MyOnlySolskjaer
Creator of Player Performance threads
Remember when Arsenal wanted him in exchange for Alexis Sanchez?
Think the best part was Anthony Martial was “absolutely not” interested in moving to Arsenal.
Remember when Arsenal wanted him in exchange for Alexis Sanchez?
All debatable, also just because Kane did well in last few seasons doesn't mean Martial shouldn't be compared. Martial is having better season, there is nothing wrong in saying that, doesn't mean he is better player.
The guy sticking up for Kane must be either Jose in disguise or Kane himself.
Martial looks like a completely different player from the start of the season.
Does he though? I personally think he's just getting the ball more and is perhaps higher in confidence. Seeing Lingard come on yesterday reminded me of how awful we were at creating anything at the start of the season. He's downright terrible.
He is only having a better season because Kane has been crocked and unfit - I don't think any of those observations are debatable at all if I'm honest as it is clear what Kane's strengths are in the same way it's clear what Martial's are - they are different types of strikers but Kane is capable of a lot more than just scoring lots of goals, I'm not sure Martial has the same ability Kane does. We will never agree on this of course.
Nobody outside of Manchester united would pick Martial over Kane.
QuestionableKane is also stronger,
Not a chance is he better than Martial at passinga much better passer,
Again not a chance Kane has better vision.has better vision
Questionable
Not a chance is he better than Martial at passing
Again not a chance Kane has better vision.
Kane does have better hold up play and a better eye for a goal. They aren’t really comparable. The way we play Martial suits us fine. He’s had a great season all things considered. out with injury. Lingard and Perreria to deal with doesn’t take our penalties so personally I wouldn’t want Kane and not because I don’t think he’s a good player he’s just not the type of player that would fit in with what we are doing. Martial is a linch pin in the attack. His better passing and vision accompanied with his explosive power and pace is doing the buisness for us. Long may it continue and next year he has over 20 goals and a butt load of assists in the league.
Nobody outside of Manchester united would pick Martial over Kane.
Martial was creating more chances than Eden Hazard and people going to try and say Kane has better vision than Martial. Come away man.I couldn't disagree with this more strongly - but there is no point in discussing it because we will never agree.
We need some neutrals in here to judge it for us.
Not yet, but the gap between them is perhaps not as wide as you might think.
Martial has progressed this season while Kane has at best stagnated. I also think Martial is far better suited to Ole's system than Kane ever would be, which is why I can't understand the United fans advocating United making a move for him this summer.
No need to apologise. Because you're not being pendantic. You're just being wrong.Sorry to be pedantic but I have to say creativity has never been an issue in his game. Always been one of the most creative players in our team since the moment he joined.
Kane has made more than double the amount of through balls than Martial this season and only 1 less than David Silva.Martial was creating more chances than Eden Hazard and people going to try and say Kane has better vision than Martial. Come away man.
Martial has a lot to prove before he should be compared to Kane. Right now it's frankly ridiculous to do it and even more ridiculous to claim Martial is better. We can talk again in a year or two about it to see if Martial becomes the player you believe he is.
Think the best part was Anthony Martial was “absolutely not” interested in moving to Arsenal.
Fair enough. Im willing to accept that.I never said Martial was better, quite the opposite, in fact.
I merely said the gap between them isn't as wide as you might think.
Martial has a lot to prove before he should be compared to Kane. Right now it's frankly ridiculous to do it and even more ridiculous to claim Martial is better. We can talk again in a year or two about it to see if Martial becomes the player you believe he is.
Remember when Arsenal wanted him in exchange for Alexis Sanchez?
Thank god for Woodward. Whenever he's actually stepped in and done something, it's generally been for the better.
If it was down to our fanbase we'd have swapped him for the likes of Willian and Perisic
Be careful, Jose might be planning something similar with Alli.That would have made one of the worst deals in history about 10 times worse.
Wish I could like your post, it deserves it.Football is a team game with all the different dynamics that encompass it.
One of the key dynamics is team harmony.
Straight off question,
who would you take over Ruud Van Nistelrooy vs Harry Kane ?
Yes its a trick question, however good either them was/is we all know what happened to Ruud ..........
The Anthony Martial we are seeing under Ole is perfect for our team, Ole understands what it is to be a striker and he understands what it is to be a human being.
He is getting the best out of Anthony and he is handling the team harmony perfectly.
There is absolutely no reason to bring in a striker like Harry Kane at the risk of disrupting team harmony, he is not the type of striker you would bring in.
Anthony is at the perfect age to cement himself as one of the best number 9s around, why do some want to risk disrupting this seeing that Anthony has responded perfectly to Ole ??
Id love to see his running statistics in the last 20 games.
