And I've only just read the first post. With this new knowledge I can now quite certainly say that Owen Hargreaves is not the next Roy Keane.
(Get in, 71 pages)
Hargreaves vs. Carrick, Feadingseagulls vs. Noodle, Chief (Bayern Fan!) vs. Logic
- Thread starter anything about now
- Start date
- Status
And I've only just read the first post. With this new knowledge I can now quite certainly say that Owen Hargreaves is not the next Roy Keane.
(Get in, 71 pages)
Jesus Christ lads. This thread is the most boring thing I've ever endured.
Oh come on don't be like that, Plech's posts were funny at least.
I couldnt be bothered looking for them, It would take me approximately 3 months to read everything in this thread. Here's my contribution :
Carrick is better, cause he doesnt have stupid hair.
Calm down FFS chief! I'm sort of on your side.I would be if I was writing a thesis or an official speech. Or some other official document, where proper English is used. The type with no grammatic, phonetic or structural error. But I was using spoken English. The type people speak. The type that allows people to say "Me shirt was caught in the door" or use slang & still have people understand what they mean.
But on here, to my chagrin, I keep having to spell out every bloody thing I mean when I post. As I'm back in freaking grammar school
We just want you to clarify which sense of '2nd' you meant in different statemants.
I reckon you want to say that you started out by supporting Bayern due to family reasons - then you fell in love with Utd. - now you support them equally.
Is that right?
Here's my contribution :
Carrick is better, cause he doesnt have stupid hair.
Oh god, now you've done it.
I think the gist is that some people reckon Hargreaves' hair is exactly what is needed in Europe, whilst Carrick's hair, although nice lacks some experience scruff in the neck or something like that.
It's certainly a classic of its type.
A dubious honor
If Carrick had hair like Hargreaves, we'd have won in Milan. I'm supremely confident of that.
If Carrick had hair like Hargreaves, we'd have won in Milan. I'm supremely confident of that.
Not neccessarily because Kaka's hair still has better gloss and composition than both.
I'm not mad at you. I'm just and at having to always spell out every single thing I mean when I post. Simply because people are always ready to misconstrue it, on here.
That Manchester United is the second club side from a small group of two that I support. From a group that basically has no hierarchy.
Pretty much
Hargreaves hair would have shielded the defences hair better.
If Carrick had hair like Hargreaves, we'd have won in Milan. I'm supremely confident of that.
This is the second best argument in the thread. After the porpoise one. And by second I am implying a hierarchy. Although in this case the temporal meaning is equally valid. But that's not the one I intended. Just to be clear.
Is that OK?
So in conclusion, that Michael Carrick bloke had better go get himself a perm, the useless bastard.
another insult Jesus..GodYep. Equating some one to
and "imagining" how the might have felt in 99, in the clearly stupid fashion you portrayed, is only showing how ""must have been a bit weird that's all."Right
After I reacted angrily to your freaking piss take.
In my world? So suddenly I live on planet Earth and you dont? Or wasn't that an obvious case of saying I live in some imagined plane of inane existence, which an uncalled for insult, again? Just like in your first post?
Maybe because you are naturally a rude individual. Skilled in the art of insulting people for now reason.
Just like I'm not alone in supporting two sides equally. So you have no right to take the piss.
On a messageboard for United fans you can now expect to have the piss taken royally I'm afraid. Chief Torn Rubber Two Teams.
Here's my contribution :
Carrick is better, cause he doesnt have stupid hair.
I'm waiting for it to be available on Amazon.
Will it be on telly? Hope it's on BBC. Sky's only my second chioce channel.
Ah right, I gets him now.
Chief, a few questions -
1. Do you have a third, fourth or fifth team or did you just stop at two? Were you not tempted, for example, to support Bordeaux after Zidane led them to UEFA Cup glory?
2. You said you supported United in 1999. Who did you support in 2001?
3. You have accused people criticising Hargreaves's performances this season for not being objective enough. And yet now you admit to being a Bayern fan. Don't you think your love of all things Bayern might have clouded your judgement on this one?
How on earth can you support United and Bayern that's just bizarre. Pick one or the other!
Much though I admire the chief's persistence here, and although I generally agree with his comments, I think you have a good point here - one which any supporter would struggle tio answer if being honest. Doesn't mean the guy concerned has really been overly subjective either though.
His explanation was pretty clear tbh.
FSG, you're a feckin wierdo mate. Seriously strange.
I fecking hate Zidane. You have now topped my hate list
Neither
Talk of being a village idiot.
so my Love of MANCHESTER UNITED DOESN'T FACTOR INTO THE EQUATION AT ALL?THE SAME feckING REASON WHY PEOPLE SUPPORT A CLUB SIDE AND THEIR NATIONAL SIDE! OR DOES THAT feckING CONFUSE YOU TOO?!
Do you hate me first or second?
Er... they don't play each other
Most people think I'm odd - that's fine - I just think they could do with being more like my wife - she reckons most other people should be more like me.
You are on a list that comes from a small group of 1.Do you hate me first or second?
so the feck what?Er... they don't play each other
On a messageboard for United fans you can now expect to have the piss taken royally I'm afraid. Chief Torn Rubber Two Teams.
that's rich, ralphie. who taught you the Indian ways of naming?
Has someone hacked the chef's account? He's much less coherent than usual - has someone spiked his drnk?
- has someone spiked his drnk?Fantastic.
But you hated Zidane first didn't you? So doesn't that mean I'm your second hated person?
Dear God.
As it goes I sort of understand where you're coming from. I support both Manchester United and my local side Glentoran. When we played in pre season I went along in my Glentoran shirt wearing a Utd scarf. The difference for me is that Glentoran are unfortunately nothing more than a part time team. If ever they were playing competitively with Manchester United I would have to make a choice between them. That choice would be United. What people find difficult to understand is being able to support two teams equally when there have been so many occassions where the two have met.
You're just jealous because we get paid a decent wage to work about 30 days a year doing a job we love, carry out research into areas that genuinely interest us, drink beer in meetings, and get more fresh student minge offered on a plate than our tongues know what to do with.
Makes me glad I'm doing what I'm doing
Makes me glad I'm doing what I'm doing
Frosty it's really not good for you to be considering turning all the fresh student minge gay mate
Frosty it's really not good for you to be considering turning all the fresh student minge gay mate
That is why I am hated....
I promised myself I would stay out of this thread too
That is why I am hated....
I promised myself I would stay out of this thread too
This thread is like a black hole, the whole of the Caf is going to collapse into it
I know. I didn't even want to say that I prefer Carrick to Hargreaves and think we didn't need him (at least not at that price).
Michael Owen Harrick Cargreaves
Close thread.
Close thread.
This thread is an embarressment.
- Status