MalcolmTucker
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,818
Before the restart and Kanes injury, he had 17 goals in 25 games. Martial was on 16 in 35 games. Since the restart, Kanes got 4 in 7 games, Martials on 6 in 7 games. So even if you look at the whole of the season, Kanes stats were a lot better and only marginally less now. Not looked at Aubama's numbers but wouldn't be far off either.
Saying that though, im not disagreeing that Martial should be our top striker next year. The money it would cost to bring in Kane for not a huge improvement, plus Kane's older, so it wouldn't make sense.
In regards to the 'Martials first season as a striker' point. It still doesn't take away from the fact Kane and Auba have don't it for many season. Martial COULD go on to do the same but the other two have done it and are proven. I understand we should support our players but If Spurs offered a straight swap this summer with Kane/Martial, you're telling me you wouldn't take it?
Nope. Kane is a great player but he tactically doesn't fit our fluid and dynamic front three. Also Martial and Rashford have great chemistry and understanding which I wouldn't want to disrupt.
But most of all, Martial has the potential to be more than what Kane, whom is at his peak, is. Martial has far more strings to his bow and is a genuinely exciting young footballer who is entering his peak and experiencing that development is what being a United fan is about. Kane is just an excellent striker with great fundamentals, who is also injury prone - he doesn't have the magic that Martial has.
Martial is already set to outscore Kane this season and would you be surprised if Martial outscores Kane next season? So why would you take Kane in a straight swap?
Last edited: