hargeaves did not mark juninho or anybody else out of the game.
Hargreaves vs. Carrick, Feadingseagulls vs. Noodle, Chief (Bayern Fan!) vs. Logic
- Thread starter anything about now
- Start date
- Status
hargeaves did not mark juninho or anybody else out of the game.
I'm talking shit eh? when I haven't said any were that that Tevez played badly or that he would have done better than Rooney upront. Just that his clinical. Get a clueBullshit. The formation never changed. Just the personnel did. We played 4-2-3-1 through out.
We played to our strengths. We just weren't clinical enough. It happens. Get used to it.
our midfield problems are due to the too many cooks syndrome overall.
You are cluless
Did you even watch the game???
Watch with your eyes open next time mr
Tell them
Bullshit. The formation never changed. Just the personnel did. We played 4-2-3-1 through out.
We played to our strengths. We just weren't clinical enough. It happens. Get used to it.
sometimes i wonder if you watch the same game - explain to me how we played to our strenghts tonight? fast, attacking football? mmm, ok?
Exactly. Hargreaves job was good. He was the reason why Juninho was invisible.
Benzema goal was amazing and exactly as you said.
we kept possession most of the night, especially most of the 2nd half
That's true - he ain't all that apart from his free kicks.
Lyon is a selling club - they usually have to offload their hottest prospects after a season or two (Malouda, Diarra, Essien - Benzema in the summer, guaranteed). And still Juninho is there after, what, seven seasons?
He's a good player and a loyal servant to his club, but if he was so fantastic he'd be out of the French league years ago.
utter shite
Bullshit. The formation never changed. Just the personnel did. We played 4-2-3-1 through out.
We played to our strengths. We just weren't clinical enough. It happens. Get used to it.
I genuinely believe Carrick offers more on all fronts. He's creatively much superior, defensive contribution is very underated, and he is more of a threat in the attacking third.
I dont have to. If your own eyes didn't regsiter it then I can't help you. We should have one 3-0 tonight. awya from home agaisnt quality oppnents. I wish we had been more clinical with oue chances and Benzema hadn't had his momment of magic. Then people like you would have nothing to lie and moan about
nobody said he was the best player in the world, but he is a very good player.
the majority of posts i read from you confirm that you are a tit.
Get a clue
If Hargreaves "marked Juninho out of the game" then he must have spent the entire game on the half way line with the Brazilian.
Hargreaves did okay against what he was up against. Aside from a few untracked runs from Kallstrom that ended with him wasting the ball, Hargreaves done everything that was required of him defensively tonight.
But he didn't mark anyone out of the game.
Hargreaves did okay against what he was up against. Aside from a few untracked runs from Kallstrom that ended with him wasting the ball, Hargreaves done everything that was required of him defensively tonight.
But he didn't mark anyone out of the game.
I posted this, I'd estimate, a fair few Owen Hargreaves threads ago...
You are truly patehtic.
yep, thats right - you spend the past 2.5 hrs talking shit about a game and player i have doubts you even watched in full..........
hargreaves has been an injury-prone player his entire career, him 'getting injured after being rushed back' due to his earlier injury isn't a surprise, you're clutching at straws now.
Hehe
You forgot to mention all the one's we've merged.
Do you remember Ralph Milne Plech?
You can mark some one out of the game without being with him all day. By making sure he can;t play or be effective when he has the ball.
well said. I give up, im sure Hargreaves will prove himself in a big game and evryone will change their minds. Kind off like what happened with Carrick, a few weeks ago people wanted SAF to play a scholes-Anderson midfield because Carrick is shit...look at them now. Hargreaves will prove what a good player he is
Like I said, he was too deep to make things happen. Hargreaves didnt have to worry about him for the most part as the only times he looked like he wanted to make something happen was from freekicks.
Juninho did what Scholes often does these days (though ironically not tonight) and sat deep just making simple passes for the most part, not making forward runs. The job was put to Kallstrom to make offensive runs which Juninho would have done in previous seasons.
Split between the two I think Hargreaves did reasonably well. But he didn't mark a player out of the game, he covered his area of the pitch (which Juninho barely seemed interested in threateneing)
Only vaguely
Not going to read through this whole thread but Hargreaves wasn't terrible today BUT he didn't do what he was bought to do and that is control the middle of the park for European matches. He should get much of the blame for the goal by Benzema but not all. Benzema did get that shot off with about 5 red shirts watching.
I don't know why I hardly remember him, I think I remember everyone else from that time, even Mal Donaghy, and he only existed in Fergie's head
Thats the most miserable post I've read on the caf, just how bad was he?
On par with Hargreaves.
Watch with your eyes open next time mr
These are some of Torn Rubber Chief's posts on this page alone.
I don't how highly you think of yourself Torn Rubber but there are better ways of putting across your point. Get your head out of your own arse and stop treating every opposing viewpoint like that. If you can't debate without putting down others then there's no place for you here.
carrick playing well does not mean we dont need harry
anyone still remember why we lost to acmilan last year when carrick played in both games?
that is why we lacked one to play the defensive role just like gattuso
yes offensively carrick may be better than harry but no one knows if harry does not play, maybe we would concede more goals last night as you can see lyon's counterattack is very good
in european games, it should be the choice over anderson and carrick if we play a 442
anyone still remember why we lost to acmilan last year when carrick played in both games?
that is why we lacked one to play the defensive role just like gattuso
yes offensively carrick may be better than harry but no one knows if harry does not play, maybe we would concede more goals last night as you can see lyon's counterattack is very good
in european games, it should be the choice over anderson and carrick if we play a 442
Good point, I wonder if the Chief has ever thought of that
missing four first teamers in Rio, vidic, Neville and Saha didn't help either.
we'd have had an easier time against a milan side missing Nesta, Seedorf, Pirlo and ambrosini.
I still think he's rubbish
You lot can keep pretending he's great if you want.
He's not though, far from it, and sooner or later you're all going to have to admit it
You lot can keep pretending he's great if you want.
He's not though, far from it, and sooner or later you're all going to have to admit it
Stop being a bloody hypocrite. I pointed out something blatanlty clear to all and the punk started calling me a tit for it? Of course that is pathetic. On top of that, you seriously can't tell me that a person who thinks 3-5 clear chances in over 90 minutes of football against tough, organised opposition in Europe, away from home, is appaling, is a person who has a clue.......
Mehro: Take cover
- Status