Harry Kane MBE | Performances

I think Harry Kane has done enough in his club to be considered among best strikers in the world and having a good world cup can definitely rise his profile but I also thinks he would need to move to a better club for people to start rating him above the likes of Lewandowski, Aguero, etc.

Tottenham 4-2 Real Madrid on aggregate
 
Even though I really like Lukaku, I think he is currently the best striker in premier league.
Aguero keep getting less game also help Kane cement that position.
But I think he got many stick here because his antics and he plays for Spurs

Ps I've probably missed someone out but most will agree Kane is in top 3 to 5 in the World?

Top 5 striker? Definitely
I don't think so about top 5 forward/attacking player though, there are Ronaldo, Messi, Salah, De Bruyne, Neymar, and other who is in the diacudiscu for that
 
Best number 9 in the world currently. There is no one better right now. Had a quiet game but contributed with 2 goals. England's only world class player.
 
Best number 9 in the world currently. There is no one better right now. Had a quiet game but contributed with 2 goals. England's only world class player.

Funny how that part is twisted for different players. When someone like Rooney or Lukaku plays average game and scores, people would say "he scored goal but he was poor".

Not saying Kane is average or anything, just that particular point is used both ways for different players.
 
Funny how that part is twisted for different players. When someone like Rooney or Lukaku plays average game and scores, people would say "he scored goal but he was poor".

Not saying Kane is average or anything, just that particular point is used both ways for different players.

I agree with you. However when you examine football in simple teams, the role of a GK is to stop goals going in, the role of a striker is to score goals. He did, and job done
 
I agree with you. However when you examine football in simple teams, the role of a GK is to stop goals going in, the role of a striker is to score goals. He did, and job done

Yeah agree with that.

Just in last friendlies, Lukaku scored 2 and made 1 assist, some guy said it wasn't all that good performance apart from goals and assist. With you on this, job of strikers is to create and score and Kane did his job.
 
Yeah agree with that.

Just in last friendlies, Lukaku scored 2 and made 1 assist, some guy said it wasn't all that good performance apart from goals and assist. With you on this, job of strikers is to create and score and Kane did his job.

Many people talk s*ite these days. If you look at the goal scoring record of Kane over the past 3 seasons, who is better in world football as a number 9?
 
He had a pretty average game, looked heavy and slow in the head for most of the match. That usual quick thinking and clever movement just didn't seem to be there for him.

Saying that though his natural ability of sniffing out goals (tap ins) is a real blessing. The header especially was much harder than it looked.

He's got to perform better, but getting 2 goals under his belt will take the pressure off immensely.
 
"For me, I struggled to get them off me. I tried to run at a few corners and couldn't move. I guess, as players there's nothing we can do about that.

What's he moaning about, did he want Tunisia's player to let him play his game ? he needs to stop this b****** to the media all the time.

"You look at the penalty they got. I've not seen it back, but on the pitch it looked quite soft.

"We just have to hope the officials get it right more often than not."

He added: "It's part of the game. We knew from watching the other games, there's been a lot of penalties and a lot of soft decisions. We had to be aware of that.

"We had one against us today and probably another couple that didn't go our way. It's difficult, but as players all we can do is get on with the game.

"It's down to the officials and hopefully when they watch it back they will make it right for the next games."


And what's it about Tunisia's penalty, if anything it should have been a sending off, it was a clear elbow. how can you be this bitter, i would understand if they lost, but England won ....
 
And what's it about Tunisia's penalty, if anything it shuld have been a sending off, it was a clear elbow. how can you be this bitter, i would understand if they lost, but England won ....
We have so many PK decisions in this WC and unsurprisingly people rarely 100% share the same opinion about a call. Seen quite a bit disagreement for this one too. Commentator on German TV also said it's extremly soft and not a penalty for him.

The call is a joke tbh. Look at the position of his elbow, his arm movement and where the Tunisian's players head is. Clearly not an intentional elbow. This a pretty regular arm movement (and not an elbow check) that happens 100x during set pieces etc, the guy just had his head lowered and was looking for it.
 
Last edited:
The penalty was soft and 100% not a sending off. Walker said he got the call from Trippier to leave it because the attacker wasn't getting the ball so he put his arms up to shield the ball out and accidentally hit the face of the attacker who went down like he had been shot.

As Rio said after, Walker's body shape was all wrong for the situation and he should have been facing the ball but that is a consequence of player a RB at CB.