The only reason I can see is so that there is competition for his place, which I do agree, but Harry Kane is not that person, we need a fluid striker for that but I hope we can tie down Ighalo on a permanent deal as we need a permenant backup #9 not one to replace Anthony ......
Be careful, Jose might be planning something similar with Alli.
This is laughably untrue.Nobody outside of Manchester united would pick Martial over Kane.
you must be on a serious windup to even think Kane is a better passer or has better vision. he also can’t holdup better than martial. Stop it!I get that you guys support and love your own player but let's not compare Kane with Martial. There is no comparison even if Martial has posted slightly better stats in a season when Kane has missed 16 matches through injury and has clearly been not fully fit for many of the games as he recovered. If Martial scores over 20 goals in the next two seasons then we can start to compare the two. Kane has done that for 6 seasons in a row and there is only two years between them. Kane is also stronger, a much better passer, has better vision and much better at holding up the ball than Martial is. Martial is quicker and more explosive.
isnt it hilarious how
you must be on a serious windup to even think Kane is a better passer or has better vision. he also can’t holdup better than martial. Stop it!
Only think Kane is superior in to martial is aerial ability and shooting. Those two are very important for a CF to be fair.
I watch Kane very well and yet I still wouldn’t say he has better holdup play or better passing than martial. I never said he couldn’t hold up the ball well you just took it as an offense that I would suggest martial is simply better at it. Learn the game.When you talk like that all I can think is that you don't watch Kane play very often. His passing and vision are absolutely fantastic for a striker. His only weakness is a lack of pace - his all round game is extremely strong. For you to say he can't hold up a ball better than Martial is, I'm sorry to say, laughable.
I watch Kane very well and yet I still wouldn’t say he has better holdup play or better passing than martial. I never said he couldn’t hold up the ball well you just took it as an offense that I would suggest martial is simply better at it. Learn the game.
I think Kane has 18 assists in 205 PL appearances for Spurs, whereas Martial has 21 assists in 143 appearances for United. Fairly similar stats, if not slightly better for Martial. I think that if you want to argue that Kane is a much better passer and has much better vision than Martial, you would therefore also have to argue that Spurs have had worse finishers over the last few years than United and also that Kane assists the assister much more so than Martial. From the biased perspective of a United fan, I wouldn't be inclined to believe that either of those two things are true, and would be more of the opinion that you can't clearly state that one of these players has been clearly better than the other in terms of creation.I get that you guys support and love your own player but let's not compare Kane with Martial. There is no comparison even if Martial has posted slightly better stats in a season when Kane has missed 16 matches through injury and has clearly been not fully fit for many of the games as he recovered. If Martial scores over 20 goals in the next two seasons then we can start to compare the two. Kane has done that for 6 seasons in a row and there is only two years between them. Kane is also stronger, a much better passer, has better vision and much better at holding up the ball than Martial is. Martial is quicker and more explosive.
I think Kane has 18 assists in 205 PL appearances for Spurs, whereas Martial has 21 assists in 143 appearances for United. Fairly similar stats, if not slightly better for Martial. I think that if you want to argue that Kane is a much better passer and has much better vision than Martial, you would therefore also have to argue that Spurs have had worse finishers over the last few years than United and also that Kane assists the assister much more so than Martial. From the biased perspective of a United fan, I wouldn't be inclined to believe that either of those two things are true, and would be more of the opinion that you can't clearly state that one of these players has been clearly better than the other in terms of creation.
https://fbref.com/en/players/21a66f6a/dom_lg/Harry-Kane-Domestic-League-Stats
https://fbref.com/en/players/8b788c01/dom_lg/Anthony-Martial-Domestic-League-Stats
I think Kane has 18 assists in 205 PL appearances for Spurs, whereas Martial has 21 assists in 143 appearances for United. Fairly similar stats, if not slightly better for Martial. I think that if you want to argue that Kane is a much better passer and has much better vision than Martial, you would therefore also have to argue that Spurs have had worse finishers over the last few years than United and also that Kane assists the assister much more so than Martial. From the biased perspective of a United fan, I wouldn't be inclined to believe that either of those two things are true, and would be more of the opinion that you can't clearly state that one of these players has been clearly better than the other in terms of creation.
https://fbref.com/en/players/21a66f6a/dom_lg/Harry-Kane-Domestic-League-Stats
https://fbref.com/en/players/8b788c01/dom_lg/Anthony-Martial-Domestic-League-Stats
How is that even remotely similar stats? Martial has 3 more assists in 62 less games.
A winger should assist more than a striker playing up front on his own wouldn't you think?
How is that even remotely similar stats? Martial has 3 more assists in 62 less games.