Oh Manchester...
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2014
- Messages
- 393
Probably Ali's win over a 25 year old George Foreman, and the manner in which he went about it.
Bjørndalen
This was the one that sprung to my mind.Tiger Woods winning the 2008 US Open on one leg.
He completed the full tournament with a double stress fracture to his leg and his ACL was operated on only days after he won, an injury that would put him out for the remainder of the season.
He could barely walk come the 18 hole play off. Probably an obscure shout in and amongst some of the great things in this thread but I remember watching that weekend in awe of him.
Armstrong was mentioned, and the rife doping probably taints it to a lot of people.Hardly a single mention of any Tour de France winner. In my mind there's very little that comes close to the physical endurance these guys have to suffer through over a month long period. And I hate cyclists.
A great shame when that's the only mention the sport gets.Armstrong was mentioned, and the rife doping probably taints it to a lot of people.
They've only themselves to blame really.A great shame when that's the only mention the sport gets.
Tarring them all with one brush. I'm sure there's been many winner over the years who hasn't doped, particularly back in the early days when bikes were heavier, and we didn't have the science in sport that we do today.They've only themselves to blame really.
I'm not saying every rider has done it (although it wouldn't surprise me) but when it's as rife as it has been you can't blame people for not holding the sport in any great regard. Anyway, we're going way off topic.Tarring them all with one brush. I'm sure there's been many winner over the years who hasn't doped, particularly back in the early days when bikes were heavier, and we didn't have the science in sport that we do today.
Armstrong was mentioned, and the rife doping probably taints it to a lot of people.
Hardly a single mention of any Tour de France winner. In my mind there's very little that comes close to the physical endurance these guys have to suffer through over a month long period. And I hate cyclists.
Find it interesting that most of these things are tangible except for Bolt's. Which is all about perception. You feel the occasion because he timer tells you, not because you can see him run 0.05 seconds faster than Blake or Gay or whomever.
I don't know, think you can pretty clearly see he's ran a lot faster than everyone else in pictures like this and they're all pretty fast so you know he's a bit special.
I don't deny that it wasn't special. Just an observation.
Blake has run 9.69 in a -0.1 headwind.. as opposed to the Bolt world record 9.58 with a +0.9. Still Bolt is faster, but yea.
Wasn't that in a dead rubber?Brian Lara 400 not out against England.
Yep. On a ground famous for batting records and a pitch deliberately made as flat as possible so Lara could go for the record. Lara did far more impressive things than that innings.Wasn't that in a dead rubber?
Laxmans innings against Aus in 2003 was pretty incredible.
Similar to this, South Africa winning the 95 rugby world cup given everything. That was incredible.Wilkinson drop goal in WC 2003.. majestic sporting moment
This is true to a large extent, the game today, and since the mid 90's, has been dominated by goaltenders (something I'm not a huge fan of) and it's certainly not as easy to hit 100+. Looking at last season, 84 points winning the Art Ross is incredible, lowest total to ever win it in a full season I believe. I think by the end of their careers Crosby and Ovechkin will be considered in the top 10, top 15 at least. But even with that considered you have to look in awe of how incredibly dominant and talented both Gretzky and Lemiuex were. Gretzky hit 200+ on 4 occasions (only player ever to) and the closest anybody has come to those two was Yzerman with 155. Even in an era where 100+ point seasons were common and many average players had their totals inflated, Gretzky was still on a level of his own, at his peak he would definitely be the league's best in pretty much any era. Even at the end of his career in the late 90's on a poor Rangers team he was still one of the leagues leaders. You also have to account for their playoff performances as well, two Conn Smythes each. They're the two greatest IMO.Alot of record ones are insanely debatable by certain changes in their respective sports. For instance, Gretzkys shit, goalies were absolutely gash back then, neither he or Mario would do 150+ in todays generation consistently. Forget 2ppg averages. Also add in the salary cap, Crosby is very much up there with them, but statistically he probably won't get near them or others.
Ditto Baseball, some insane discrepancy from when records were set to the standards of what current players can get even attain despite superior fitness and endless technology advancements.
Do you really think those guys didn't use doping? They competed in a different era and that's why they were never found out. Merckx was accused of doping and had to leave the Giro in '69 because of it - he even admitted he used Pemoline and other amphetamines during his career, it was just so much easier to deceive the tests back then.I mentioned him, with white text. Hope no one considers him a 'great'.
Eddy Merckx got a mention. Bernard Hinault and Greg LeMond definitely deserve to be in this thread, who else?