What.. Lindelof fails to win the ball and it's like two, maybe three passes before the ball is in the back of the net? It's not a lot of steps and this was a counter attack directly caused by Lindelof's inability to win the ball against pretty much any attacker. I want us to play this way, it's just that we can not do it with Lindelof. It simply doesn't work with him. He always backs off which means the whole team needs to run back quite a lot to defend. He backs off because if he tries to win the ball then this happens. We don't get to play this way with Lindelof as it will leave our team exposed defensively every time Lindelof loses a physical battle. This extends a tremendous amount of pressure on to our midfielders who have to act as defensive, quick recovery players. We give up a lot of possession in different ways to accompany his weaknesses.
You are completely right that he is supposed to be in that position IF he is going to win the ball, but in such a situation either you win the ball or you make a free kick. Whatever you do, you do not turn your back against your man if you lose control of the ball. He also totally should have ran back on full speed to get back into a CB position during a counter attack. I mean he ran back but he didn't know where he was supposed to run or the extent of how important such a run very well could be, because then he would have reached his man in time. At least make enough contact with the player to stop his forward passing options.
It's not sometimes though with Lindelof. He can't play in a high line because he lacks aggressiveness, pace, strength and aerial dominance. He also doesn't time his headers and misreads the flight of the ball too much for my liking. How you want us to use a defender that doesn't know how to contest for a ball in an aggressive manner, playing a high line next to Maguire.. I just don't know