cyberman
Full Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 37,331
City are in trouble IMO.
"Guess I have to stay at this shithole club for another season"
WooooooooLevy is walking around his office strutting like Ric Flair.
Looks like we didn't have to wait till next week. Staying as expected - I reckon he will sign a new contract now (with a release clause)
Mistake by Spurs. If offer was 150 mil eutos then they should have accept it.
I am sure Haaland would not come here anyway… He rejected us once already…I would be happy if I was wrong.Not if City decide to go for Haaland next summer because he’s half the price of Kane it isn’t, I’d rather City get Kane so we get a free run of all the English clubs at Haaland.
But Ronaldo want go there ! So who cares…Now they'll go for Ronaldo
I doubt 99% of their fans think it is a mistakeMistake by Spurs. If offer was 150 mil euros then they should have accept it.
Gotta admire City when they get their business done as quickly as this..
Kane is fantastic player but rejecting a 150m offer for him is a mistake imo. With that amount of money you get to buy 2-3 quality players and improve the squad and actually go in some new direction with new manager.
There's no replacement for a 25-30 goal a season striker though. They are very few and far between. Yeah they could invest it elsewhere but when you lose all those goals, you're fecked.Kane is fantastic player but rejecting a 150m offer for him is a mistake imo. With that amount of money you get to buy 2-3 quality players and improve the squad and actually go in some new direction with new manager.
City are in trouble IMO.
Yep, he has to helped you conquer Europe once and for all, in the Europa Conference League.He is worth much more to Spurs than that.
Yep, he has to helped you conquer Europe once and for all, in the Europa Conference League.
That's what you get when you have an animatron for a football agent.
Kane is fantastic player but rejecting a 150m offer for him is a mistake imo. With that amount of money you get to buy 2-3 quality players and improve the squad and actually go in some new direction with new manager.
Then we will probably get Kane.If City gets Haaland because of this shit...
Yeah we only signed a 45M player we didn't really need.
I cannot imagine the abuse Utd would be getting if we spent 100m on a player we really didn't need, dicked about all summer unsure of whether or not we should fix the glaring hole in our squad then the target eventually rejected us for taking too long and not paying what was needed.
This was unfortunate
Yeah we only signed a 45M player we didn't really need.
Yeah we only signed a 45M player we didn't really need.
What about Chelsea reinvesting the Hazard money with young exciting players like Kai? Just seems like a really bad idea hanging on to an unhappy, aging player while his value plummets.Completely disagree. People thought the same when Spurs sold Bale and the recruitment that season was terrible and they were clearly far worse despite going with the exact same approach you suggested (even more in fact, I think they brought in 5 players). Kane's irreplaceable, simple as that.
Wonder if this means City try again next summer or go for Haaland.
Then we will probably get Kane.
AnytimeAnd get tons of abuse for it!
Thanks for proving my point