Chorley1974
Lady Ole
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2006
- Messages
- 13,071
Both of them can't stand Mourinho
pretty much like the caf then
Both of them can't stand Mourinho
Fergie used to make the same comments. It's called protecting your players. Behind closed doors do you really think he's mollycoddling them? He's been pretty brutal with individuals this season about getting fit and walking through walls (which the Caf criticised him for) so do you really see that changing?
Any team which gets to a European final will have to deal with over 60 games a season - not really sure why anyone's looking for sympathy for being good. Especially with the massive squads in the modern game - a far cry from the 14 or so players the likes of Liverpool survived with in their hey-day.Different time though. Not comparable IMO
IndeedAny team which gets to a European final will have to deal with over 60 games a season - not really sure why anyone's looking for sympathy for being good. Especially with the massive squads in the modern game - a far cry from the 14 or so players the likes of Liverpool survived with in their hey-day.
Any team which gets to a European final will have to deal with over 60 games a season - not really sure why anyone's looking for sympathy for being good. Especially with the massive squads in the modern game - a far cry from the 14 or so players the likes of Liverpool survived with in their hey-day.
Of course he's done better. Not by much mind you and both had disappointing seasons but we spent 20 years telling everyone how the league is the one and true indicator of quality. They have 9 more points than us so obviously they are better than us if we use our own logic. That doesn't mean they had a better season though as trophies are more exciting than league position, they just aren't necessarily an indicator of quality. And obviously, if you play front foot pro active football that is generally considered entertaining, you always get more slack and that is why Wenger for so long and now Pep get less criticism. Nothing upsets neutrals more than impotence and sheer tediousness.They always mention the cost of the players but it's pretty evident in our squad, and in fact the Premier League as a whole, we don't get value for money.
There really isn't much we can do about that if we want to buy players and they ask for another £10m.
I just don't understand why Pep does not get the same treatment on how much he spent. He has spent more and they have done no better than us.
Why isn't it comparable? If anything the more physical style of play back then and the worse condition of the pitches would make a player more tired/more unlikely to be able to play twice a week. Plus they wouldn't be able to get the same level of treatment as the players today can.Different time though. Not comparable IMO
And he turned down the chance to sign Cantona and Schmeichel.
Why isn't it comparable? If anything the more physical style of play back then and the worse condition of the pitches would make a player more tired/more unlikely to be able to play twice a week. Plus they wouldn't be able to get the same level of treatment as the players today can.
That means nothing if you're playing Thursday Sunday every week. Only once has a team managed to finish top 4 whist starting in Europa League.
Is there evidence to support this? I don't doubt the smoking and drinking, that just increases the likelihood that players back then were tougher to be able to do that and still play every game though. Although if they did indeed run much less like you say then that could explain it.Because they didn't run as much or cover as much ground. What I said about that Liverpool side going out on the piss and smoking like chimneys isn't made up.
Any team which gets to a European final will have to deal with over 60 games a season - not really sure why anyone's looking for sympathy for being good. Especially with the massive squads in the modern game - a far cry from the 14 or so players the likes of Liverpool survived with in their hey-day.
Yes but there wouldn't be two former United players saying this in the studio after a Liverpool game.Really think we need to take the criticism on the chin. There is not much to argue with. Just hope it changes next season
And you all know if somehow Liverpool were in same situation with Jose as boss with same cash spent. Everyone here would have a field day if they finished 6th and had such a poor season
Is there evidence to support this? I don't doubt the smoking and drinking, that just increases the likelihood that players back then were tougher to be able to do that and still play every game though. Although if they did indeed run much less like you say then that could explain it.
Lol go and watch any game from the 60s to the 80s and tell me if they run or play at the same tempo. No chance. It's all fits and spurts.Is there evidence to support this? I don't doubt the smoking and drinking, that just increases the likelihood that players back then were tougher to be able to do that and still play every game though. Although if they did indeed run much less like you say then that could explain it.
Really think we need to take the criticism on the chin. There is not much to argue with. Just hope it changes next season
And you all know if somehow Liverpool were in same situation with Jose as boss with same cash spent. Everyone here would have a field day if they finished 6th and had such a poor season
And if you play in the champions league you play Wednesday and Saturday.
You need to check your stats too. Chelsea and Spurs finished top four starting in Europa. So did City when they made it for the first time. Liverpool when they won the treble in the old UEFA cup.
Cheers!Modern players run further in a game and with more sprints per game. They play in the edge now. In Souness's day they didn't
@sizzling sausages
Yes there is evidence
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...uld-have-run-rings-round-your-lot-136038.html
That is from 2002. I would very much imagine that now the game is even more intense.
Sadly not sure the figures were able to be tracked back then but given how much more physically fit players are now, running over 10kms a game, there's absolutely no chance that was bettered in the dark ages of the backpass, ten pints of Guinness and 40 marlboro - unless you disagree?
I wasn't really doubting TR's statement, just wanted to see how much of a difference there was.Lol go and watch any game from the 60s to the 80s and tell me if they run or play at the same tempo. No chance. It's all fits and spurts.
City and Liverpool have had far better seasons in the league. Scored loads more goals. Liverpool have done this wit a fraction of the resources Utd haveIt's been the same at Liverpool, Arsenal and City though.
United just get the most stick despite Jose being in the job the shortest amount of time.
Laughable really.
The only meaningful stat in that article is this:Modern players run further in a game and with more sprints per game. They play in the edge now. In Souness's day they didn't
@sizzling sausages
Yes there is evidence
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...uld-have-run-rings-round-your-lot-136038.html
That is from 2002. I would very much imagine that now the game is even more intense.
That's not much different from the current average which is about 10-11km.When British researchers looked at footballers from the old First Division in 1976, they found that the distance covered in a game was an average 8-11 kilometres, 25 per cent of which was walking and 11 per cent sprinting.
You may have missed it but there's also Champions League games played on Tuesday's.And if you play in the champions league you play Wednesday and Saturday.
You need to check your stats too. Chelsea and Spurs finished top four starting in Europa. So did City when they made it for the first time. Liverpool when they won the treble in the old UEFA cup.
The fact we are accepting the excuse of tiredness is ridiculous.
City and Liverpool have had far better seasons in the league. Scored loads more goals. Liverpool have done this wit a fraction of the resources Utd have
Arsene wenger has received nothing but stick all season really. You must have missed that
You keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel betterPoints wise City and Liverpool haven't had a far better season. We were ahead of City only a few weeks ago and one point behind Liverpool.
Spurs and Chelsea have had great seasons. Everyone else has been par.
You keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better
I'm more of a realist
It's been the same at Liverpool, Arsenal and City though.
United just get the most stick despite Jose being in the job the shortest amount of time.
Laughable really.