Has Maguire/Murtough fecked our chances up/made it harder for top 5?

Blaming this on Maguire is idiotic. Maguire is doing what is best for him and his family by holding his employer to their contract obligations. Rightfully so. If the manager does not want him, it's up to him to convince Murtough to sell at a loss by paying Maguire what he would have made if he stays. That will come out of any amount we would get for him from the buying club. Not ideal, but it solves the immediate problem. Also, last I checked, the players that started the match on Monday would have started regardless of whether Amrabat or Pavard were in the squad. Hojlund is injured so nothing could have been done about him starting except maybe bringing him in sooner and, he could have still been injured training with United.
Awwwww
 
Annoys me when people go on about players being on ridiculous wages which is why they won’t move to another club. Even when they move club they’ll still be on thousands a week and getting more game time. They need to take a look at them selves and think about people that do 12 hour shifts or people that work for minimum wage and struggle to get by. Pure greed in football and I think they should put a cap on wages and stuff and give bonuses due to performances… maybe we’ll see decent games then.

:lol: I'm not sure where or why people on 12 hour shifts comes into whether Harry Maguire wants to play for West Ham or not.

Woodward made a habit of overpaying players and then running their contracts down because the wages made them impossible to sell. We're still paying for it now with De Gea leaving for free when any competent club would have got a half decent fee for him, and now Maguire not wanting to take a big pay cut to play for a lower mid table team.

It annoys me when people just ignorantly put stuff like this down to greed on the part of the players, when in most cases they are just making decisions about their own future that are perfectly rational and which they have every right to make.

I'm sure if it was you in that position you wouldn't hesitate to take a massive pay cut to move from Man Utd to West Ham when it's entirely your own choice, because otherwise what about all the people on 12 hour shifts, or something.
 
Much as I despise the spineless and unambitious former captain, he's not the main issue.

DvB, Henderson, McT, Bailly, Williams. Could have sold all of those for money to get the midfielder and CB in.

Then Maguire would have finally played his best position as starting CB for the U21s
 
:lol: I'm not sure where or why people on 12 hour shifts comes into whether Harry Maguire wants to play for West Ham or not.

Woodward made a habit of overpaying players and then running their contracts down because the wages made them impossible to sell. We're still paying for it now with De Gea leaving for free when any competent club would have got a half decent fee for him, and now Maguire not wanting to take a big pay cut to play for a lower mid table team.

It annoys me when people just ignorantly put stuff like this down to greed on the part of the players, when in most cases they are just making decisions about their own future that are perfectly rational and which they have every right to make.

I'm sure if it was you in that position you wouldn't hesitate to take a massive pay cut to move from Man Utd to West Ham when it's entirely your own choice, because otherwise what about all the people on 12 hour shifts, or something.
Ha! Yeah. He works in the football industry not the 12 hour shift industry. He wants a salary commensurate with his financial goals and needs that are appropriate for footballers, not shift workers.
 
Any regular player could do this. Doesnt take 80m to be just available and not perform. He has underperformed big time, there’s no other way around it.
That's not what being greedy means.
 
Murtough signs 3 players in 1 month and now it’s all gone to shit because he can’t forcefully remove Maguire from the club. :lol: :lol: :lol:

This place things the world’s gone to shit because they can’t sign a shiny new toy. fecking never change CAF. Those 3 signings weren’t good enough! We want MORE & if they’re not good enough in their first game we want EVEN MORE!!
 
Well the reports are that further midfield sales are required before a new midfielder can be brought in. Any money from Maguire's sale would be needed to get a replacement for him and I doubt a back up CB would make the difference.

But this has to be a joke thread, right?
I stubbed my toe earlier. Maybe that was Maguire’s fault too?
 
Our lack of selling when we need to sell will hurt us in general. This team needed to be rebuilt when ETH came in and so far they've done a solid job at that (please put down your pitchforks). Getting rid of Maguire and McT would benefit us greatly though. Getting a young CB in like Todibo would be great when you keep Varane's age in mind and the Onana (Everton midfielder) rumors had me pretty excited, once again a young player with a profile that would suit our needs. I don't think missing out on these deals both in- and outgoing will cost us top 4-5 this year, but it sure is frustrating when Liverpool revamp their entire midfield in 1 summer and Chelsea completely overhauls their entire team in 1 year. Both aiming at building for the future as well. I miss the days when we always had a young successor at the ready, but nowadays we rarely do.
 
If we're struggling to finish in the Champions League places this season, it will be due to other failings in the squad. The lack of goals in the team and the general state of the midfield are far more concerning to me than if Maguire does or doesn't stick around, although I would definitely prefer him gone.

Maguire started 8 league games for us last season and it might be fewer than that this season. If that's the case Maguire's involvement shouldn't really make a material difference if the rest of the team is functioning as it should.
 
