Spielmacher
Full Member
Surely Januzaj counts too.
Assume so so added him in.Surely Januzaj counts too.
United obviously have no problem with it but nonetheless:
De Gea
Lindegaard
Fellaini
Herrera
Mata
Kagawa
Valencia
Nani
Van Persie
Hernandez
Vermijl
Anderson
Not sure if Henriquez and Anderson count as homegrown or not. Big list of home growns though.
Amos
Jones
Evans
Smalling
Rafael
Fletcher
Carrick
Cleverley
Young
Zaha
Rooney
Welbeck
Petrucci
Lingard
Home grown u21s too:
Johnstone
M Keane
Blackett
Shaw
Powell
Lawrence
Wilson
W Keane
Surely Januzaj counts too.
Was referring to @mufcwarm92. He didn't list JanuzajHe's only 19, don't have to be registered
It encourages 'human trafficking' of underage players. The thing Barca got transfer banned for 2 weeks or so earlier this year.That the likes of Fabregas are considered "home grown" is dumb. He was "grown" at Barca.
Fabregas counts.If I count correctly, Chelsea has fewer, only 3 (Cahill, Terry and Moses)
Non-homegrown players currently in their squad:
Caballero
Kompany
Demichelis
Zabaleta
Kolarov
Fernando
Sagna
Nasri
Negredo
Dzeko
Aguero
Garcia
Navas
Silva
Fernandinho
Toure
Jovetic
Nastasic
18 players so 1 too many but they'll let Garcia go I imagine while Jovetic and Nastasic look available too.
Has been said before.Fabregas counts.
Hadn't read that far but thanks for the heads up.Has been said before.
United obviously have no problem with it but nonetheless:
Not sure if Henriquez and Anderson count as homegrown or not. Big list of home growns though.
"The future", "The way forward", "The modern club", "Great for the game and for Manchester".Firstly, I find this approach to be pretty disgraceful but secondly how are they meeting the quota?
Non-homegrown players currently in their squad:
Caballero
Kompany
Demichelis
Zabaleta
Kolarov
Fernando
Sagna
Nasri
Negredo
Dzeko
Aguero
Garcia
Navas
Silva
Fernandinho
Toure
Jovetic
Nastasic
18 players so 1 too many but they'll let Garcia go I imagine while Jovetic and Nastasic look available too.
Yup that would be fine!@rcoobc So if I follow your post a team could theoretically have zero "home grown" players in their squad but it would limit their domestic squad size to just 17?
Now I know why Chelsea needed him!Fabregas counts.
@rcoobc So if I follow your post a team could theoretically have zero "home grown" players in their squad but it would limit their domestic squad size to just 17?
Home grown yes, but not sure if he counts as United's own product. He turned 19 in october 2004, he joined us in august that year, so don't believe he counts as an own product
Doesn't matter if he is our product or not.
Really can't see them letting Jovetic go, unless he is home sick. He has been injured throughout his entire time at City.
He was also one of the top talents in the world at Fiorentina before he joined.
If he can stay fit, he could become a top class player. Not sure how big of an 'if' that is about his fitness though. Definitely worth keeping surely.
Loved watching him in Italy. Was gutted when City got him.
Surely Januzaj counts too.
It encourages 'human trafficking' of underage players. The thing Barca got transfer banned for 2 weeks or so earlier this year.
If I count correctly, Chelsea has fewer, only 3 (Cahill, Terry and Moses)
Zouma is 19 so would not have to be registered would he?So Chelsea HAVE to get rid of 2 players, or not register them. My guess is that Van Ginkel will be loaned out and Mikel sold.
Zouma is 19 so would not have to be registered would he?
Courtois counts as homegrown doesn't he... Signed for Chelsea in 2011 and only 22 now
Zouma isn't of an age where he has to be registered. And I should imagine that Courtois has been in England for less than 200 days. He's been loaned out ever since his signing, so no, he's not homegrown.Zouma is 19 so would not have to be registered would he?
Courtois counts as homegrown doesn't he... Signed for Chelsea in 2011 and only 22 now
Zouma isn't of an age where he has to be registered. And I should imagine that Courtois has been in England for less than 200 days. He's been loaned out ever since his singing, so no, he's not homegrown.
That the likes of Fabregas are considered "home grown" is dumb. He was "grown" at Barca.
No, depends on if you give Barca all the credit for making him the player he is. I think Arsenal deserve their share of credit too. So I don't think it's stupid, but it should stay within the laws and UEFA rules re 'human trafficking'.Depends on if you think people stop growing at 16.
No, depends on if you give Barca all the credit for making him the player he is. I think Arsenal deserve their share of credit too. So I don't think it's stupid, but it should stay within the laws and UEFA rules re 'human trafficking'.
Agreed.No idea about the human trafficking element but I wouldn't give Barca the entire credit for making Fabregas the player he is today. The player is a product of the Premier League as far as I can see and can see why he is seen as "home grown".
Left Barcelona just after he turned 16. Spent a similar amount of time at both clubs.That the likes of Fabregas are considered "home grown" is dumb. He was "grown" at Barca.
Well surely he'd have been registered to Athletico when he played for them and since you can't be registered to two clubs at the same time then he's not gaining any days on his Chelsea registration. He's not home-grown, I'm sure of it.I don't think it matters, as long as he's registered in England.
Well surely he'd have been registered to Athletico when he played for them and since you can't be registered to two clubs at the same time then he's not gaining any days on his Chelsea registration. He's not home-grown, I'm sure of it.
Home grown yes, but not sure if he counts as United's own product. He turned 19 in october 2004, he joined us in august that year, so don't believe he counts as an own product