croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 39,104
Unsure how to add a poll so just gonna ask who people would prefer out of the two and why?
Reminds me of Torres.Hojlund reminded me of 19 year old Rooney.
Its best if we get these 2 together for the squad building. RKM is for all the points you mention and Hoijlun is the more classic 9 and finisher of the moves type.Kolo Muani, although would not be sad with Hojlund.
Kolo Muani because he is already a prototype of a Manchester United forward. He is similar to what Martial was like when he was good and has a style that would effortlessly merge with the football played by Rashford, Antony, Sancho and co. In terms of his level, I also think he is one move away from really exploding and I see a potential world class forward in him.
Hojland looks like a quality prospect too, a more classic 9 with great physical attributes and I’d gladly have him too.
Hojlund --- simply because we already have too many players at United that play in the same areas that Kolo (thats what his mates call him ) does. Hojlund is different. He plays more centrally and has pace to burn. Imagine a front line of Kolo, Nashers and Rashie...their pace will scare the feck out of any defenders.
Absolutely this although both + Sancho out to reduce bloat will be awesome.
Hojlund- good prospect but better fit. Not only is he cheaper, younger and stronger, he has as much pace, a quick first step, great stamina, hunger, and has a higher ceiling for development.
That said, his attributes as a player are better suited to what we’re looking for and need. While Muani appears to me a wide player that runs in behind defenders, Hojlund is more your archetypal striker- drifts center, closer to the 6 yd box, appears good in hold up, and looks to link up just as much, with good movement. I don’t know about his mentality, preparedness, and whether he lives and breathes movement and positioning, but that’s all part of his development curve.
More importantly, Hojlund is also more suitable in situations with compact defensive blocks and close lines where we have struggled to break through. Appears to me, based on highlights, he’s a player more suitable to out hustle a marking, or constantly moving in space. Don’t know how good he’s in the air.
It’s a shame we need a ready-made player like him now, but he’s certainly the skill set we need. How far he’ll be able to grow or even become that player is the million dollar question, but he’d be a good start.
If we're only adding one striker than I'd go with the one who has 46 goals in three seasons of top level football under their belt, rather than the guy with one season where he got 10.
It's the same one. 46 goals in 3 seasons, like I said. I don't know why you are being weird about this?Me too. Which one is that then? Kolo only has 36 over 3 seasons. His last season in france he only scored 12 despite playing over 1000 minutes more than Højlund.
15 last season in germany and he is 4 years older.
It's the same one. 46 goals in 3 seasons, like I said. I don't know why you are being weird about this?
Because he scored them? Have your stats only got the league goals and it's somehow not occurred to you that sometimes players play in more than one competition?Why are you adding 10 goals? Its only 36.
Never seen either of them play, like 90% of you haven’t
All I know is that if we sign one he’ll end up being shit and if we don’t end up signing one, he’ll be worth 5x as much by 2026
Good fecking morning bastards
But he’s also 4 years older. At Hojlunds age he was making almost no appearances for Nantes B and in his first proper season for Nantes in the French league he scored 10 in 40, whilst being a year older than Hojlund currently is. He’s arguably more ready right now but I would argue Hojlund has a much higher ceilingBecause he scored them? Have your stats only got the league goals and it's somehow not occurred to you that sometimes players play in more than one competition?
I don't dispute this. I am indeed arguing that he is more ready right now and I believe that's crucial unless we're signing someone more experienced as well.But he’s also 4 years older. At Hojlunds age he was making almost no appearances for Nantes B and in his first proper season for Nantes in the French league he scored 10 in 40, whilst being a year older than Hojlund currently is. He’s arguably more ready right now but I would argue Hojlund has a much higher ceiling
Kolo. Because I like the name Randall