Frank Grimes
Full Member
I'm worse. I have him at 5.5.
It's around that level anyway. Don't like to say it but he is a major disappointment and I don't think he has the drive to change.
I'm worse. I have him at 5.5.
Compared to rest of the team he was pretty much average. We didn't play well anywhere so I'm not going to single him out as being any worse.
Bit he's supposed to be a top player in his prime. Marital, Lukaku, Rashford are guys still developing. Young we know isn't good enough and has gone beyond his peak as a winger anyway.
For Mkhi there are no excuses. He's one of the few that ticks the boxes of ability and experience. We need him to show up if we want to win the league.
You think we paid 75m for Lukaku to develop him? He was brought here to score from day one.
For me it's no coincidence Miki dropped off when Pogba got injured. He's a player that needs space to run into. With Pogba out there is little creative spark from Matic/Herrera/Fellaini so well drilled opponents can focus everything on shutting Miki down. When Pogba plays he is priority #1 and Miki is left with much more space.
So it is the other players fault that he can't even keep hold of the ball and looses it very time someone barely touches him? He offered nothing in attack or in defence yesterday. We would have been more effective with Lingard starting ahead of him.You think we paid 75m for Lukaku to develop him? He was brought here to score from day one.
For me it's no coincidence Miki dropped off when Pogba got injured. He's a player that needs space to run into. With Pogba out there is little creative spark from Matic/Herrera/Fellaini so well drilled opponents can focus everything on shutting Miki down. When Pogba plays he is priority #1 and Miki is left with much more space.
So it is the other players fault that he can't even keep hold of the ball and looses it very time someone barely touches him? He offered nothing in attack or in defence yesterday. We would have been more effective with Lingard starting ahead of him.
It's not his fault when the whole team plays poorly. None of our attackers offered anything, including Lingard when he came on. Miki is just the current fashionable one to moan about.
You didn't answer his question.
Also again comparing him to a player like Lingard. We all know Lingard is barely good enough to ge a squad player. He isn't the yardstick to judge a player like Mkhitaryan. A guy who was signed to elevate us to another level.
I disagree, Ozil even at his worst is still able to receive the ball and keep the ball. Why Ozil is called a big game bottler is, he does not influence those big matches like he does against smaller teams, his through passes and dribbles and all those fancy touches are nowhere to be seen. Ozil is twice the player he is.He reminds me of Mezut Ozil.
Was he? He was signed to be one of our starting players, but to take us to another level? I'm not sure about that.
He didn't play well but he was no worse than those around him who arent being singled out.
He should really be dropped at this stage but who do you drop him for?
He should really be dropped at this stage but who do you drop him for?
Forget Griezmann because he doesn't solve our immediate problems at least until the winter window just play Mata in the 10 role for now and we will see immediate improvements because Mata doesn't lose the ball as often whilst he can create and score goals. Makes me made that we allowed Pereira to go on loan when he could have taken this coward's place in the side.Getting in Griezmann to replace Mhki is an absolute priority. I would even try in January and sod the CL cuptied status because come next Summer he will be very much in demand.
Forget Griezmann because he doesn't solve our immediate problems at least until the winter window just play Mata in the 10 role for now and we will see immediate improvements because Mata doesn't lose the ball as often whilst he can create and score goals. Makes me made that we allowed Pereira to go on loan when he could have taken this coward's place in the side.
I doubt if Pereira would have been trusted yesterday. Who would Jose have him replace?Could be argued, Pereira was cowardly in not staying and fighting for his place? You are absolutely and fundamentally wrong as it's bravery in taking risks dribbling and trying to make the passes that are more risky than playing safe. Also it's it those players that dribbling the most are the most likely to be fouled or injured. Given that's Mikki's game, can hardly call him a coward?
I doubt if Pereira would have been trusted yesterday. Who would Jose have him replace?
I think Pereira felt discouraged by the lack of opportunities when the season began and he was wrong in insisting on a loan move but I feel that in Herrera and Mkhitaryan we have players that Pereira could challenge for minutes in a midfield two or three. However given Mourinho's natural inclination to trust older players you can understand his decision.Could be argued, Pereira was cowardly in not staying and fighting for his place? You are absolutely and fundamentally wrong as it's bravery in taking risks dribbling and trying to make the passes that are more risky than playing safe. Also it's it those players that dribbling the most are the most likely to be fouled or injured. Given that's Mikki's game, can hardly call him a coward?
Would love to see Pereira at 10, he is pretty press resistant and would have helped keep the ball much better. Perhaps Mata as 10 and Lingard or Rashford on the right for now?Forget Griezmann because he doesn't solve our immediate problems at least until the winter window just play Mata in the 10 role for now and we will see immediate improvements because Mata doesn't lose the ball as often whilst he can create and score goals. Makes me made that we allowed Pereira to go on loan when he could have taken this coward's place in the side.
I think Pereira felt discouraged by the lack of opportunities when the season began and he was wrong in insisting on a loan move but I feel that in Herrera and Mkhitaryan we have players that Pereira could challenge for minutes in a midfield two or three. However given Mourinho's natural inclination to trust older players you can understand his decision.
Regarding the demands of Mkhi's position its understandable if he loses the ball oftenly but this guy can't even get the basic pass right and loses the ball almost every time he is challenged, compare with other similar players who play his role in the league with the same creative brief and tell me if they lose the ball as often.
I think his biggest problem seems to be his ball-control. He has talent, no doubt, but his touch isn't that great.
The next stage for United is to upgrade guys like him.
Imagine the difference if we simply swapped him with De Bruyne!
Disagree. His biggest weaknesses, imo, are his decision making and his inability to work tight spaces. Too many times he's been guilty of trying to run the ball rather than play passes. He also doesn't seem to know how to turn his body and use feints to shield the ball.
I'd say his biggest weakness if his weakness on the ball and how easy it is beat him physically.Disagree. His biggest weaknesses, imo, are his decision making and his inability to work tight spaces. Too many times he's been guilty of trying to run the ball rather than play passes. He also doesn't seem to know how to turn his body and use feints to shield the ball.