Looking back to last week when we were moving on Maguire and Pavard and especially Amrabat were coming in, to now where its looking bleak. Maguires greediness and Murtough not pushing him and McTom for £60 mill to West Ham, could have seen us swapping those two with much better players.
After the Wanderers game and the way they just ran through the centre midfield, shows we need reinforcements in that area badly.
If we play like we did last week we will lose more than we win. Do you see any light at the end of the tunnel? Will Mainoo and Gore have to step up, with no real proof they can, apart from a couple of pre season games?
Glazers and Woodward fecked us.
 
If we're struggling to finish in the Champions League places this season, it will be due to other failings in the squad. The lack of goals in the team and the general state of the midfield are far more concerning to me than if Maguire does or doesn't stick around, although I would definitely prefer him gone.

Maguire started 8 league games for us last season and it might be fewer than that this season. If that's the case Maguire's involvement shouldn't really make a material difference if the rest of the team is functioning as it should.
But we need the money from the sale of Maguire to buy a midfielder. So it will be due to him.
 
Maguire sale has nothing to do with signing Mount and Hojlund for almost 150m

Yeah the trouble was Erik never saw getting a partner/backup for Casemiro as essential. Mount was always a high priority and IF there was something left afterwards then go for Amrabat.
 
Maguire is 5th choice and unlikely to play many games so he shouldn’t have much of an impact. We would also have at best been breaking even on FFP terms on his transfer as well.

The biggest mistake is not selling Mctominay, can debate all day about how good/bad he is but anything he contributes on the pitch is insignificant compared to benefit of his fee being pure profit. Not selling Henderson compounds that as well.

Totally nailed it with second paragraph
 
This is an important point - we can't just cry every time we don't sign a player. Chelsea have gone a bit mental with spending but otherwise we're up there (as usual) and it's on us to improve.

And tbf despite everyone going crazy about Chelsea I still look at their forwards and can't see how they score enough goals to do anything this season. Not now we know the extent of Nkunku's injury.
 
But we need the money from the sale of Maguire to buy a midfielder. So it will be due to him.
I don't think that's true. The money generated from the Maguire sale likely would've gone on one of Pavard or Todibo. It's the lack of movement on the likes of Henderson and McTominay that's impeding our ability to sign a midfielder.
 
I don't think that's true. The money generated from the Maguire sale likely would've gone on one of Pavard or Todibo. It's the lack of movement on the likes of Henderson and McTominay that's impeding our ability to sign a midfielder.

Failure to sell McTominay & Donny has impeded our ability to sign another midfielder
 
I don't think that's true. The money generated from the Maguire sale likely would've gone on one of Pavard or Todibo. It's the lack of movement on the likes of Henderson and McTominay that's impeding our ability to sign a midfielder.

Yes, methinks we won’t let Maguire go without getting in a 3rd/4th CB candidate, it will cost what we get for him or there abouts.
 
Yes, methinks we won’t let Maguire go without getting in a 3rd/4th CB candidate, it will cost what we get for him or there abouts.

Todibo makes sense as Varane can mentor,on the other hand maybe Erik is prepared to wait for more options next summer
 
Jonah.

mistake not to pay him off when we were offered £30m. That’s a £20m profit unless I’m missing something?
 
Ha! Yeah. He works in the football industry not the 12 hour shift industry. He wants a salary commensurate with his financial goals and needs that are appropriate for footballers, not shift workers.
Around 270 million people played football last year world wide, only 557 of them are apparently good enough to play in the PL, that's something like 0.002% - I've I was in that % of capability of any profession I'd want to earn a lot!
 
Absolutely. We are still going to play tons of games and the likes of Varane and Casemiro are not capable of playing two games a week for prolonged periods of times and if our backups include the likes of Maguire or McTominay we are in trouble and it's not like out first team is playing well either and that's even more worrying.

Like if we could bring in Amrabat, Pavard and another forward our depth looks a lot better than what it does now but it's not likely to happen now.
 
Please see;
Just thinking if it were someone else like Martial doing the same thing, would the forum be so magnanimous in defending him with the same reasons?

Of course, Mag is fully entitled to his contract and is technically doing nothing wrong.

Can’t help but think that some who are defending Maguire will be a lot nastier towards other players if a similar situation plays out
 
Absolutely. We are still going to play tons of games and the likes of Varane and Casemiro are not capable of playing two games a week for prolonged periods of times and if our backups include the likes of Maguire or McTominay we are in trouble and it's not like out first team is playing well either and that's even more worrying.

Like if we could bring in Amrabat, Pavard and another forward our depth looks a lot better than what it does now but it's not likely to happen now.

Yeah needs us to find compromise for Maguire (unlikely) sell McTominay (slim possibility) and get taker for Martial (no chance) to make all those happen
 
Just thinking if it were someone else like Martial doing the same thing, would the forum be so magnanimous in defending him with the same reasons?

