AdNani
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2014
- Messages
- 1,781
He was incredible, my favourite ever CB and certainly the best I’ve seen at United along with Stam. If he was on the market now he’d be over 100 million. And I would be delighted if we paid it
Fair points. They were such different defenders it's hard to truly compare them but if I had to say who's better my pick would be Rio overall but Vidic is of the same level. Kind of makes me sad Jones and Smalling was out partnership yesterday when not long ago we had what I felt was the clear 1st and 2nd best in the world a decade ago. There is no current defender close to their level currently. Only Godin of a few years back truly came close IMO.Ferdinand between 2006-2008 was the better player (and had the ultimately higher peak), Vidic was better from the 08-09 season until his injury. Vidic was also the better defender when it came to partnering with others. Ferdinand without an aggressive ball winner alongside him struggled, Vidic did well no matter who was with him.
Fantastic, always surprises me when people claim Vidic was better.
Very but his ability on the ball is really overrated imo. His final few seasons in particular had him hoofing it aimlessly more than Rojo.
Easily. Probably closer to 150m.He was incredible, my favourite ever CB and certainly the best I’ve seen at United along with Stam. If he was on the market now he’d be over 100 million. And I would be delighted if we paid it
Yep, Nesta of around 2002 (I might be a year or so off) is the only one that maybe beats Rio of 07/08.I’d have him as undoubtedly the best in the Premiership era and the second best centre back in Europe over the last 20 years (after Nesta).
Yep rios intelligence, positioning and ability to read the game was incredible. I wouldnt say rio struggled without being alongside an agressive ball winner but i much preferred vidic because of it.Ferdinand between 2006-2008 was the better player (and had the ultimately higher peak), Vidic was better from the 08-09 season until his injury. Vidic was also the better defender when it came to partnering with others. Ferdinand without an aggressive ball winner alongside him struggled, Vidic did well no matter who was with him.
Yep rios intelligence, positioning and ability to read the game was incredible. I wouldnt say rio struggled without being alongside an agressive ball winner but i much preferred vidic because of it.
It was ridiculous the amount of times defending a set piece and vidic was the one heading it away.
- He was weak in the air and got dominated by "traditional English centre forwards" both physically and in the air.
Exactly, they complemented each other perfectly and they were both great defenders, but the sum was greater than the whole of the parts.I don't get the point of the Vidic v Ferdinand comparisons. It was the way the combined that was so amazing. Even if one was better than the other, it's what they formed together that was the envy of the world at the time.
Fantastic, always surprises me when people claim Vidic was better.
I'm not going to write a long intro, I'm hoping a discussion will pick up naturally.
I just want to know how highly you (as a United fan) rate him. How highly opposition fans rate him, now.
I want to know the general opinion on him. I.e was he the best defender United ever had? Do Liverpool fans still think Sami Hyypia was better than him?
Your thoughts caftards.
Not an United fan, but I have to say that Rio was amongst the best in the world, and wasn't overhyped, he really was good, when you see Cahill and Smalling playing for England it is hard to not remember about Rio or Terry, even if you are not English.