Henry is a legend in the Premier league, a league with the most physically imposing CB's around. It is well known that our players are bigger and stronger than those across the continent. Henry made a mockery of them and was never outstrengthed lol. Rio dealt with beasts like Drogba, why would he not fancy Zlatan?
Not really, and Zlatan was/is as big and strong as Drogba
That's wrong. He is very good. Just that his aerial ability can be rivaled by opposition players while there were few forwards that stronger & could dominate him physically. Fortunately, we had Vida (had weakness with pace) who could compliment Rio's well & as defensive unit we're top class.I thought he wasn't good aerially. World class otherwise.
Rio was amazing, world class but we wouldn't be having this discussion if Stan stayed at united longer.
If rio was a rock then Jaap was a mountain
Stam was a great defender. Him and Rio in the same backline would have been awesome. One of the best potential partnership in the early 00's that could've brought even more success.Rio was amazing, world class but we wouldn't be having this discussion if Stam stayed at united longer.
If rio was a rock then Jaap was a mountain
Bruce and Pallister were the best in their day by a mile and monsters at clearing crosses and got stuck into 50/50 challenges far more than defenders like Rio, Terry and Carvalho but possibly fitness wise and pace wise and technical ability wise they may have been a tiny bit lower than the very elite center-backs similar to the likes of Hyppia, Keown.
Agreed, I think Stam pips them both. Rio well ahead of his time in the PL given only now are we seeing lots more clubs try to find the 'ball playing' CBs.Rio was better than Vidic IMO but Stam was still the best in club history. He was Rio and Vidic in one.
Rio was amazing, world class but we wouldn't be having this discussion if Stam stayed at united longer.
If rio was a rock then Jaap was a mountain
Probably has more to do with the later back problem Rio. Vida was absolutely immense and in beast form precisely when we most needed him to be.I could have sworn I saw a comparison in points won and the difference was pretty stark, but perhaps I'm way off base. Thanks for the clarification though, it's entirely possible I'm just remembering some highlight matches!
Heinze was a very good defender but provided nothing offensively. Evra was signed to provide a different attacking dimension to the team. I agree he was a much better player than Heinze but as a pure defender Heinze was better. He could slot in comfortably at centre back and often picked up the opposition's best header at set pieces.