Of course, Mag is fully entitled to his contract and is technically doing nothing wrong.

Can’t help but think that some who are defending Maguire will be a lot nastier towards other players if a similar situation plays out
Maguire is comfortably our most hated player on here.

I'd 'defend' any other player doing the same because it's exactly I would do.

The fact that we can't now afford a back up midfielder or defender is the effect of years of mismanagement of the club. It has been coming. Boiling our chances of success down to a player 'refusing to leave' for £30m this summer is ridiculous.
 
If things go horribly wrong it'll be on ETH and no one else really. Unless people think it was the club not ETH who chose to spend the resources on Mount and Hojlund.
 
Absolutely. We are still going to play tons of games and the likes of Varane and Casemiro are not capable of playing two games a week for prolonged periods of times and if our backups include the likes of Maguire or McTominay we are in trouble and it's not like out first team is playing well either and that's even more worrying.

Like if we could bring in Amrabat, Pavard and another forward our depth looks a lot better than what it does now but it's not likely to happen now.
You make out like Maguire and McTominay can't play football.

Both International players who have had several brilliant games for us.

Not guaranteed that Pavard and Amrabat step in and perform brilliantly.
 
That's not what being greedy means.

Well no one mentioned greed, just that we spend 80m on a player, who has performed like a 15m player who still cash in enormuosly without being even close to do his part of the contract and perform to a decent standard.
 
Well no one mentioned greed, just that we spend 80m on a player, who has performed like a 15m player who still cash in enormuosly without being even close to do his part of the contract and perform to a decent standard.
I'm pretty sure that there isn't a footballer's contract out there that specifies that they must perform to a "decent" standard criteria that is set by a fan's perception
 
Well no one mentioned greed, just that we spend 80m on a player, who has performed like a 15m player who still cash in enormuosly without being even close to do his part of the contract and perform to a decent standard.
I think you need to go back and read.
 
Just thinking if it were someone else like Martial doing the same thing, would the forum be so magnanimous in defending him with the same reasons?

Of course, Mag is fully entitled to his contract and is technically doing nothing wrong.

Can’t help but think that some who are defending Maguire will be a lot nastier towards other players if a similar situation plays out
This is nonsense, players have a right to their contracts if they're fulfilling the terms of their contracts. The nationality/race or whatever you're edging towards doesn't come into it. Martial shouldn't have to take a pay cut if he doesn't want to either.
 
You can realistically blame a lot of people.

The Glazers, Woodward and Ole for buying terribly, Murtough for make strange decisions on sales, Maguire for scuppering the West Ham move.

Personally Maguire is pretty low on the list.
 
Playing Devils advocate; if anyone in here was playing for City/Liverpool/Arsenal even at the level Maguire is, would you leave for a lesser named club and forfeit your salary for a lower one, without a good payoff? We dont really know the ins and outs of why he didnt leave for West Ham, but if it was over money you really cant blame him. Hes coming to the end of his career and will want to earn as much as he can.

Personally from a Utd fan perspective obviously I want him gone asap. I wouldnt be surprised jf he isnt one of the leakers. He always has a lot to say around international breaks.
 
Playing Devils advocate; if anyone in here was playing for City/Liverpool/Arsenal even at the level Maguire is, would you leave for a lesser named club and forfeit your salary for a lower one, without a good payoff? We dont really know the ins and outs of why he didnt leave for West Ham, but if it was over money you really cant blame him. Hes coming to the end of his career and will want to earn as much as he can.
He can't have it both ways. He stayed for the money so can't now complain about playing time. If he wanted playing time he should've gone.
 
He can't have it both ways. He stayed for the money so can't now complain about playing time. If he wanted playing time he should've gone.

Well he can have it both ways because if Varane is injured he will be playing for Man Utd, and he has said he wants to earn his place back, not that he thinks he is entitled to play.

Also, his choices were stay at United or move to West Ham + massive pay cut. There's some very deliberate ignorance in pretending not wanting to move from Man Utd to West Ham is a purely financial decision. The pay cut part is just a big kick in the teeth to go with it, and I think most rational footballers (or people in general) would be turning that down without too much of a thought. It would only make any sense if HE was the one who decided he wanted the move in the first place.

People are trying to project the club's poor transfer and contract management under Woodward onto Maguire. The reality is the mistake was made years ago, and if it wasn't a mistake that Woodward made probably 10x over with other players/signings, it wouldn't actually be causing a problem, because we'd have already recouped or not spent much needed transfer/wage bill funds with Pogba, De Gea, Sancho, Ronaldo, etc.

For a club that is servicing debt and has a limited transfer pot, we have wasted an extraordinary amount of money on overpaying for players and paying them too much to be able to sell them. Our management of that aspect of the club under Woodward makes most government departments look financially efficient by comparison.