That said, I'm not too offended by the penalty as it was unintelligent play by Walker.
 
If you compare their records over the past 5 seasons it proves that you are being straight delusional. There is no contest between these players they shouldn't be spoken about in the same conversations.

Even an injury slowing Kane down this season still saw Lukaku only manage to get 16 goals compared to Kane's 30 in the Premier League. He took on average nearly twice as many minutes per goal.
Are you for real? Lukaku has close to matched Kane over the past 5 years and he's hardly played in a creative side, and I include United in that. Kane gets twice as much service playing for a Spurs side that is built around him.

For Kane's goalscoring record, which is excellent, his general all round play is fairly shocking; He has no pace whatsoever, he could well have been Englands slowest player last night, and he provides little in terms of chance creation for team mates.

Lukaku has everything that Kane has and more. He runs the channels far more effectively, is stronger and more creative. I would not swap Lukaku for Kane.
 
He's been very good, but he needs to perform better at the highest level.

He's only been world class in the Premier League with nothing to show for in the CL or international level.
 
No, he's playing further forward where he'll find even more goalscoring opportunity.

feck it though, it doesn't matter that he's had an elite season in a record breaking side. Needs throwing into a gulag after today's performance.

It’s not just this one performance though is it? The logic that he will score more centrally than on the wing doesn’t wash in football, two very different positions the main problem bring there is a lot less space centrally than out wide.
 
Are you for real? Lukaku has close to matched Kane over the past 5 years and he's hardly played in a creative side, and I include United in that. Kane gets twice as much service playing for a Spurs side that is built around him.

For Kane's goalscoring record, which is excellent, his general all round play is fairly shocking; He has no pace whatsoever, he could well have been Englands slowest player last night, and he provides little in terms of chance creation for team mates.

Lukaku has everything that Kane has and more. He runs the channels far more effectively, is stronger and more creative. I would not swap Lukaku for Kane.

I'm not sure what to say about this comment. Kane's all round play is excellent I'm not sure if you've ever seen a Tottenham game in your life or?

PL Goals scored in the last 4 seasons:

2014/2015 - Kane 21 vs Lukaku 10
2015/2016 - Kane 25 vs Lukaku 18
2016/2017 - Kane 29 vs Lukaku 25
2017/2018 - Kane 30 vs Lukaku 16
 
The mind boggles.
Please enlighten me then, Robin the Liverpool fan, what does Kane have that Lukaku doesn't?

Can you disagree with what I've said as regards him having greater pace and power, running the channels better and being debatably more creative?
 
He's been very good, but he needs to perform better at the highest level.

He's only been world class in the Premier League with nothing to show for in the CL or international level.

He's scored 9 goals in 10 Champions League appearances and 15 goals in 25 England appearances so far in his career. That's quite a lot of something at those levels.
 
Please enlighten me then, Robin the Liverpool fan, what does Kane have that Lukaku doesn't?

Can you disagree with what I've said as regards him having greater pace and power, running the channels better and being debatably more creative?

TBH I'll keep Kane at Spurs then as he is good enough for us and you can keep the better player in Lukaku. I'll just have to deal with the vastly better goal scoring records somehow.
 
Are you for real? Lukaku has close to matched Kane over the past 5 years and he's hardly played in a creative side, and I include United in that. Kane gets twice as much service playing for a Spurs side that is built around him.

For Kane's goalscoring record, which is excellent, his general all round play is fairly shocking; He has no pace whatsoever, he could well have been Englands slowest player last night, and he provides little in terms of chance creation for team mates.

Lukaku has everything that Kane has and more. He runs the channels far more effectively, is stronger and more creative. I would not swap Lukaku for Kane.

Except Kane has better movement, is the better finisher, is better holding the ball, and the better player when the stakes are high, the latter being something Lukaku really needs to sort out. Add to that consistency too.

You are right about being stronger, creative and running the channels, but if he can't sort the rest out it doesn't matter
 
What's he moaning about, did he want Tunisia's player to let him play his game ? he needs to stop this b****** to the media all the time.




And what's it about Tunisia's penalty, if anything it should have been a sending off, it was a clear elbow. how can you be this bitter, i would understand if they lost, but England won ....

Did you see the game, on 2 occasions Kane was basically being climbed over and brought to the ground and the ref did nothing in absolutely blatant positions that would have resulted in penalties. If I didn’t know better I would think the red was handed a stuffed brown envelope before the game.
 
