I just cant warm to the mouth breathing cheat, they way he deliberately takes players out in a very dangerous was makes me really not want him here.
Harry Kane | "I will be staying at Tottenham this summer and will be 100% focused on helping the team achieve success."
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
Feck off, Sparky. You'd love him.
Id support him, because he'd be in our shirt, but Id feel dirty doing it, he is a thoroughly unlikable little shit, cant stand him.
Falls under the 'Shits in Football' ruling. Our shit = we love him, your shit = we hate the cnut.
Yeah, I made my peace with rooney for ten years plus, Im sure I could find enough antacids to cope with mr bean for two or three.
Roy Keane knows something.
We stand absolutely no chance of getting him unless a) he throws a fit and specifically demands to come here b) we give them silly money. Neither of these things are going to happen. Absolutely zero chance of it.
Anyone noticed how Kane was trying to lean with his back over Maguire to win the duel and was pushed away? This is exactly how you deal with this.
Well, took Harry big part of his career to learn he's going nowhere in Spurs. If he'll stay, then I'll still respect him as a striker... as long as he'll keep melting down the whole AFTV.
Roy simply likes him and I'd be very surprised if Ole doesn't rate him in PL.
How would you feel if it were us or, for example, city to fund their rebuild?
Who gives a shit about giving Spurs money? It's not like they're going to do anything with it.
We gave them loads of money for Sheringham, Carrick and Berbatov as well. The 3 lads have 10 league titles, 2 European cups, 2 FA cups and a handful of league cups, club world cups and charity shields to show for it.
What do Spurs have to show for the money?
We gave them loads of money for Sheringham, Carrick and Berbatov as well. The 3 lads have 10 league titles, 2 European cups, 2 FA cups and a handful of league cups, club world cups and charity shields to show for it.
What do Spurs have to show for the money?
Well, thats why they cost less.
We've been rubbish without Pogba, we've been rubbish with Pogba at times this season. It's not the point, you said they "impact each other game", what I find interesting but don't see any evidence supporting that claim so would be nice if you explained why you think so. Goal against Milan is a good example of Pogba skills and Fernandes awareness, which is all about individual quality but nothing more.
IMO the 4-2-2-2 works because Pogba plays higher up, that's it. There is no special cooperation with Bruno.
Did we all miss the irony given your name is 'Sparky', one of the most tenacious, aggressive and sometimes downright player's we've had?
The kind of trickery Martial can display is miles away from Kane's, I wouldn't compare those two in almost any sense.
Martial and Kane couldn't be more different really, they're both footballers though.
Well you clearly have privy to his psychological make up given that you stated that he's mentally ill equipped to play for Utd.
Many players have left the 'nortoriously soft team' that is Spurs and done very well at other clubs: Bale, Walker to name but 2. I believe we got a certain Michael Carrick from the underachievers; didn't stop him being a lynchpin of our midfield for many a season.
Look, I can get why you and others don't like him but to pull baseless psych evaluations out of thin air is a bit silly.
The kind of trickery Martial can display is definitely miles away at the moment...it's often every other season!
If the Glazers really wanted to kick on, they'd put £200m down this summer and sign Sancho and Kane.
A front 3 of Rashford/Kane/Sancho with Martial/Greenwood/Amad rotating in, could be a great attacking side.
A spurs rebuild will just end up like what happened with the Bale money.
You can buy 5/6 players if you want but it's highly unlikely they'll give Kanes impact on the team.
Bale and Carrick both left for bigger things within 2 years from their breakout seasons. Kane has been competing for the Golden Boot for 7 years now. If he doesn't go this summer it's perfectly valid to question his ambition and mentality.
Yeah, we're better to unlock teams when both are playing, as they have that something different. When teams have only one of these two to worry about, it's easier. West Ham away is another show how poor the first half was without Bruno, but then when Bruno came on, Pogba and Bruno combined well and scored and created goals.
Players and formations go hand in hand. You don't need Yorke Cole combinations to see why we're a better team with both Pogba & Bruno playing, than when one isn't.
Sadly, Glazers would seem it cheaper to just qualify for the CL than to win leagues or CL's. Would cost them more in bonuses.
i’d like to think 1 of their teams seeing success recently in the NFL super bowl might spur them onto wanting their global giant to do the same, here’s hoping.
Well I'm not so sure about that because you effectively sacrifice one attacking player to accommodate Pogba (who plays very offensive in that formation). Don't get me wrong, Pogba was very good last night, but for me it's him OR Bruno.
IMO we would be a better team if rotated those two more often.
Hopefully.
Surely it's more sensible to play these two creative players, especially against the low block teams?
He'd have to do a massive diarrhoea shit in Levy's hand and even then, Levy would claim he'd won as he had a hand full of free sweetcorn.
Savage and 100% correct
Love this.
That's the question. Personally I'd rather give one spot to Greenwood. We'll definitely sign a striker this summer (assuming Cavani and Martial will be gone) so it's not so obvious to me that we should play both Bruno and Pogba. I also think we've overplayed Fernandes.
It's not likely IF we do manage to pull off a miracle and sign a genuine world class striker in Haaland that he and his agent will want to stay at United for more than a couple of years,
So in this case, I grade his age irrelevant.
Ibra No. 2 in my opinion, he'll flutter about Europe gaining as many signing on fees as possible.
That's why his agent INSISTS on him having a low release clause in his contract.
The beautiful, pooey game
Armchair Psychologists do have access to that information, you don't seem to be in the know unfortunately
Sadly I haven’t
We have no idea if he'll want a release clause again. It was completely understandable when he made his last move, but with the numbers that we're talking about now I doubt any club will agree a release clause that isn't extremely high.
I believe that was the 'deal breaker' for us last time? (I may be wrong) If it was of such importance then, it likely will be again moving forward.
But yeah, we can't predict the future.
I guess there goes his chances of breaking shearers record
Ill post this everywhere, what about Greenwoods play as a CF suggests he can play there? As right forward yes, he looks like he has it, I really hoped we could move him to CF based on peoples assertions on the caf, but every time he plays there he looks dreadful, doesnt get into the box, and looks lost positionally, coming off that right side he looks like a genius.