A-man
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2017
- Messages
- 6,488
I agree it is a good source, even though some things can and should be questioned. The data is ok even though some definitions can be questioned and also the data collection sometimes. But that it will always be like that, so fine. It is more the overall score/ratings that comes from the data I question. First of all, does the data represent everything on the pitch? No, of course not. It does not include failed or successful offside traps/lines, communication, leadership, screening, etc. It does not include who you played against. And then in the end people have made the decisions of how much passing a ball 100 times should be worth compared to a goal.Sure but its a good resource if you understand how it works, its especially good for attacking players.