The penalty was soft and 100% not a sending off. Walker said he got the call from Trippier to leave it because the attacker wasn't getting the ball so he put his arms up to shield the ball out and accidentally hit the face of the attacker who went down like he had been shot.

As Rio said after, Walker's body shape was all wrong for the situation and he should have been facing the ball but that is a consequence of player a RB at CB.

That said, I'm not too offended by the penalty as it was unintelligent play by Walker.

Nail on head and why Walker shouldn’t be at CB he was facing his own goal and the ball coming over his shoulder, he could see neither the player or the ball. Soft penalty maybe but it was idiotic from Walker.
 
What's he moaning about, did he want Tunisia's player to let him play his game ? he needs to stop this b****** to the media all the time.




And what's it about Tunisia's penalty, if anything it should have been a sending off, it was a clear elbow. how can you be this bitter, i would understand if they lost, but England won ....

Kane is complaining about inconsistency - if the raised arm by Walker is probably a penalty, then presumably a full on rugby tackle in the box is definitely a penalty?
 
Please enlighten me then, Robin the Liverpool fan, what does Kane have that Lukaku doesn't?

Can you disagree with what I've said as regards him having greater pace and power, running the channels better and being debatably more creative?

So why is his goal scoring record no where close to Kane’s if he has more ability? Let me guess it’s Man United style of play that’s happening him....
 
Please enlighten me then, Robin the Liverpool fan, what does Kane have that Lukaku doesn't?

Can you disagree with what I've said as regards him having greater pace and power, running the channels better and being debatably more creative?
He scores more goals, is lethal in the box and can actually create score goals on his own, something Lukaku sorely lacks. Did you watch our game yesterday? Lukaku had 7 touches in the first half and went into hiding went things got rough - he needs (a lot of) supply to score goals, his first touch and hold-up play are still terrible, he has a poor record against big teams in the PL and he struggles against defenses that sit deep as well. Kane doesn't have pace but neither did Inzaghi or Van Persie and others - he's simply a world class striker, while I'd class Lukaku as a good striker who scores goals if everything goes well, with the potential to be even better if he improves certain aspects of his game.

Besides all that, Lukaku doesn't come close to Kane's goalscoring record in the PL in the last few years.
 
Except Kane has better movement, is the better finisher, and the better player when the stakes are high, the latter being something Lukaku really needs to sort out. Add to that consistency too.

You are right about bring stronger, creative and running the channels, but if he can't sort the rest out it doesn't matter
That I can agree with, and thought of it after my post. Kane is the more effective in big games, he seems to relish them. I don't think he's categorically the better finisher. Lukaku's second goal yesterday showed a lot of his strengths at once.
 
That I can agree with, and thought of it after my post. Kane is the more effective in big games, he seems to relish them. I don't think he's categorically the better finisher. Lukaku's second goal yesterday showed a lot of his strengths at once.

Lukaku misses quite a few chances, he certainly isn't as good a finisher as Kane.
 
That I can agree with, and thought of it after my post. Kane is the more effective in big games, he seems to relish them. I don't think he's categorically the better finisher. Lukaku's second goal yesterday showed a lot of his strengths at once.

Let me ask what you think, who’s header was the more difficult yesterday... Kane’s or Lukaku’s?
 
That I can agree with, and thought of it after my post. Kane is the more effective in big games, he seems to relish them. I don't think he's categorically the better finisher. Lukaku's second goal yesterday showed a lot of his strengths at once.
Really? Maybe its down to Pochs tactics but he doesn't seem to be the same player away from home against the top sides.
I don't know how much this has changed but Lukaku and Kane had the same scoring rate v the big 6 at the start of last season.
Kane just seems to be consistent, I don't think he has any big game elevation to his play tbh.
 
So why is his goal scoring record no where close to Kane’s if he has more ability? Let me guess it’s Man United style of play that’s happening him....
Re-read what I've written, his all round game is better. He has more qualities than being a poacher.

If you choose to judge on goals scored alone, that is up to you, although Kane had twice as many shots in the PL last season.
 
Really? Maybe its down to Pochs tactics but he doesn't seem to be the same player away from home against the top sides.
I don't know how much this has changed but Lukaku and Kane had the same scoring rate v the big 6 at the start of last season.
Kane just seems to be consistent, I don't think he has any big game elevation to his play tbh.
Hasn't he scored 7 goals in the last 7 North London derbies?