I find it hard to tell what point you're trying to make.
That much is evident, you found it hard to tell the point in your previous reply, too. Happens when you're blinkered in your posting agenda, and jump to post before you read.
Perhaps I could try again. I stated how, in my opinion, Kane's decisions have left him bereft of all of the achievements typically used by footballers to find meaning in their profession. Trophies, individual honours, legacy at a club, money, etc. He was passively culpable at first through inaction, and now actively with this worst-possible move to a club that doesn't really need him to win what they win. His legacy is that he has no legacy - an elite striker with nothing to show for his skills because he let himself be toyed around to stoke the ego of a businessman. Every choice Harry Kane has made in his career so far has maximized returns for Daniel Levy and minimized the legacy of Kane himself. Which is why I, along with many other posters, am calling him a fool for it.
I would have liked him at United if we had the luxury to buy him, of course, but I'm glad we chose to strengthed the team instead of spunking it all out on a 30-year old striker who is yet to show his mettle in big games. I was of this opinion long before the window opened with this saga:
If we had limited budget due to takeover not going through yet and Kane still cost the Levy ransom, I think we should get a cheaper and less prolific alternative at CF and focused on midfield backups/competition instead. The balance in the squad would be more important for us than the team collapsing everytime Casemiro is sent off or Eriksen gets injured. We simply cannot go into next season with Fred/McT as starting option for ANY key game, even Kane upfront won't save us in those games.
Your response to this, however, was to cherry-pick the fact that I'm calling the transfer to Bayern a poor personal choice, and retort with a petty sour grapes accusation. Given that I mentioned Chelsea and City as alternative destinations, you think I'm crying sour grapes because Kane dismissed the PL itself, not just United, which is quite amusing and telling. Which brings me back to your blinkered view of interpretating posts as an attack on the legitimacy of the Bundesliga itself and resorting to personal condescension as a defense. Maybe you should ponder over the irony of the fact that in this case, what you're so vehemently defending is the transfer of a prolific striker to your rivals who have been winning the league for the last decade without fail.
But I'm quite certain you'll find it hard to tell what point I'm trying to make here, as well.
