Guns N' Roses - Chinese Democracy

Oasis? Oasis would have done fine without Liam Gallagher who did feck all apart from scream down the mic and get high. He's a talentless shite.

Can't be arsed getting in a big Oasis argument, but thats a drastic generalisation. Liam Gallagher is a brilliant frontman, and if you think all he does is scream into the mic i'd advise you to listen to Slide Away, Champagne Supernova etc etc.
 
Thats 1 song. The great thing about Oasis is that different songs suit Noel or Liams voice. Do you think Cigarettes and Alcohol, Some Might Say, Slide Away, etc etc would have been as good with Noel on the vocals?
 
nearly anybody could fill in for Liam, to be honest.

Bollocks.

Critics are right to cite Liam's voice as shite these days, the drug and alcohol abuse has taken its toll; but up until probably '99 his voice was one of (if not THE) the best of his generation - setting Oasis apart from other bands. Primarily, Oasis are nothing without Noel - but Liam in their early years was almost as important to the band as his elder brother.
 
And another thing, why does every fecking music thread on this forum turn into an Oasis debate...?
 
Bollocks.

Critics are right to cite Liam's voice as shite these days, the drug and alcohol abuse has taken its toll; but up until probably '99 his voice was one of (if not THE) the best of his generation - setting Oasis apart from other bands. Primarily, Oasis are nothing without Noel - but Liam in their early years was almost as important to the band as his elder brother.

:lol:

Are you really saying that Liam Gallagher has a good singing voice?
 
I saw Oasis before they were even known, but Liam has never had a good singing voice ever. Yes, it fits their style, but it's nothing that Noel could not have done himself. What started this argument is that you said that Liam and Noel were as necessary to Oasis as Rose and Slash were to GnR. It's a silly thing to say.
 
I saw Oasis before they were even known, but Liam has never had a good singing voice ever. Yes, it fits their style, but it's nothing that Noel could not have done himself. What started this argument is that you said that Liam and Noel were as necessary to Oasis as Rose and Slash were to GnR. It's a silly thing to say.

Ok, I'll try put it this way.

Ian Brown + John Squire = The Stone Roses

When Ian Brown went off on his own, was it the same, just with someone else on the guitar? No...the same way G'N'R aren't the same without Slash.
 
And another thing, why does every fecking music thread on this forum turn into an Oasis debate...?

Because a lot of the people on here have a very limited musical vocabulary. It`s one of the reasons that a thread on tedious has beens like Metallica can run to like four pages plus. Their fans haven`t moved on. Same with Oasis.
 
Bollocks.

Critics are right to cite Liam's voice as shite these days, the drug and alcohol abuse has taken its toll; but up until probably '99 his voice was one of (if not THE) the best of his generation - setting Oasis apart from other bands. Primarily, Oasis are nothing without Noel - but Liam in their early years was almost as important to the band as his elder brother.

maybe...I don't really wanna know.

anyone who can plug their nose and talk could sing that. a few lines up your nose and you've got the swagger as well.
 
Oasis? Oasis would have done fine without Liam Gallagher who did feck all apart from scream down the mic and get high. He's a talentless shite.

This is one of the most ignorant posts i've read in a while. Maybe Liam isn't the best singer technically but he has done a shit load for Oasis in many respects, do you honestly think Oasis would be as big if Liam wasn't there generating publicty & making the papers every other week (especially in the 90's). In 2006, Q Magazine voted Liam the 11th best singer of all time. Now i don't personally agree with this but you'd be an idiot to think that he was a talentless shite.

There are plenty of bands how don't have a on paper good singer but they have something more. Ozzy Osbourne can't really sing but never stopped Black Sabbath from being a great band, Bobby Gilespie can't sing or dance but he pretty much IS Primal Scream. Neil Young's voice famously gets on peoples tits.

One of the most frustrating things for me is people who are ignorant about music, everyone is entitled to their opinion but some people sound like they don't really know what they are talking about half the time.
 
This is one of the most ignorant posts i've read in a while. Maybe Liam isn't the best singer technically but he has done a shit load for Oasis in many respects, do you honestly think Oasis would be as big if Liam wasn't there generating publicty & making the papers every other week (especially in the 90's). In 2006, Q Magazine voted Liam the 11th best singer of all time. Now i don't personally agree with this but you'd be an idiot to think that he was a talentless shite.

Yes.

Don't read Q magazine.
 
One of the most frustrating things for me is people who are ignorant about music, everyone is entitled to their opinion but some people sound like they don't really know what they are talking about half the time.

I'm not ignorant about music, I've studied "music" quite extensively.

He's a talentless shite because he brought nothing to any of their compositions. Even his singing, if Noel had done it himself, they would not have been any less successful. In fact, Noel has a better voice.

No Liam:

 
I just read that Dr. Pepper is giving out free coupons since this album came out this year. I guess earlier in the year they said if it was released in 08, they'd give out free Dr. Pepper to Americans. Fantastic news.
 
I'm not ignorant about music, I've studied "music" quite extensively.

He's a talentless shite because he brought nothing to any of their compositions. Even his singing, if Noel had done it himself, they would not have been any less successful. In fact, Noel has a better voice.

No Liam:



With Liam :

 
My point is that Noel could have sung that. He wrote the bloody thing. It would have been slightly different, yes, but would not have distracted from what it is.

The crazy thing here is that that first album was brilliant and refreshing, and all Noel Gallagher's work basically.
 
Q Magazine voted Liam the 11th best singer of all time.
lol...who works at Q? Bowie, Al Green,Mercury,James brown,axel rose, etc.didnt even make the list.
Q magazine needs to get its head out of Oasis's Arse.
 
lol...who works at Q? Bowie, Al Green,Mercury,James brown,axel rose, etc.didnt even make the list.
Q magazine needs to get its head out of Oasis's Arse.

I'm not a fan of Q really, i was just using it as an example of how weaste was being a bit hasty saying Liam was a talentless shite. When a well respected publication has put him quite high up in their list of singers.
 
Nah Liam was a great front man, without him it wouldnt be the same. But vocal ability..im not so sure.
Axel on the other hand was a great front man with a great vocal to back up the attitude.
Tbh i dont think Slash is half as important to GNR as people are saying.. this album was always gonna be hard to live up to, after waiting 15 years lol.